And -- to discuss SUV's -- my little Jeep Liberty actually gets better gas mileage than my old car did. As does my son's Chevy S10. We won't talk about my husband's huge Dodge Ram


Moderator: Orlion
Well, crap!duchess of malfi wrote:In part it is price gauging. In part, it is also that they have to raise their price so they can afford the next shipment of gas, which will cost them a heckuva lot more...
What's started happening in the last few days is that companies (like mine) have started charging a fuel surcharge. Who do you think that is going to get passed on to? Everything we buy is shipped somewhere by either truck, plane, ship, or train. All those things run on petroleum products. All facets of life will be impacted.ur-bane wrote:Although the US economy took a blow, a recession is not likely happen.
Sure, we may have shortages of goods and less exports until the ports reopen, but that's hardly a recession. The US economy has been growing at a steady 3.5-4% over the past year. It's weathered storms in the past, and should do so again.
Trillions? The total population of the affected states is not much over 10 million, and large areas of those states were not damaged at all (particularly Alabama, the most populous of the three). At a rough guess I'd say five million people lived in the areas hit by the hurricane. A trillion dollars would provide $200,000 per person for rebuilding, or about $500,000 per household. That's got to be more than the replacement cost of every building, power and sewer line, highway, street, canal, and levee, even assuming everything had to be built from scratch. And it won't be: most buildings and infrastructure are heavily damaged, but a lot can be salvaged and rebuilt.Cail wrote:Actually, construction is going to take a huge hit. All resources will be diverted to the South. We tried to place orders today for plywood (which usually comes in in a week), we're being told we'll get it sometime in October. Oh, and it's twice as expensive as it was last week.
I'm taking the long view on this. If NO is rebuilt (and Biloxi for that matter), we're looking at 4 years minimum, and costs that are going to run into the trillions. If this isn't a recipie for recession, I don't know what is.
Norway does produce a lot of oil, but somehow that does not translate into lower oil prices. Actually the grade of the north sea oil is quite good I have heard, so turning it into gas should not be a problem.High Lord Tolkien wrote:I'm surprised and curious, Ryzel.
Surprised because I thought Norway produced a lot of oil.
Curious because I wonder what causes the high price if your country does.
Is it all tax?
Or is it the grade of the oil that makes it cost a lot to turn into gas.
Just wondering.
Ok, let me jump in here with a little bit of knowlegde that floated my way recently.High Lord Tolkien wrote:I just paid $3.099 (I've always hated that damn .009 cent!).
So let me see if I understand this right.
The gas that was sitting in the stations tanks (lets keep it extremely simple) for the past week was purchased and delivered 2 weeks ago at a certain price.
That same gas that has already been paid for at a lower price has now increased 50% at the retail level because of *FUTURE* gas purchases by the station?
How is that not unethical and not gouging?
(and I don't need the definition of gouging, thanks)