Pantheon 2.0 - Rules and Comments Thread

Post by **Benito Alvarez** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:13 am

Good job. Stays with the previous roleplay. Funny how quickly this game can escalate eh? Heh.

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:17 am

Heh. Brings in some of the things I've been working through with Xar today as well. (We were trying to decide what happened after the end of Pantheon 1. Loremaster may be amused to know that we decided the god Thyddian was only an illusion.)

Post by **Benito Alvarez** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:20 am

Whelp, the invasion literature is up. It'll co-incide with my turn nicely

Post by **Loredoctor** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:20 am

Murrin wrote:Heh. Brings in some of the things I've been working through with Xar today as well. (We were trying to decide what happened after the end of Pantheon 1. Loremaster may be amused to know that we decided the god Thyddian was only an illusion.)

ROFLMAO!

Post by **Norn** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:22 am

What about the rest of them?

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:29 am

We were able to come to few conclusions. We disagreed on a couple of points, and our main concern was to work out what happened to Maeror, so I could refine the way I play him now. Might be amusing to try and work it out, but I think leaving it all a bit shady and unclear works just as well.

Post by **Benito Alvarez** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 1:30 am

I was just talking about shades!

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:50 am

Murrin wrote:Some people would end it like that, but, I really am serious about not intending Maeror to be so heartless with mortal souls. It won't fit with my previous actions at all, though. I need to work it out.

I have found a way. Continuity is saved, hurrah!
Y'know, I'm starting to think I'd really enjoy writing the General's story as a full length thing. If I was any good at writing full length things. I'll have to wait and see how it ends, though.

Post by **Queeaqueg** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:43 am

Queea, would you take a break from repeating this? I exposed that you were lying before, and how you intended to break the treaty from the start and attack Chisi. Yet you conveniently forget to answer those points.

But you basically screwed the game over for me when you shattered the world last game. I felt there was no reason to keep playing Thyddian as the land was ruined for me. And the entire pantheon didn't team up against you.

There wasn't much chance for anyone to react. You are just lying, Nor, when I mentioned about breaking the treaty, you completely agreed with it. You still deny the fact that you wanted to destroy Norn and take Landir.

Now I am going to lose the North-East of Landir.

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:12 am

Have already lost, Quee. Do try to keep up.

Post by **Queeaqueg** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:29 am

No, they are still mine but there is no-body in them.

Post by **Xar** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 10:43 am

Murrin wrote:
Murrin wrote:Some people would end it like that, but, I really am serious about not intending Maeror to be so heartless with mortal souls. It won't fit with my previous actions at all, though. I need to work it out.
I have found a way. Continuity is saved, hurrah!
Y'know, I'm starting to think I'd really enjoy writing the General's story as a full length thing. If I was any good at writing full length things. I'll have to wait and see how it ends, though.

I've been toying with a couple of ideas about offshoots of the Pantheon game... perhaps if the game goes on long enough, we might come up with a book of stories set in Eiran - the Revelations of the various gods and the tales of the Prophets, to say the least

I'm saving all the stuff you guys send me, in any case...

Post by **Loredoctor** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:30 am

Queeaqueg wrote:There wasn't much chance for anyone to react. You are just lying, Nor, when I mentioned about breaking the treaty, you completely agreed with it.

Queea, I'm kind of tired of repeating myself. For the last time, I did not agree to you betraying Chisi. As soon as you pmed me your plan the first thing I did was forward your words to Chisi. Further, I sent an army to defend her realm and I made an artifact to help defend her lands. Prattle on all you want about your view of events, the fact remains I didn't support them. Chisi will attest to my words, anyway.

Queeaqueg wrote:You still deny the fact that you wanted to destroy Norn and take Landir.

Yes. Because it was Norn I spoke to in order to begin my betrayal of you. I only ever asked you to invade Bhakti. Second, Xar himself backed me up when I stated you were the one who had the intentions of attacking Norn and making the main invasion. Amusing how I never sent any troops to Landiir.

Don't bother repeating yourself again.

Post by **Bhakti** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 11:39 am

Xar, do tell us about your talk in front of the Nobel prize winner! Topic? How did it go?

Post by **Queeaqueg** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:13 pm

Ahh, of course... PMs you sent to Xar is proof

You have sent me countless PMs and replies on how you want Landir to yourself, having Norn destroyed... especially Bhakti. You even sent a PM saying how much you want to set up Undine... not to mention your agreement to break a treaty with La'Roo. And you did send quite a few troops to Landir becuase I kicked them all out.

Post by **Loredoctor** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:28 pm

Edit.

Post by **Xar** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:34 pm

I think I speak for everyone when I say we've probably gone over this enough times as it is... I'd appreciate it if the whole "who wanted to betray whom" could stop. Whatever's happened is happened, and no amount of complaining or arguing is going to change events which have already been posted, so such a long discussion is meaningless anyway.

Sorry, guys, but if I see another post referring to the Queeaqueg-Nor Yekith betrayal/double crossing/whatever which took place one or two turns ago, I'm going to delete it.

Post by **Loredoctor** » Fri Dec 15, 2006 12:45 pm

Xar wrote:I think I speak for everyone when I say we've probably gone over this enough times as it is... I'd appreciate it if the whole "who wanted to betray whom" could stop. Whatever's happened is happened, and no amount of complaining or arguing is going to change events which have already been posted, so such a long discussion is meaningless anyway.

Sorry, guys, but if I see another post referring to the Queeaqueg-Nor Yekith betrayal/double crossing/whatever which took place one or two turns ago, I'm going to delete it.

My apologies Xar. Apologies to the rest of the pantheon players for having to read of this dispute. I will cease immediately.

Post by **Bhakti** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:44 pm

Xar wrote:Sorry, guys, but if I see another post referring to the Queeaqueg-Nor Yekith betrayal/double crossing/whatever which took place one or two turns ago, I'm going to delete it.

Do you mean just them? Can I still egg things on?

*ahem*

But seriously...

Simjen wrote:The purpose of this book will be to set and inforce law. Be it natural law or the rulings between men, nations, or even deities. What is written will be reflected in what is. And it will be bound to the one who writes their name on the front page.

Hedra Iren wrote:The goddess of knowledge I may be, but I am also the goddess of Law. I have taken this burden upon myself, and I intend to uphold it, through my own heritage, my power, and the Book of Law forged by the Smith. I shall not abide any attempt at breaking or cheating the laws of the world...

It sounds like Simjen somehow made a book that Hedra can write in, and, if she writes something about what the laws of a Forest will be, my Forests are bound to it. I would be very surprised if that is the case. I just don't know how to interpret these quotes. Help?

Post by **I'm Murrin** » Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:46 pm

Indeed. The impression given is that she has been offered absolute authority over the gods themselves.

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

Pantheon 2.0 - Rules and Comments Thread