Page 5 of 6

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:33 am
by Avatar
Wyldewode wrote:I still find it hard to use real names instead of the usernames.
I only use user names. :D As far as I'm concerned, your name is what you introduce yourself by. Even though I know the real names of many of the watchers, I never ever use them, except when the real name is an abbreviation of the username.

--A

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:00 pm
by AjK
matrixman wrote:That seems harsh. Wouldn't a reprimand have been more appropriate? Or don't your employers believe in the idea of second chances?
They have adopted a zero tolerance policy in several areas. One strike and you are out. Of course this can only be easily implemented in areas where things are black & white. Short of explicity showing genitalia and/or sex acts I suppose there is a gray area somewhere and thus room for argument. For the record the email that I was referencing was described as pretty clearly pr0n. While it did not involve two people lets just say it wasn't a typical portrait shot from JC Pennys.

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:12 pm
by wayfriend
AjK wrote:
matrixman wrote:That seems harsh. Wouldn't a reprimand have been more appropriate? Or don't your employers believe in the idea of second chances?
They have adopted a zero tolerance policy in several areas.
That comes from a fear of lawsuits. The penalty may be harsh, but they consider it a case of whose butt to protect.

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:19 pm
by matrixman
I understand now. Lawyers shall inherit the Earth...
Avatar wrote: I only use user names. :D As far as I'm concerned, your name is what you introduce yourself by. Even though I know the real names of many of the watchers, I never ever use them, except when the real name is an abbreviation of the username.

--A
That's my standard policy, too. I should never have given out my real name here; unfortunately, that can't be taken back.

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:05 pm
by Avatar
:LOLS: Mine only got out because of the anthology...I couldn't publish something under a pseudonym. Anyway, I don't think it's serious...hell...you give out your name over the phone daily probably. *shrug* Is not such a big deal. But I do have unspecified paranoid issues over it. :D

--A

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:14 pm
by matrixman
Avatar wrote::LOLS: Mine only got out because of the anthology...I couldn't publish something under a pseudonym.
Damned dirty...anthology!
Anyway, I don't think it's serious...hell...you give out your name over the phone daily probably.
Generally, no. Only if the person on the other line asks for confirmation of my name, and I make a point of asking why. Unless I'm in an irritated mood, in which case I'll curtly acknowledge my name, and I'll give the person a few seconds to justify my time on the phone before I hang up. Since I'm not a big phone user anyway, I tend to not be in a good mood when I get calls out of the blue.

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:23 pm
by Wyldewode
You two are charmingly (and perhaps correctly) paranoid. :D

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:27 pm
by matrixman
Well, maybe I'm paranoid about phone calls the way companies are paranoid about lawsuits over silly pr0n e-mails, so there. :P

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:43 am
by Avatar
Hahaha, personally, I hate it when my phone rings. :D

--A

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:13 pm
by dANdeLION
matrixman wrote:That's my standard policy, too. I should never have given out my real name here; unfortunately, that can't be taken back.
I'm still trying to figure out how people here learned my real name.....

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 5:29 pm
by Cail
I told you to keep that to yourself, Fred.

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:59 pm
by dANdeLION
I thought my real name was Frank.....

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 12:15 am
by Cail
No, you speak frankly Fred.

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 3:44 am
by dANdeLION
I thought I spoke English, and had a girlfriend named Joe.


Okay, so I stalk a girl that I call Joe, but in my mind, stalking's practically dating. And besides, my counselor thinks Joe likes me too, so like I said, we're practically dating.

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:53 am
by jacob Raver, sinTempter
wayfriend wrote:Are you a Watchaholic? Here are the warning signs.

1. Do you post alone? yes

2. Do you make excuses to post? no, KW comes 1st ;)

3. Do you need to visit Kevin's Watch frequently in order to function? Yes

4. Are you unable to stop posting in Mallorys? never have...is that where everyone is most of the time...been wondering?

5. Did you ever fight with someone on Kevin's Watch? not quite

6. Do you post on Kevin's Watch secretly (as with another handle)? no

7. Do you become angry when people mention how many WGD you have? no, raising funds

8. Has it affected your work? not yet

9. Do you worry more about how your avatar looks than yourself? Absolutely.

10. Do you experience trembling when you haven't posted? not yet
Cameraman Jenn wrote:In that case!!! GO AWAY ALL YOU STINKY NOOBS!!!! KEVIN'S WATCH IS MINE I TELL YOU!!!! ALL MINE!!!!
Shush, butt-face!

Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:42 pm
by Wyldewode
jacob Raver, sinTempter wrote:
Cameraman Jenn wrote:In that case!!! GO AWAY ALL YOU STINKY NOOBS!!!! KEVIN'S WATCH IS MINE I TELL YOU!!!! ALL MINE!!!!
Shush, butt-face!
Go easy on Jenn. . . she isn't here to defend herself. ;)

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:21 am
by matrixman
Why is it that whenever Cameraman Jenn's name pops up in conversation, the subject of butts isn't far behind?

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 12:43 am
by Auleliel
matrixman wrote:Why is it that whenever Cameraman Jenn's name pops up in conversation, the subject of butts isn't far behind?
Was that meant to be punny?

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:23 am
by matrixman
See? We can't help ourselves.

:biggrin:

Posted: Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:32 pm
by jacob Raver, sinTempter
Butt where is she?