Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 8:31 pm
If you X 'it' does 'it' then become 'It' and is the world suddenly a much darker, solipsistic place?
Official Discussion Forum for the works of Stephen R. Donaldson
https://kevinswatch.com/phpBB3/
deer of the dawn wrote:is not the female chromosome labeled X???!!
REVELATION! Because I believe in womanhood, motherhood, and sisterhood..I can always be an XX-disciple (and it's easier for me to spell, too!)I, foolishly through a momentary wavering of faith, wrote:That will just leave me confused as to whether I'm an X ex-disciple or and ex-X disciple.
Bravo to the Bison! Wisdom is displayed, for even roads less traveled can come to crossroads, which are often "X"s.Savor Dam wrote: I cannot say whether this is the different view of X which ali says Pagans probably have...only that not all paths on the road less traveled are dead-ends.
deer of the dawn wrote:Well, I am glad everyone is so freaking happy about X being all New-Age situational and all. But to my thinking X, while real, is the antithesis to I.X is the great negation, the end, the close, the "no more" of existenceIn [i]A Wind In the Door[/i] The Prophetess Madeleine L'Engle wrote: This was the end of Meg. There was to be no more anything. Ever. Exit Meg. Ex-Meg. X-Meg.
That could depend upon how well you could stand Meg, I guess. The world could seem a more exotic place. Got to watch those false prophetesses!ussusimiel wrote:If you X 'it' does 'it' then become 'It' and is the world suddenly a much darker, solipsistic place?
Y-naught is the Y-coordinate that is usually found on the X-axis, showing it's enlightened state of being. Y-naught knows you shouldn't stray from the trajectory of X, because it knows "why not"! Just wanted to send that glowing ray of illumination to this dark corner of the internet.Icarus Unfallen wrote:and apparently a factor that can only be referenced as Y (or perhaps, Y-naught
Not racist, but it IS X-ist.sgt.null wrote:That is racist.
Does this not position you as anti-Y-ist? Or could we say a Y-nottist?Cord Hurn wrote:Not racist, but it IS X-ist.sgt.null wrote:That is racist.
deer of the dawn wrote:Does this not position you as anti-Y-ist? Or could we say a Y-nottist?Cord Hurn wrote:Not racist, but it IS X-ist.sgt.null wrote:That is racist.
Cord Hurn wrote:deer of the dawn wrote:Does this not position you as anti-Y-ist? Or could we say a Y-nottist?Cord Hurn wrote: Not racist, but it IS X-ist.
Hey, y-naught?
And what is your authority for such a statement? Is this not the elevation of pop-psych to canon without notification? A premise x-nihilo?aTOMiC wrote:It is if you believe it is.
I find your assumption disturbing and lacking proper consideration. It is an established fact that belief is congruent with lifeforms possessed of the five established multi-capable intellects. There is no distinction between life-drama and the elevated state of light-living so long as one is at peace with humankind's place in our three-dimensional world-gap. The clearly, obvious layers through which believers ascend through the spiritual cloud mass of reality is apparent to anyone that bother's to pay attention to the under-field of perception.deer of the dawn wrote:And what is your authority for such a statement? Is this not the elevation of pop-psych to canon without notification? A premise x-nihilo?aTOMiC wrote:It is if you believe it is.