Opinions on the Dark Tower ending..

The Dark Tower and other works of Stephen King.

Moderator: lucimay

User avatar
Luke The Unbeliever
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee

Opinions on the Dark Tower ending..

Post by Luke The Unbeliever »

WARNING: If you haven't read through to the complete end of DT-7 you may find spoilers here...


Okay, so I know that King's ending to the series is notorious for being either loved or hated. I've been reading the DT series agin (for about the 5th time) and recently saw in the Gradual Interview where Donaldson said he'd rather be dead than feel the way he did after the ending...

I was talking to my wife recently about the ending (what happens after Roland enters the DT..) and she said something I thought a lot about.

The end, she didn't seem to think much of it one way or the other, but then again she hasn't read any of the books. But she did comment on King's in-character comments about people being greedy in nature and that they should appreciate the journey more than the ending.

In her mind those comments were ridiculous and horribly dismissive of people who want great closure to a long series. She's read many other King books as have I, and including comments in another thread here in the way of King never giving us a "good, clear ending" to any of his works. As if he might later be struck by his muse to continue the story so "the door" must be left cracked open a little bit" so to speak. On the other hand his comments in DT-7 may be a smoke screen to make up for what he felt wasn't truly what the series deserved...

Maybe...maybe not.

I for one, liked the ending to the series and came away with some hope for Roland. I wouldn't say I was angered or detested it in anyway...honestly I just felt horrible for Roland and hopeful that he will eventually overcome.

I really wondered, from those of you who have read to the complete end, just why it was you hated the ending....
Brian: Who cured you?
Ex-Leper: Jesus did, sir. I was hopping along, minding my own business, all of a sudden, up he comes, cures me! One minute I'm a leper with a trade, next minute my livelihood's gone. Not so much as a by-your-leave! "You're cured, mate." Bloody do-gooder.
Brian: Well, why don't you go and tell him you want to be a leper again?
Ex-Leper: Uh, I could do that sir, yeah. Yeah, I could do that I suppose. What I was thinking was I was going to ask him if he could make me a bit lame in one leg during the middle of the week. You know, something beggable, but not leprosy, which is a pain in the @$$ to be blunt and excuse my French, sir.
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

First thing, I have to wonder how the series would have turned out had King not gotten run over by a van in real life.

Secondly, I hated his insertion into the story.

Thirdly, I hated the idea of everyone living happily ever after.

Fourthly, given the choices King made in the last 3 books, I don't see any other way of them ending (as far as Roland's fate was concerned). As much as I disliked many elements in the last 3 books, I thought Roland's fate was very satisfying.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Mortice Root
Bloodguard
Posts: 980
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:05 am
Location: Wisconsin

Post by Mortice Root »

Cail wrote
First thing, I have to wonder how the series would have turned out had King not gotten run over by a van in real life.
Good point. I think this is illustrative of how SRDs writing process differs from SKs. From what I understand, SK doesn't have outlines or even sometimes endings in mind when he starts. He just starts writing, trusting his intuition to get him to a satisfying end. So when something major happens (the van accident) it can seriously alter a work in unforseen ways. I also didn't really like his self-insertion, but can understand why he did it. I think his lack of planning probably hurt DT some.... (the deux ex of the guy from Insomnia etc..). What's really more surprising to me is that SKs style works more often than not.

I agree that the happy endings for the questors seemed lame. I mean, I was crying real tears when Eddie died, and to have that reversal just seemed to cheapen it.

The actual ending though - I kinda liked it. Certainly it was different that what I had expected. I suspect that for a lot of people that hated it, part of the reason is that you end up feeling so damn bad for Roland, and there isn't a sense of closure.
"The plural of antecdotes is not evidence."
-------------
Driving down the razor's edge between the past and the future
Turn up the music and smile
Get carried away on the songs and stories of vanished times
User avatar
Cameraman Jenn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 13280
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Albuquerque NM (The Land of Enchantment)

Post by Cameraman Jenn »

I was pissed about Eddie and I agree it cheapened it for me. I didn't like King putting himself in the story, it seemed simply lame and too freaking convenient. I didn't understand if it was intended that this timeline was past in which case Roland has no chance because the one time that he could have succeeded was gone or whether or not he actually travelled back in time. I dunno. There was alot about it that left me feeling meh about King. There were also some great aspects to it that I loved. :?
Now if I could just find a way to wear live bees as jewelry all the time.....

www.fantasybedtimehour.com
User avatar
Luke The Unbeliever
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee

Post by Luke The Unbeliever »

Yeah, Eddie's death hit me hard...I still get upset during that part everytime I read it.

I guess I always looked at the "happily ever after" meeting as" meh, okay whatever...because to me, it wasn't the "real" Eddie or "real" Jake...I more or less shrugged it off...so I can agree with most people as to the crap factor on that part of the ending.
Brian: Who cured you?
Ex-Leper: Jesus did, sir. I was hopping along, minding my own business, all of a sudden, up he comes, cures me! One minute I'm a leper with a trade, next minute my livelihood's gone. Not so much as a by-your-leave! "You're cured, mate." Bloody do-gooder.
Brian: Well, why don't you go and tell him you want to be a leper again?
Ex-Leper: Uh, I could do that sir, yeah. Yeah, I could do that I suppose. What I was thinking was I was going to ask him if he could make me a bit lame in one leg during the middle of the week. You know, something beggable, but not leprosy, which is a pain in the @$$ to be blunt and excuse my French, sir.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61739
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Cail wrote:First thing, I have to wonder how the series would have turned out had King not gotten run over by a van in real life.

Secondly, I hated his insertion into the story.

Thirdly, I hated the idea of everyone living happily ever after.

Fourthly, given the choices King made in the last 3 books, I don't see any other way of them ending (as far as Roland's fate was concerned). As much as I disliked many elements in the last 3 books, I thought Roland's fate was very satisfying.
Yeah, I think Cail said it all for me. That's mostly how I felt...

I thought Eddie et al "coming back" did diminish the worth of the deaths in the first place. King wimped out there or something.

But the ending was ok. What I hated the most was that we'll never see the slightly different repeat. *sigh*

--A
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

Avatar wrote:I thought Eddie et al "coming back" did diminish the worth of the deaths in the first place. King wimped out there or something.
Heck, the way it ended, the worth of everything in the whole entire story was diminished. To zero. It was a do-over!
.
User avatar
Luke The Unbeliever
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee

Post by Luke The Unbeliever »

wayfriend wrote:
Avatar wrote:I thought Eddie et al "coming back" did diminish the worth of the deaths in the first place. King wimped out there or something.
Heck, the way it ended, the worth of everything in the whole entire story was diminished. To zero. It was a do-over!
I suppose I can see your point there...I really ended up liking Eddie and Jake SOOOOO much that I was entirely heartbroken over their deaths. I guess in the way that I really enjoyed the journey so much I keep re-reading DT...maybe I've got some crazy idea that everything is gonna end up differently the next time I read it. :)

How sick is that? LOL!
Brian: Who cured you?
Ex-Leper: Jesus did, sir. I was hopping along, minding my own business, all of a sudden, up he comes, cures me! One minute I'm a leper with a trade, next minute my livelihood's gone. Not so much as a by-your-leave! "You're cured, mate." Bloody do-gooder.
Brian: Well, why don't you go and tell him you want to be a leper again?
Ex-Leper: Uh, I could do that sir, yeah. Yeah, I could do that I suppose. What I was thinking was I was going to ask him if he could make me a bit lame in one leg during the middle of the week. You know, something beggable, but not leprosy, which is a pain in the @$$ to be blunt and excuse my French, sir.
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

I don't understand how the ending can diminish an entire story. The ending was perfect, it couldn't have gone any other way and made sense.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Luke The Unbeliever
<i>Elohim</i>
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:00 pm
Location: Kingsport, Tennessee

Post by Luke The Unbeliever »

Cail wrote:I don't understand how the ending can diminish an entire story. The ending was perfect, it couldn't have gone any other way and made sense.
Yeah, I agree with that.

I mean, there are some details about the ending that I didn't like but on the whole I loved it. It just seems that a lot of people who've read DT really got "rubbed the wrong way" by how King chose to end the story. I can't help but ask people why...I was beginning to wonder if I missed something.
Brian: Who cured you?
Ex-Leper: Jesus did, sir. I was hopping along, minding my own business, all of a sudden, up he comes, cures me! One minute I'm a leper with a trade, next minute my livelihood's gone. Not so much as a by-your-leave! "You're cured, mate." Bloody do-gooder.
Brian: Well, why don't you go and tell him you want to be a leper again?
Ex-Leper: Uh, I could do that sir, yeah. Yeah, I could do that I suppose. What I was thinking was I was going to ask him if he could make me a bit lame in one leg during the middle of the week. You know, something beggable, but not leprosy, which is a pain in the @$$ to be blunt and excuse my French, sir.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

Well, you can claim a story is a journey, not a destination.

But I didn't like the ending because it made the sacrifices and the choices of the characters meaningless. And because the Dark Tower was a MacGuffin.

I'm happy for SK giving us The Drawing of the Three, and Wizard and Glass. But he could have ditched the rest.

BTW, I think SK ran out of dirt road long before that van. As evidence, I give you the ending of Wizard and Glass.
.
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Meh, I disagree. I didn't find the sacrifices meaningless one bit, and while you could argue that the Tower itself was a MacGuffin, most stories have them, and the Tower was certainly effectively used.

What was the problem with the ending of W&G?
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

Cail wrote:What was the problem with the ending of W&G?
Dragging in the Wizard of Oz.

It didn't strike me as appalling the first time I read it, just bizarre, and mysterious: King still had my trust. But, looking back, it seems to be possible proof that King was thinking about this "book universe" thing as early as DT4, which was pre-van. (Wasn't it?) With hindsight, I now think the Oz/Flag thing was pretty bad.
.
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

I can't remember if that was pre-van or not. I dunno, that didn't really bother me.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
duchess of malfi
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 11104
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2002 9:20 pm
Location: Michigan, USA

Post by duchess of malfi »

I do not see how the ending with Roland could have been anything else? :? After all, ka is a wheel. :wink:

I was not bothered by the ending of WAG, either, and I think that one was pre-van (in fact, I think it was the last book in that series that was pre-van). However, I think including himself in the series was...a bad decision. :? It served to lessen the series rather then enrich it (at least to me). :|
Love as thou wilt.

Image
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24081
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

In the Fresh Journey thread, as I got towards the end, people started confusing me with what they liked and what they hated. I think some thought the ending with Susannah, Eddie and Jake came at the end, and when they said they hated the ending, they were only referring to that, not the ending with Roland.
Image
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Yes, I know I got confused with that. To be clear, I liked the ending with Roland, hated the ending with Eddie and the rest.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Carson Napier
Woodhelvennin
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 2:48 am
Location: God's very own England

Post by Carson Napier »

The Roland ending worked for me, he would have to do it all again, but this time, he had the Horn of Elde on his belt when he started out, so there is hope for him, and his entire quest could be radically different next time around.

The susanah, eddie and jake as his kid brother ending was bad, really bad IMO...I would've prefered not hearing anything of susan after she went through the door, it would've been more powerful when the Gunslinger was reciting their names as he approached the Tower, his fallen Ka-Tet, his family lost in his quest.

I'm still glad that I ploughed through the whole series though! Roland Deschain has to be one of the greatest characters ever concieved IMO, it was a pleasure to hear him brought to life by Frank Muller & George Guidall in the respective audiobooks I listened to.

Oh, and 'Oy' FTW! :D


CN
"The Bloodguard do not forgive"
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61739
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Carson Napier wrote:The susanah, eddie and jake as his kid brother ending was bad, really bad IMO...I would've prefered not hearing anything of susan after she went through the door, it would've been more powerful when the Gunslinger was reciting their names as he approached the Tower, his fallen Ka-Tet, his family lost in his quest.
Agreed and agreed...One of the things I always liked about King was that, unlike some others I could mention, he was never afraid to kill off his characters. But he lost his nerve on the Jake/Eddie/Susannah one.

--A
User avatar
Cord
Woodhelvennin
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:48 pm
Location: West Auckland

Post by Cord »

Avatar wrote:
Cail wrote:First thing, I have to wonder how the series would have turned out had King not gotten run over by a van in real life.

Secondly, I hated his insertion into the story.

Thirdly, I hated the idea of everyone living happily ever after.

Fourthly, given the choices King made in the last 3 books, I don't see any other way of them ending (as far as Roland's fate was concerned). As much as I disliked many elements in the last 3 books, I thought Roland's fate was very satisfying.
Yeah, I think Cail said it all for me. That's mostly how I felt...

I thought Eddie et al "coming back" did diminish the worth of the deaths in the first place. King wimped out there or something.

But the ending was ok. What I hated the most was that we'll never see the slightly different repeat. *sigh*

--A
The insertion of himself did appear to be a little bit of self therapy to me
I think the Jake / Eddie Detta incarnation was technically correct (ie many other worlds), but, sadly, had a sense of happy ever after...

I could see the eternally difficult Linden saying "but its not that simple..." !! :-) [whoops mixing characters here...!)
Shihad
Fat Freddy's Drop
Katchafire
Post Reply

Return to “Stephen King Forum”