Song of Susannah (spoilers!)
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 5:08 am
I'm now half way through Song of Susannah. I'm at the point where Eddie and Roland have just left Aaron Deepneau and Calvin Tower, and are on their way to pay a visit to Stephen King in Bridgton.
I'm uncomfortable with King's self references so far. I'm getting the distinct feeling that it will be Stephen King they find at the top of the Dark Tower, and that the end of the journey will be not that "it is all just a dream", but that "you're all just characters and this Dark Tower is just stuff I made up."
Then there's King's "explanations" in SoS - Eddie realising that what he saw in The Magnificent Seven parallels the 7 people fighting the Wolves, Sturges being the director of that movie and the name of the town in Wolves. I'm happy for King to use other stories and movies as inspiration (for example I enjoyed Eddie's Lord of the Rings references), but he doesnt need to *explain in the story* where they have come from. That just makes me feel like he's selling out the story - that the journey to the Dark Tower is just a journey from the characters and settings and plots and inspirations and King's influences back to Stephen King himself.
Please don't spoil the ending of the Dark Tower for me, I'm not discouraged enough to stop reading. But I must say that I think King has broken a major rule of storytelling by putting himself into the story and having the characters wonder whether they are fictional, and he better have a damn good reason for taking the story in this direction. So far I'm not convinced...
I'm uncomfortable with King's self references so far. I'm getting the distinct feeling that it will be Stephen King they find at the top of the Dark Tower, and that the end of the journey will be not that "it is all just a dream", but that "you're all just characters and this Dark Tower is just stuff I made up."
Then there's King's "explanations" in SoS - Eddie realising that what he saw in The Magnificent Seven parallels the 7 people fighting the Wolves, Sturges being the director of that movie and the name of the town in Wolves. I'm happy for King to use other stories and movies as inspiration (for example I enjoyed Eddie's Lord of the Rings references), but he doesnt need to *explain in the story* where they have come from. That just makes me feel like he's selling out the story - that the journey to the Dark Tower is just a journey from the characters and settings and plots and inspirations and King's influences back to Stephen King himself.
Please don't spoil the ending of the Dark Tower for me, I'm not discouraged enough to stop reading. But I must say that I think King has broken a major rule of storytelling by putting himself into the story and having the characters wonder whether they are fictional, and he better have a damn good reason for taking the story in this direction. So far I'm not convinced...