Kevin's Watch

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:06 pm**

Just thinkin'...

Would Roger have made a better 'tagonist in these Last Chrons?

Posted: **Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:12 pm**

Linden rocks! THOOLAH be damned!!!

Posted: **Sat Feb 21, 2009 2:43 pm**

I'd follow Linden to the caves under Mount Thunder....to the Lord Foul's demensque..even if I can't speel it <grin>.

Posted: **Sat Feb 21, 2009 11:46 pm**

If, by 'tagonist, you mean ANtagonist, then no, Linden is a much better choice than Roger

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:21 am**

If she's good enough for the Ranyhyn then who am I to judge

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 2:32 am**

jacob Raver, sinTempter wrote:Just thinkin'...

Would Roger have made a better 'tagonist in these Last Chrons?

Just a suggestion: spell out the entire word. Please? Pretty please?

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:52 am**

Roger isn't fit to be anything but a schmuck - but in that role he excels.

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 3:34 pm**

i don’t understand the question for this poll..
Guess I’m being a newby.

THOOLAH?
Tagonis? (antagonist?)

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 5:42 pm**

I assume you meant protagonist, in which case I say definitely. Right now I am more interested in Roger than in Linden. THOOLAH all the way!

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:16 pm**

Umm, wow.

Okay.

SRD could have written Roger in any way he wanted, pro-tagonist or an-tagonist. By using just 'tagonist, I'm saying that he would be the primary character we'd be "following" who drives the part of the story we're aware of, regardless of his disposition being more like Cov in the original tril. or Cov in the 2nd.

Boric,

Welcome...

THOOLAH: The Holy Order Of Linden Avery Haters

They are many and united, be careful...the lash of they're pen can sometimes be, daunting.

I for one am not a fan of Linden's...but I'm not quite that ardent.

Posted: **Sun Feb 22, 2009 9:36 pm**

I wasn't aware you were using an undefined neologism in your question.

SRD has done the same thing in the Chrons.

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:19 am**

Geez you're all picky!

I wasn't aware you were using an undefined neologism in your question.

Sounds like thinly disguised condescension to me (I thought that was supposed to be aimed at newbies like me....

), but I guess it's hard to read 'tones' over the internet - might be me totally misinterpreting...

I for one have chosen the 4th option, I'm happy to go with Linden as the protagonist and leave Roger to interfere as he sees fit...

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:29 am**

Geesh. Really now, how was I supposed to know what 'tagonist is supposed to mean?

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am**

The only thing that can dissappoint me with Roger is if SRD tries to make him heroic in the end like Darth Vader.

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:41 am**

Yah, maybe if you're not Psychic, you should post it and let the rest of us (read Haruchai) all know so we can be ready for your ignorance.

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:41 am**

Post what?

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 5:41 am**

That you can't read minds...so's we know ahead of time.

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:02 am**

Who's we?

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 6:54 am**

Endymion9 wrote:The only thing that can dissappoint me with Roger is if SRD tries to make him heroic in the end like Darth Vader.

At least his actions in Empire presaged the end of Jedi.

With Roger, I'm not seeing any way it could end other than bad...

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2009 1:30 pm**

(whispers) I can't tell you...

Kevin's Watch

THOOLAHgans hoeeeeeeee!

THOOLAHgans hoeeeeeeee!

Re: THOOLAHgans hoeeeeeeee!