Page 1 of 1

SRD Encyclopedia Entry

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 4:05 pm
by Dragonlily
I've just discovered THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FANTASY, with an article more than a page long on SRD: "US writer of central significance as an author of demanding and exploratory fantasy novels..."

The whole ENCYCLOPEDIA contains 33 references to SRD. I know this because Amazon told me so. I did a search using Amazon.com's new search function, which will search the entire texts of their books for the phrase you request.

There are 3983 results to a search for "Stephen R. Donaldson". I'm only on reference #45. I have two pieces to write this weekend, so I'm going to have to go at the Amazon results gradually. If anyone has more time, it will be interesting to hear what you find.

Incidentally, there is a prison reform advocate named Stephen Donaldson. Internal evidence suggests that Donaldson graduated from the prison system -- obviously a different person. :P

Posted: Sat Oct 25, 2003 5:08 pm
by danlo
8) Cool, thanks Joy! I believe there is an ancient thread on the old discussion board that dealt with the differentiation of the 2 SDs--the advocate passed about 6 years ago, or so...

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 8:33 am
by Loredoctor
I have an encyclopedia of fantasy which states that 'the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant is odd and pretentiously written.' Okay, at least he can write; I've lost count of how many fantasy books I've found that are poorly written.

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 1:12 pm
by Dragonlily
Define odd in the Fantasy genre. Non-formula? Isn't that rather the idea?

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 2:13 pm
by Damelon
Ur-Vile, as Captain Kirk once said, "There's no accounting for taste.".

SRD's work was probably too demanding for that person.

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 3:34 pm
by Furls Fire
I'm with Joy, the word "odd" is an odd word to use when critiquing fantasy fiction. Isn't it the point for it to be "out there", "odd", "surreal", "FANTASTIC"??

I resent most critics anyway, it's like they are always looking for something to be wrong with anything and everything they critique. They put down other people's work because they resent the fact that they didn't come up with it themselves. Not all are like that, I realize that last statement may have come out predjudicial, but the majority of critics I have heard or read, be it movies, books, tv, music, etc, really have nothing good to say about anything. In fact, if the critics say something is really terrible, I'm the first in line to see that movie, or read that book. Heh :)

Posted: Sun Jan 04, 2004 11:21 pm
by Loredoctor
Damelon wrote:Ur-Vile, as Captain Kirk once said, "There's no accounting for taste.".

SRD's work was probably too demanding for that person.
You speak truth, Damelon.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 12:47 am
by hierachy
I also speak the truth, several times a day.

Posted: Mon Jan 05, 2004 1:10 am
by Tulizar
Furls Fire wrote: In fact, if the critics say something is really terrible, I'm the first in line to see that movie, or read that book. Heh :)
I'm with you there Furls!! I usually love the movies most critics hate!