Page 1 of 2
Introducing . . . Miss Susie Thurston
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 12:56 pm
by hue of fuzzpaws
Mark 1

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:49 pm
by drew
uhhhh..
Hold on a minute.
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 4:44 pm
by hue of fuzzpaws
Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 6:11 pm
by Blackhawk
I think you got the description right.. I just listened to this scene recently and everything looks right (dont recall the clothing in the scene

) but she needs dark circles under her eyes not too much but enough to make her look like she wasnt sleeping well or she is going through a breakup.....she looks waifish enough and her expression fits.
Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2009 1:35 pm
by wayfriend
HA! You did it ... too amazing.
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:04 pm
by Lord Foul's Breath Mint
Nice work! I imagine her being a bit older and more worn than this, more '70s showbiz-cheesy.
RE: Women's clothing
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:26 am
by Wheelwash Whitecap Mate
Regarding the pictures posted on this site by some members:
I have a serious question for persons whom post women's pictures on this website. I would like to know why it is that all of the pictures thus far of women warriors must wear little clothing and be dressed scantily. I realize that this might be how some visualize the women who fight in these books, but I do not believe in my own personal opinion that I or many members of my sex would be caught dead fighting in something that looks as if it is lingerie. I think it would be more realistic and sensible to have the women dressed appropriately in pictures and in visions.
Ladies am I wrong? I do not go into a fight, if the occasion arises, in my lingerie underwear because I do not want all seen by the world during said fight.
Please consider this statement, I mean really, can't they be semi dressed? I agree that women who carry swords and fight are not going to be in sweat pants and long shirts, but black leather that reveals most of their body??????????
Just my thoughts on the pics posted on this discussion and a few others.
Wheelwash Whitecap Mate
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:44 am
by Thorhammerhand
I agree with the sentiment, in principle. The Warward picture for instance could, (and IMHO SHOULD), be dressed better, more, completely, decently (whatever you want to call it).
However in this case, Miss Susie Thurston, I believe that this picture is a very reasonable representation of the character in IEW.
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 10:55 am
by hue of fuzzpaws
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:05 am
by Thorhammerhand
Thanks hue.
Cheered me up no end.
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 4:07 am
by hpty603
I think the picture of the soldier was a bit of a joke, Hue was just having fun and not being serious. Maybe just seeing what he could make. And hey, I'm not complaining, keep up the good work
Posted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:55 am
by Thorhammerhand
However I had just finished a bad section of work and needed a laugh
Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2009 10:42 am
by Wheelwash Whitecap Mate
Ha Ha very funny. But it must be said that the outfit is at least something that I could see her kicking butt in. It would at least protect her...imagine that armor protects warriors.
WWM
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:02 pm
by peter
Wheelwash Whitecap Mate wrote:Ha Ha very funny. But it must be said that the outfit is at least something that I could see her kicking butt in.
Yes - I agree that the armour is way wore suitable for the purpouse, but if we're going to get into the issue of the portrayal of women as (sex?) objects in male dominated culture, then whyfore the need for them to 'kick butt' at all. Not to suggest that women are all sweetness and candy (or should be) , but few women could be happy to see the children they laboured so hard over being sent to war, let alone want to participate in it - and the very sensible predisposition for women to 'jaw jaw' before they 'war war' is not one that should be lightly cast aside in a misguided attempt to make literary female charachter's ape their more brutish male counterparts.
Introducing . . . Miss Susie Thurston
Posted: Sun Dec 13, 2009 4:45 pm
by Wheelwash Whitecap Mate
whyfore the need for them to 'kick butt' at all. ...few women could be happy to see the children they laboured so hard over being sent to war, let alone want to participate in it.
The need to "kick butt in a war" should not be sexist at all. Women, men, and their children should be willing to fight for freedom, civil liberties, and other things that they believe in. Yes, I as a mother of a couple of children, would worry about my children if they went to war, but their safety and freedom should not be more secure because of someone else's fighting then mine should be. If the need arises I am going to protect what is mine and my loved ones by talking or force if necessary. My blood and fighting and that of my families is no more or less valuable then any other families and will be used if called upon to protect and defend what I find precious and valuable to me and my family. However, I will be dressed in appropriate attire as I am trying to fight not have sex or distract them.
WWM
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:57 am
by Thorhammerhand
That is the attitude of the giants WWM, keep it up
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 8:18 pm
by Wheelwash Whitecap Mate
Thank you! I take that as a very big compliment. The Giants in the books that I have read thus far have shown that they are courageous, kind, hard working, and enduring when it comes to what they believe in and I strive to be that way at all times. I would find no better joy then to be in the company of such great persons or in this case Giants.
Anita W.
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:07 am
by Thorhammerhand
Giants in the LC especially FR
Re: Introducing . . . Miss Susie Thurston
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:08 am
by peter
Wheelwash Whitecap Mate wrote: My blood and fighting and that of my families is no more or less valuable then any other families and will be used if called upon to protect and defend what I find precious and valuable to me and my family. However, I will be dressed in appropriate attire as I am trying to fight not have sex or distract them.
WWM
Yes, that is fine (and completely sensible) - but the pictures here are not for real, they're just fun, not meant to be taken seriously and certainly not as an affront to the dignity of women any more than hulking male warriors like Conan were supposed to imply that all men were thick, brutish and violent.
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 11:02 am
by Thorhammerhand
Good point peter, but I (a man) feel that there should be a certain amount of respect for women, even in these forums.