Football World Cup South Africa 2010
Moderators: Lord Mhoram, StevieG, hierachy
- Damelon
- Lord
- Posts: 8549
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2002 10:40 pm
- Location: Illinois
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Germany was by far the better team, and would have won in spite of the crappy call on the goal by Lampard. Germany plays an entertaining style. The game between Germany and Argentina should happen later in the tournament than the quarter-finals in that they are the two most interesting teams to watch this year, IMO. I'll go out on a big limb, and suggest that the winner next week-end will take the cup. And, if not, I'm a dunce. (Not like I've not been called that before).
- StevieG
- Andelanian
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:47 pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Germany looked fantastic, but the disallowed goal was criminal. It would have made it 2-2 and completely changed the game. However, I think Germany would have still won, they played better.
Who'd have thought - an exciting German team??
Argies look damn good too. I'm with Damelon - I think they are the 2 best teams in the competition. Whether the winner of Arg v Ger wins the cup remains to be seen. You don't have to be the best team to win (just look at Italy last time...)
Who'd have thought - an exciting German team??
Argies look damn good too. I'm with Damelon - I think they are the 2 best teams in the competition. Whether the winner of Arg v Ger wins the cup remains to be seen. You don't have to be the best team to win (just look at Italy last time...)
Hugs and sh!t ~ lucimay
I think you're right ~ TheFallen
I think you're right ~ TheFallen
- Mr. Broken
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:49 pm
- Location: The arm pit of hell, Titusville Pa.
Just wanted to throw in my 2 cents, let me start by saying that Ive tried several times throughout my life to embrace Soccer, oops sorry about that "Football". Over the last 2 weeks Ive watched more games than ever before, and I feel like it has been a wasted effort. Im not becoming a fan, and Ill tell you why. The officials suck. This is supposed to be the most important sporting event in the world next to the Olympics and it seems like the officials get more calls wrong than right. It will never catch on here in the states unless they introduce technology into officiating. Until this happens its not even worth watching.
Wide Eyed Stupid
I'm a bit like Mr. Broken. Played soccer for years, love it, especially live, but this World Cup is terrible. Not just referee'ing, but the flopping is ridiculous (the US/Ghana game put me over the edge). I would think FIFA would enjoy American money pumped into the game, but if this is the best they got, forget about it.
I'd love someone to review every game in these finals, and count up the phantom calls and missed easy ones. I think the phantom calls are just as bad, encouraging the flopping.
I'd love someone to review every game in these finals, and count up the phantom calls and missed easy ones. I think the phantom calls are just as bad, encouraging the flopping.
--Andy
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
I believe in the One who says there is life after this.
Now tell me how much more open can my mind be?
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Whatever is said in Latin sounds profound.
I believe in the One who says there is life after this.
Now tell me how much more open can my mind be?
- Krazy Kat
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:44 am
- Location: Sky Blue City England
I'm sure they've tried technology and I seem to remember the refs talking to the monitor refs on headsets. It was agreed that technology doesn't work in football...oops...soccer. It interferes with the flow of the game, which is the essence of the sport (not forgetting the offside rule as well).
But maybe just by adding more linesmen like they do in tennis might work.
But maybe just by adding more linesmen like they do in tennis might work.
- Vader
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1865
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:03 pm
- Location: On the lam
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
As sad as it may seem, but I guess FIFA and football needs American money as much as FIA and Formula 1 racing. The fact that these sports never had that much acceptance in the USA couldn't keep them from becoming the pinnacle of sports world-wide. I don't think officials see the need to change anything to get American money.
Functionless art is vandalism. I am the vandal.
- High Lord Tolkien
- Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
- Posts: 7383
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
- Location: Cape Cod, Mass
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Is the world cup still going on?
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!
Yea, I don't think they need US money.
It may just be a public relations move but today FIFA president Blatter said they'll "revisit" replay for goals after the tournament is over. Of course, whether they do anything at that time is yet to be seen. I can see why they don't want replay for things like offsides; you could really destroy the game by continually stopping the action. And what about a call where they DO call offsides, but then find out it wasn't? Can't exactly go back and restart that play. At least if they do it for goals that'll be a start.
You don't see the NBA, NHL, or NFL using it for foul calls and penalties, but at least they can (usually) get touchdowns, fumbles, goals etc correct.
It may just be a public relations move but today FIFA president Blatter said they'll "revisit" replay for goals after the tournament is over. Of course, whether they do anything at that time is yet to be seen. I can see why they don't want replay for things like offsides; you could really destroy the game by continually stopping the action. And what about a call where they DO call offsides, but then find out it wasn't? Can't exactly go back and restart that play. At least if they do it for goals that'll be a start.
You don't see the NBA, NHL, or NFL using it for foul calls and penalties, but at least they can (usually) get touchdowns, fumbles, goals etc correct.
"History is a myth men have agreed upon." - Napoleon
- Mr. Broken
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:49 pm
- Location: The arm pit of hell, Titusville Pa.
In the NFL coaches are allowed challenges , I believe one per half when the officials make questionable calls. If the replay doesnt prove the coaches challenge legitamate they lose a time out, Im not sure how that translates to soccer, but I dont see any difference between taking the time to use replay, and stopping play to issue a penalty card.
Wide Eyed Stupid
- StevieG
- Andelanian
- Posts: 5876
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 10:47 pm
- Location: Australia
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 14 times
Simulation, as they call it - cheating, as everyone else calls it - is the biggest problem in the game in my opinion. Teams like Italy can ruin the competition through their unnecessary diving and exxaggerated "injuries" with the sole purpose of getting the opposition player into trouble. Italy are by no means on their own - most of the South American countries, and some of the others are almost as bad.
I would imagine that it's very difficult to pick up with the naked eye because they are so good at it. (That's why it's so refreshing to see teams like Australia, New Zealand and others who haven't learnt how to dive!). I would be in favour of an appeal or two from the coaches if they think there's a blatant miscarriage of justice.
I would definitely be in favour of goal line video refereeing.
I disagree that this World Cup has been terrible. I thought the standard of refereeing was exceptional, up until the round of 16 really. There were a few cock-ups, but in general I was impressed. It all went to shit a bit in the round of 16 - must have been the pressure... The action (apart from a few blatant exceptions) has been breathtaking in its speed, and unbelievable skill. There have been plenty of incredible goals (for those who absolutely have to see lots of goals), lots of upsets, and lots of great celebrations!
All sports have their frustrations, but on the whole I think it has been fantastic viewing and the best is yet to come. Nothing places me in such a gut-wrenching tense state than watching Australia come up against the best nations in the world in this sport. I love many sports, but football is THE one for me.
A couple of days rest and on to Netherlands v Brazil - what a cracker that could be!! Argentina v Germany - that should be the grand final! I'll be staying up late for those games...
I would imagine that it's very difficult to pick up with the naked eye because they are so good at it. (That's why it's so refreshing to see teams like Australia, New Zealand and others who haven't learnt how to dive!). I would be in favour of an appeal or two from the coaches if they think there's a blatant miscarriage of justice.
I would definitely be in favour of goal line video refereeing.
I disagree that this World Cup has been terrible. I thought the standard of refereeing was exceptional, up until the round of 16 really. There were a few cock-ups, but in general I was impressed. It all went to shit a bit in the round of 16 - must have been the pressure... The action (apart from a few blatant exceptions) has been breathtaking in its speed, and unbelievable skill. There have been plenty of incredible goals (for those who absolutely have to see lots of goals), lots of upsets, and lots of great celebrations!
All sports have their frustrations, but on the whole I think it has been fantastic viewing and the best is yet to come. Nothing places me in such a gut-wrenching tense state than watching Australia come up against the best nations in the world in this sport. I love many sports, but football is THE one for me.
A couple of days rest and on to Netherlands v Brazil - what a cracker that could be!! Argentina v Germany - that should be the grand final! I'll be staying up late for those games...
Hugs and sh!t ~ lucimay
I think you're right ~ TheFallen
I think you're right ~ TheFallen
Soo true, see England have a problem with doing this because whenever this is brought up all i hear is 'oh they are not English, they will not get the spirit of playing in this special and the spirit of 66'Well, actually the combined forces of Turkey, Ghana and Poland won the match, England lost and Germany just watched it
Does it matter, Germany have Polish, Ghana, Brazil and Turkey in their team, Germany don't complain.
I think players like Arteta (Spainish player who has been in this country 5 years and never played for Spain thus can be called into England team) could do a good job for England, etc
I found out that i am 1/4 Argentina thus I am from that country so i have a awesome football team, me and Messi are practically brothers :p
DEATH IS A PREFERABLE ALTERNATIVE TO COMMUNISM!
- Phantasm
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 1720
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 10:52 pm
- Location: Cumbernauld, Scotland
Well done to the Netherlands for beating Uruguay 3-2 in the semi final.
Goal of the tournament so far from Gio Van Bronkhurst. 35 yard screamer into the top corner - superb.
Looking forward to the Germany v Spain semi tomorrow. Looks like Torres might be dropped. He's had a poor tournament so far.
Could be a matter of who scores most, Klose for the Germans, or Villa for the Spanish
Goal of the tournament so far from Gio Van Bronkhurst. 35 yard screamer into the top corner - superb.
Looking forward to the Germany v Spain semi tomorrow. Looks like Torres might be dropped. He's had a poor tournament so far.
Could be a matter of who scores most, Klose for the Germans, or Villa for the Spanish
Quote - John Smeaton (Terrorists take note)
"This is Glasgow- we'll just set aboot ye"
"This is Glasgow- we'll just set aboot ye"