Thoughts on the Last Chronicles as a Whole
Posted: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:21 am
My thoughts on TLD, and the Last Chronicles as a whole, are kind of disjointed, so please bear with me.
I think, on the most basic level, the Last Chronicles seem to be telling a completely different story (and kind of story) than the First and Second Chronicles; and in some ways, I feel as though what SRD does in the Last Chronicles undermines the earlier books.
In both the First and Second Chronicles, the Land and the dangers that TC and later LA face are externalizations of their own psychological issues. And the question of the Land's reality obviously plays into that. But by the end of WGW, it feels as though the question of reality has both been answered, and also rendered moot.
Right from the "What Has Gone Before" of Runes, though, the question is reopened. At least for me, that starts the whole LC's off on the wrong foot. It makes the Land far less "important" than what's going on in LA's head.
In the first six books, the psychological struggles of TC and LA are inextricably bound up with the events in the Land. In the LC's, it feels as though the Land is "just" an arena for LC's struggles; merely a place for things to occur, rather than a fundamentally vital place - a character in it's own right.
Even as the importance of the "real world" fades (especially after the battle with Roger and the croyel at the midpoint of FR), the Land doesn't feel important. We never meet any "ordinary" people, as we did throughout the first six books (OK, there's the one scene at the Woodhelven that's wiped out in FR, but that's one scene out of four books). And it's completely glossed over at the end of TLD, with Linden's offhand comment that "thousands, maybe millions of people" died thanks to her actions. Nobody seemed to care overly much about that, least of all SRD, throughout AATE and TLD. Compare that to all the "regular people" we meet in both the First and Second Chronicles.
It feels, to me, like a cheapening of everything SRD did in the first six books, devaluing all the work he did in creating the Land and the larger world it inhabits. You can see that in his various comments in the GI about worldbuilding and the way he "only creates what he needs." I do suspect knowing that colors how I view the LC's.
The (to me) gratuitous use of teleportation, and the appearance of deus ex machina Insequents precisely where and when they're needed; not to mention other characters and races (the Feroce, for example) who show up just when they're needed with just the appropriate power to solve the problem at hand. Compare that to the First and Second Chronicles, when, yes, there were powerful beings around, but they generally had to struggle to use their powers; they didn't show up for once scene, save TC's or LA's bacon, and scamper off not to be seen again.
Another issue is the problem of Roger. Others have commented on this; the short shrift and lack of "dignity" (one of SRD's big concerns for all his characters) that he gets. In a series where one of the most basic themes is parenthood, and how far one will go to protect one's children, the fact that TC's relationship with Roger is explored not at all; and his regrets at not being a father to him are barely touched on, is a huge failing.
Jeremiah, of course, is a problem as well, at least for me. One thing that bothered me reading TLD is the lack of narrative balance (or "screen time", if you prefer). Jeremiah arguably has been dealt a worse fate, and has deeper psychological wounds, than either TC or LA did when we met them, and when we first truly meet the freed Jeremiah, he has literally been freed from his years of torment for about five minutes.
When we first meet TC, he's a 30 year old man, and he's had several months to begin to cope with his leprosy. And it takes him three full books to reach a place of understanding.
When we meet LA, her horrors are 15 years in the past, and she's managed to cope with them (in a psychologically damaging way, but still) successfully enough to become a doctor. And it takes her three books to even begin to really heal from her wounds, and another 3.5 books to get to a place of real peace.
But Jeremiah is expected, both by the author, and all the other characters, to deal with far worse horrors, with no adult experience at all to help himself, immediately (and in book terms, while TC got 3 books and LA got 6.5, Jeremiah gets not quite 1/3 of one book to deal with all his issues).
I've got more to say, but I haven't sorted it all out yet, so I'll start with this...
I think, on the most basic level, the Last Chronicles seem to be telling a completely different story (and kind of story) than the First and Second Chronicles; and in some ways, I feel as though what SRD does in the Last Chronicles undermines the earlier books.
In both the First and Second Chronicles, the Land and the dangers that TC and later LA face are externalizations of their own psychological issues. And the question of the Land's reality obviously plays into that. But by the end of WGW, it feels as though the question of reality has both been answered, and also rendered moot.
Right from the "What Has Gone Before" of Runes, though, the question is reopened. At least for me, that starts the whole LC's off on the wrong foot. It makes the Land far less "important" than what's going on in LA's head.
In the first six books, the psychological struggles of TC and LA are inextricably bound up with the events in the Land. In the LC's, it feels as though the Land is "just" an arena for LC's struggles; merely a place for things to occur, rather than a fundamentally vital place - a character in it's own right.
Even as the importance of the "real world" fades (especially after the battle with Roger and the croyel at the midpoint of FR), the Land doesn't feel important. We never meet any "ordinary" people, as we did throughout the first six books (OK, there's the one scene at the Woodhelven that's wiped out in FR, but that's one scene out of four books). And it's completely glossed over at the end of TLD, with Linden's offhand comment that "thousands, maybe millions of people" died thanks to her actions. Nobody seemed to care overly much about that, least of all SRD, throughout AATE and TLD. Compare that to all the "regular people" we meet in both the First and Second Chronicles.
It feels, to me, like a cheapening of everything SRD did in the first six books, devaluing all the work he did in creating the Land and the larger world it inhabits. You can see that in his various comments in the GI about worldbuilding and the way he "only creates what he needs." I do suspect knowing that colors how I view the LC's.
The (to me) gratuitous use of teleportation, and the appearance of deus ex machina Insequents precisely where and when they're needed; not to mention other characters and races (the Feroce, for example) who show up just when they're needed with just the appropriate power to solve the problem at hand. Compare that to the First and Second Chronicles, when, yes, there were powerful beings around, but they generally had to struggle to use their powers; they didn't show up for once scene, save TC's or LA's bacon, and scamper off not to be seen again.
Another issue is the problem of Roger. Others have commented on this; the short shrift and lack of "dignity" (one of SRD's big concerns for all his characters) that he gets. In a series where one of the most basic themes is parenthood, and how far one will go to protect one's children, the fact that TC's relationship with Roger is explored not at all; and his regrets at not being a father to him are barely touched on, is a huge failing.
Jeremiah, of course, is a problem as well, at least for me. One thing that bothered me reading TLD is the lack of narrative balance (or "screen time", if you prefer). Jeremiah arguably has been dealt a worse fate, and has deeper psychological wounds, than either TC or LA did when we met them, and when we first truly meet the freed Jeremiah, he has literally been freed from his years of torment for about five minutes.
When we first meet TC, he's a 30 year old man, and he's had several months to begin to cope with his leprosy. And it takes him three full books to reach a place of understanding.
When we meet LA, her horrors are 15 years in the past, and she's managed to cope with them (in a psychologically damaging way, but still) successfully enough to become a doctor. And it takes her three books to even begin to really heal from her wounds, and another 3.5 books to get to a place of real peace.
But Jeremiah is expected, both by the author, and all the other characters, to deal with far worse horrors, with no adult experience at all to help himself, immediately (and in book terms, while TC got 3 books and LA got 6.5, Jeremiah gets not quite 1/3 of one book to deal with all his issues).
I've got more to say, but I haven't sorted it all out yet, so I'll start with this...