Kevin's Watch

In honour of the recent success of the ' Let's pretend we're in the Close' thread (thanks to Cord Hurn for the *bump*), I've decided to start a new thread where we will continue to disagree vehemently with each other just in a much less civil manner!

I'll start:

I completely disagree with every word you have ever said and every breath you have ever taken. From now on whenever you speak I will put my hands ove my ears and loudly shout, 'LA, LA, LA, LA!'

Then when it is my turn to speak I shall repeat exactly what I have said umpteen times before in slightly different words. And slyly call you a doodoo head in CAPITAL LETTERS SO THAT YOU KNOW THAT I AM TOTALLY SINCERE AND PASSIONATE IN MY BELIEFS!!!!!"


[EDITS: to alter my arguments so that they are even stronger, and to remove any lies I told, so that I can now deny I ever said them.]

Can you back that up with source documentation?

Of course, the objectivity of any reference you provide will be summarily subject to scathing scorn.

(oops...starting to trend toward the alliteration thread.)

Savor Dam wrote:Can you back that up with source documentation?***

Of course, the objectivity of any reference you provide will be summarily subject to scathing scorn.

[Asterisks mine]



Could you provide LINKS PLEASE!!!! to demonstrate that your scorn is valid and also that it is really scathing rather than just a weak strawman effort of diverting us from the main discussion by simply sneering!

***This is so good that I changed the title of the thread to reflect its aptness; of course you shouldn't take that for a second to mean that I agree with you or think that you might ever have a valid point or be sincere, since, obviously, I have a monopoly on validity and sincerity and of course monopolies are simply the markets' way of indicating my superiority to you in absolutely every way.

If linx are what you want, this should address it twice over.


You say those are not the linx you are looking for? Got that covered too...

...and the old thread title was better.

That link is so obviously from a biased source that it worse than useless and is closer to some of the propaganda purveyed in Nazi Germany (or more recently, Putin's Russia)!

Even in the Tank, that was probably a new record for shortest time to validate Godwin's Law. Congratulations...sort of.

Savor Dam wrote:Even in the Tank, that was probably a new record for shortest time to validate Godwin's Law.

It is quite clear that that is pure speculation and unless you provide LINKS PLEASE!!! I am going to treat it with the scorn that it deserves.

It is also clear that you are completely (and probably deliberately) ignorant of the debunking of Godwin's Law and are using it in a deliberately distract from my criticism of one of the people on your side. Of course, all the people on your side are like you, wrong.

The previous link is clearly an attempt to trivialise a deadly serious issue by invoking lolcats (there is surely some Law about this. Could someone provide me with some LINKS PLEASE!!!!). Although calling a little cat 'Kitler' is mildly witty, it does not justify in any way this attempted derailment of the topic. Discussions here are intensely serious and intensely important, any attempt to dilute the nature of our discourse will be met with the scorn and denigration it deserves (but you are not allowed take it personally because they are only words on an Internet forum and, so, of course, meaningless!).

michaelm wrote:www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFw8_riIADI

I deeply resent (or resemble) the implication inherent in this link. I think that this kind of ad hominem (or in this case ad spudinem*) is deplorable and I think the Mods should get in here and ban the perpetrator of this kind of post post haste.





























* I could keep a straight face with this post

The best links prove there are no links!
www.technology.org/2014/05/10/link-madn ... gist-says/

Cord Hurn wrote:The best links prove there are no links!
www.technology.org/2014/05/10/link-madn ... gist-says/

I am really angry about this link. In fact, I am livid, bordering on furious. i am so upset and distraught that I am headed off to my attic for ther est of the day to paint and write poetry!

A link showing anger can be fertile ground for poetry creation:

www.poemhunter.com/poems/anger/

www.cagenweb.com/slo//pdf-files/1993-TT%26TPR.pdf

see! proof that I am correct!

ussusimiel wrote:

Cord Hurn wrote:The best links prove there are no links!
www.technology.org/2014/05/10/link-madn ... gist-says/

I am really angry about this link. In fact, I am livid, bordering on furious. i am so upset and distraught that I am headed off to my attic for ther est of the day to paint and write poetry!

No doubt this explains why I still smell boiled potato every time I visit this thread.

ussusimiel wrote:

michaelm wrote:www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFw8_riIADI

I deeply resent (or resemble) the implication inherent in this link. I think that this kind of ad hominem (or in this case ad spudinem*) is deplorable and I think the Mods should get in here and ban the perpetrator of this kind of post post haste.

"Ad spudinem"...lol.

Cord Hurn wrote:No doubt this explains why I still smell boiled potato every time I visit this thread.

It's exactly this kind unsupported metaphysical attempt to derail this thread that I am so enraged about!

LINKS PLEASE!

I understand why u. is steamed about this and feels he's been a salted...but he is only parsley right.

Savor Dam wrote:
I understand why u. is steamed about this and feels he's been a salted...but he is only parsley right.

Well, olive oil the pun to you, Savor Dam: butter remember to take your thyme, though!


www.tasteofhome.com/recipes/seasoned-red-potatoes