Ransom.Kovter reported on ihugny.com

Main forum for site announcements, suggestions, and help.

Moderators: Savor Dam, Vain

Post Reply
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Ransom.Kovter reported on ihugny.com

Post by wayfriend »

My Norton/Semantec anti-virus is reporting that ihugny.com has the Ransom.Kovter ransomware virus. The location provided is ---http:---//ihugny.com/---RGAOMKR/---. (The ---s were added by me so no one clicks that link.)

Image
User avatar
aTOMiC
Lord
Posts: 24594
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by aTOMiC »

Ihugny was blocked by my work computer beginning last Thursday
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Image

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
User avatar
Sorus
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 13870
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: the tiny calm before the storm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Sorus »

That's not good. No wonder it's been so quiet the last few days.

Oh, a change is coming, feel these doors now closing
Is there no world for tomorrow, if we wait for today?


User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Hmmm, weird.

Ok thanks, I will mail Vain.

--A
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Ok, Vain says he notified the hosts and was told it had been resolved.

WF, please check again and see if it is reporting it as safe now, thanks.

Not sure if this will resolve TOM's issue...hope so...

--A
User avatar
aTOMiC
Lord
Posts: 24594
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by aTOMiC »

No help for me as KW is not a work related essential site. :-(
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Image

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

Avatar wrote:WF, please check again and see if it is reporting it as safe now, thanks.
I'm not quite sure how... I've already clicked "proceed anyway" and I no longer get the message any more. But I will see what I can do.
User avatar
Sorus
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 13870
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 5:45 pm
Location: the tiny calm before the storm
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Sorus »

I don't use Norton, and my security software never flagged it (which is probably not a good thing) - but https://safeweb.norton.com does still have it listed as:
Norton Safe Web has analyzed ihugny.com for safety and security problems. Below is a sample of the threats that were found.
Summary

Computer Threats: 1
Identity Threats: 0
Annoyance factors: 0
Total threats on this site: 1
It's probably easier to get put on the naughty list than it is to be removed from it.

There is a link where the site owner can report an inaccurate rating or request a re-evaluation, but it looks like something ihugny would have to do.
aTOMiC wrote:No help for me as KW is not a work related essential site. :-(
Tell them you can't survey the Land without it.

Oh, a change is coming, feel these doors now closing
Is there no world for tomorrow, if we wait for today?


User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Yeah, looks like once you're listed, the only way off is for the domain owners to sign up for their "safe web" program.

Worst is, it's not even us, it's the top level domain.

Anyway, I've let Vain know.

TOM, any idea if it was an automatic block because your company uses Norton safe web? If so, getting off the list should resolve it, but actually getting off is probably going to be a problem.

If it was manual just because they finally picked up you were visiting it, then they're jerks. :D

Ask a friendly IT guy at the office? Just something like "hey, I noticed a site I checked out sometimes suddenly got blocked, what's up with that?"

--A
User avatar
aTOMiC
Lord
Posts: 24594
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by aTOMiC »

Heh. Since I work for the City of Tampa the I T department is a monolithic organization located in a downtown skyscraper miles from our outlying location and there is no one local to appeal to. :-)

I may well end up being a weekend poster unless I bring my laptop to work and use my phone as a Wi-Fi hotspot. I will figure it out but my presence will definitely be muted for the time being.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Image

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Ah well, every little bit helps. And your phone is always a fallback option.

(IP tunneller? (Uh, can you install stuff on that machine?))

--A
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Post by wayfriend »

FYI, anything blocking access isn't detecting the virus, it is subscribing to the Norton reputation feed. What needs to change for Tom, and others, is to remove the virus -and- to get Norton to stop reporting that the site is compromised. There is probably a mechanism which will induce Norton to rescan your site (like you can induce Google to index it).

Submit a website to Norton Safe Web

Of course, Norton is only one service. Tom's boss may use a different one. Maybe you can find out, Tom.
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Yeah, in order to submit a website or get it re-evaluated, looks like you have to a) be the domain owner, and b) sign up for their service.

--A
User avatar
kevinswatch
"High" Lord
Posts: 5584
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 2:46 pm
Location: In the dark, lonely cave that dwells within my eternal soul of despair. It's next to a Pizza Hut.
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by kevinswatch »

Good work! (I think) :biggrin:

-jay
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19629
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am

Post by Zarathustra »

So I guess it's fixed now? My Norton's blocked the site, too. I've been avoiding this place until Norton let me on today. I can't afford to have my devices lock up with ransomware.

Is there a plan for this in the future, somewhere we can go to let each other know there's a problem without clicking on the site and infecting our computers? There used to be a backup board, but it's not working now.
Joe Biden … putting the Dem in dementia since (at least) 2020.
User avatar
aTOMiC
Lord
Posts: 24594
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 6:48 am
Location: Tampa, Florida
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 7 times
Contact:

Post by aTOMiC »

Zarathustra wrote:
Is there a plan for this in the future, somewhere we can go to let each other know there's a problem without clicking on the site and infecting our computers? There used to be a backup board, but it's not working now.

This is but one of the many uses of our Facebook page and Twitter account.
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"
Image

"There is tic and toc in atomic" - Neil Peart
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 61711
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Avatar »

Yeah, maybe post the links TOM, so people can follow them. Still, I like having another option too...

(Didn't know the back-up board was down either, thanks.)

Anyway, yeah, Vain mailed me to say he'd submitted a re-evaluation request...surprised it was that quick actually.

Z, problem wasn't with us, was with the top level domain, the Watch just got blocked by default.

Oh, if you worry about ransomware, hope you never need to find this link useful: https://decrypter.emsisoft.com/

--A
Post Reply

Return to “Announcements + Suggestions + Q&A + Help”