Why apologize for killing charachters?
Posted: Wed May 02, 2018 4:38 pm
J.K. Rowling just apologized "again" for killing a character - my cheeky KW email which will just be for here - KW.
Dear J.K. Rowling
Please, please stop apologizing for killing characters. I know some of your readers were affected by the deaths of "favorite" characters. But isn't that the point? The point of a death of a relevant character in a story is to have an emotional impact. Beyond that though it should have some sort of connection to the rest of the story. The other characters feel something from that death and it has some degree of weight on their choices and/or feelings. If nothing else the death of a character gives the story in its own right another level of depth. Meaning - wow! the effects of this battle/war/confrontation have had some real effects! There is really some deep consequences for actions/inactions!
Thank you for your time,
Sam
Just my two cents. - Anyone else thoughts?
Dear J.K. Rowling
Please, please stop apologizing for killing characters. I know some of your readers were affected by the deaths of "favorite" characters. But isn't that the point? The point of a death of a relevant character in a story is to have an emotional impact. Beyond that though it should have some sort of connection to the rest of the story. The other characters feel something from that death and it has some degree of weight on their choices and/or feelings. If nothing else the death of a character gives the story in its own right another level of depth. Meaning - wow! the effects of this battle/war/confrontation have had some real effects! There is really some deep consequences for actions/inactions!
Thank you for your time,
Sam
Just my two cents. - Anyone else thoughts?