Glass
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 4:57 am
A long-standing hypothesis of movies, shared by many fans of movies and critics alike, is that sequels are, for the most part, not as good as the original movie. Usually this is because casting changes have occurred, the producers hired a different director to take the franchise in a different direction, the quality of the screenplay and/or directing does not rise to the level of the original movie, or the screenwriters painted themselves into a corner and they cannot move forward without ridiculous retcons or plot twists which make no sense.
Fortunately, Glass suffers from none of these shortcomings, making it a rare sequel which is just as good--some might even say better--when compared to its original movie. I never did manage to see Split, so I missed out on the full story between Kevin/The Horde/The Beast and Casey, but even without seeing it you aren't really left completely in the dark, presuming you know anything about Split at all, such as what the actress looks like and who her character is.
Shyamalan seems to have learned from his previous errors and isn't doing the whole "shocking plot twist which reframes the entire movie" thing anymore, which is probably a good thing--it worked the first two or three times but now it isn't new or refreshing any more. He also seems to have gotten over the adolescent "let's make the movie about me" schtick--see Lady in the Water to have that rubbed in your face. The movie does make you think a little about just who qualifies as "the good guy" and "the bad guy", though, so it definitely has that going for it.
Yes, some tropes still exist such as obvious use of color--David is green (often a life-affirming color), Kevin is yellow (used heavily in Hindu religious ceremonies), Elijah is purple (a color associated with majesty or royalty) but no movie can exist entirely without tropes.
All things considered, this is a movie worth seeing--it has stayed at the top of the box office returns for several weeks now, but some of that may also have to do with the pathetic movie offerings which are out right now. Still, I advise seeing it.
Fortunately, Glass suffers from none of these shortcomings, making it a rare sequel which is just as good--some might even say better--when compared to its original movie. I never did manage to see Split, so I missed out on the full story between Kevin/The Horde/The Beast and Casey, but even without seeing it you aren't really left completely in the dark, presuming you know anything about Split at all, such as what the actress looks like and who her character is.
Shyamalan seems to have learned from his previous errors and isn't doing the whole "shocking plot twist which reframes the entire movie" thing anymore, which is probably a good thing--it worked the first two or three times but now it isn't new or refreshing any more. He also seems to have gotten over the adolescent "let's make the movie about me" schtick--see Lady in the Water to have that rubbed in your face. The movie does make you think a little about just who qualifies as "the good guy" and "the bad guy", though, so it definitely has that going for it.
Yes, some tropes still exist such as obvious use of color--David is green (often a life-affirming color), Kevin is yellow (used heavily in Hindu religious ceremonies), Elijah is purple (a color associated with majesty or royalty) but no movie can exist entirely without tropes.
All things considered, this is a movie worth seeing--it has stayed at the top of the box office returns for several weeks now, but some of that may also have to do with the pathetic movie offerings which are out right now. Still, I advise seeing it.