How was Lord Foul winning?
Posted: Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:05 pm
This came up on the Reddit forum.
Everyone knows that Kevin enacted the ROD with Foul because he was mired in despair because LF "had the feller fist" and was winning the war. Kevin was desperate and latched onto the idea that the Ritual of Desecration might destroy Foul.
...but HOW was Foul winning? I know he had a huge host of beasts like kresh, ur-Viles, griffins, cavewights, etc.
BUT
-Foul had no Bane like the Illearth Stone at this time.
-The Ravers, while potent lackeys, could not possess Giants at this time.
-The Old Lords had mastery of all seven Wards.
-Kevin had the Staff of Law.
so...
How exactly did LF have the advantage? Sheer numbers made up for all the above points? I mean, surely Foul didn't ride into battle himself at the head of his forces as a-Jeroth the Black Knight??
Everyone knows that Kevin enacted the ROD with Foul because he was mired in despair because LF "had the feller fist" and was winning the war. Kevin was desperate and latched onto the idea that the Ritual of Desecration might destroy Foul.
...but HOW was Foul winning? I know he had a huge host of beasts like kresh, ur-Viles, griffins, cavewights, etc.
BUT
-Foul had no Bane like the Illearth Stone at this time.
-The Ravers, while potent lackeys, could not possess Giants at this time.
-The Old Lords had mastery of all seven Wards.
-Kevin had the Staff of Law.
so...
How exactly did LF have the advantage? Sheer numbers made up for all the above points? I mean, surely Foul didn't ride into battle himself at the head of his forces as a-Jeroth the Black Knight??
