Kevin's Watch

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2004 11:24 am**

I tralked this over with Ur-Vile last week. (My idea) What do you think?

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:34 pm**

We just need more people here to post in the Gap forum in order to generate enough interest for that to happen.

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2004 12:37 pm**

Well they've done a Mordents need one... And I think (But am not sure) that the Gap has more.

Posted: **Mon Jan 26, 2004 3:01 pm**

God-I knew this was going to happen! We're trying to restart the MN read and attract new members-we took a break to give the Reed Stephens read a chance to get off the ground. Please organize as much as u want but please give us a break until March at least.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:58 am**

Danlo, I'd prefer it myself that no such happened until much later - when we get more interest here and people have finished the other group reads. As mod of this forum, that's my position.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:03 am**

I don't think I ever considered the Gap series to be dissectable - is it?

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:28 am**

Sure - just don't give me one of the scientific interludes.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 5:51 am**

I would like to see this eventually happen, but beg you to wait until the other group reads are done. Would make life a lot easier...

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:15 am**

It certainly would. My brain is unraveling before my eyes as it is. But any time a Gap dissection starts, I'm there.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 10:11 am**

ditto

lol .. but i have barely time to visit let alone .. group reads .. lol .. it is fun to do any of the group read stuff .. but dunno when i will ever have time to begin a gap read

but i think it is a great idea

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:25 pm**

Actually Danlo... I suggested this to Ur-Vile before that new forum you mod was made.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:41 pm**

That's great Darth! And I wholeheartedly support any group reads. I never said I had a monopoly on them. A group read of the Gap sequence (as SRD calls it) was enivitable and will be a very important part of the Watch for years to come. I don't know what my new forum has to do with anything I would asked the same thing if the MN reads were still in MN discussions. We've been planning to reenergize them for over 2 months-all all was asking is that you please give us a month to get going again.

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:47 pm**

It's not up to me

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 2:57 pm**

by you I meant all concerned in creating the group read-wise guy

Posted: **Tue Jan 27, 2004 3:12 pm**

ok...

Posted: **Thu Jan 29, 2004 7:25 am**

Yeah, I have to agree with the main arguement that we currently have a lot of Group Reads going on. I think a Gap Read right now could be overkill. People can only group read so much. Maybe later on we can start one. Until then, let's just keep the Gap Forum active.-jay

Posted: **Thu Jan 29, 2004 10:23 am**

It's settled then

Posted: **Mon Feb 23, 2004 2:43 pm**

Shall we call it Crossing the Gap?

Posted: **Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:05 pm**

I have to agree. We still have 1 1/4 Mordant books, 1 3/4 TCTC books, and I don't know how many Reed Stephens books in the works right now. Then, of course, we'll have the first "Runes" book. But, if you could drag Tom, or some other person who's not locked into the current schedule, then by all means start now. I know I'd like to do "Daughter of Regals" & "Reave the Just", but I'm waiting until "Runes" is under way before I start harassing Jay and Danlo about that....

Posted: **Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:13 pm**

just thought i'd add my 2 pennies worth, i'd be up 4 helpin 2 dissect th gap, not finished reading them yet, 3/4 of the way thru book 5, v excitin stuff, altho i doubt i'd be very good at it, but i'd certainly give it a go

Kevin's Watch

Should we Dissect the Gap?

Should we Dissect the Gap?