Page 1 of 1
UH OH! An early review of CATWOMAN
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:23 pm
by aTOMiC
Gee wiz. My worst fears may have been realized. Of course we still need to hear from the rest of the critical world on the subject. In the mean time.....
www.filmjerk.com/nuke/article975.html
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:24 pm
by A Gunslinger
Are you suprised? Really? This movie has all the earmarks of a true unmitigated suck-fest.
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 8:26 pm
by aTOMiC
A Gunslinger wrote:Are you suprised? Really? This movie has all the earmarks of a true unmitigated suck-fest.
I am not in any way suprised. I saw this coming from the first moment I read about the plot and saw the idiotic costume. Now I know why Ashely Judd RAN away from this piece of crap.
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2004 11:40 pm
by matrixman
Maybe the lesson in all of this is to avoid any film directed by anyone whose name is a single word, especially any French director named "Pitof." (As in Pit of Crap?)
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:31 am
by Worm of Despite
www.rottentomatoes.com/m/catwoman/
Welcome, my friends, to the Battlefield Earth of superhero movies. Welcome to Catwoman.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:21 am
by aTOMiC
Thanks for the link, LF. What I don't get is how anyone could have posted a RIPE tomato on that site. The other 99% of reviewers can't all be totally out of their minds. If there had been even a sliver of a chance that I would have so much as rented a bargain VHS version of this piece of crap, those reviews just made it an impossibility.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:42 am
by dANdeLION
A Gunslinger wrote:Are you suprised? Really? This movie has all the earmarks of a true unmitigated suck-fest.
Earmanks. Heh. You know, with that stupid mask of hers, I think she should have been named "Mousegirl", or "Ratwoman", instead of ruining one of DC's (and comincs in general) best supporting characters.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 2:09 pm
by Revan
OMG!!! This is going to suck too bad... I might just have to cry.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:06 pm
by danlo
I told you before it was going to be Berry's Gigli. And when I heard Sharon Stone was going to be in it that signaled not only the "kiss of death" but the "French kiss of death". I haven't been impressed with Berry anyway--almost in Gotihka, but not in Monster's Ball. Unlike Kidman, who put three stellar prefomances together-before and after winning her Oscar (The Others, The Hours and Cold Mountian), Berry (like Will Smith) doesn't seem too concerned with any consistancy in her career. But (like Smith) she is laughing all the way to the bank!
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:33 pm
by dlbpharmd
Just looking at these 2 ultra-hot actresses may be worth the price of admission.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:43 pm
by aTOMiC
dlbpharmd wrote:Just looking at these 2 ultra-hot actresses may be worth the price of admission.
I'd prefer that we don't ecourage this kind film making with box office receipts. I hope they tank big time but I don't think I'll get that lucky.
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2004 4:54 pm
by duchess of malfi
Thank you Foul, for the link. Some of those reviews are hilarious.
"Catwoman meows, purrs, and hisses, but mostly just sucks."
-- Alex Sandell, JUICY CEREBELLUM
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 3:37 pm
by Old Darth
I don't understand how a movie studio can run with such a project when they must have heard all the negativity being expressed.
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 3:57 pm
by Revan
because they are, plain and simple, idiots.