The Mirror Of His Chronicles?
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2004 6:34 pm
One of the aspects of MN that becomes more in focus for me with each re-reading, is how in some ways it seems to serve as a mirror of TCOTC... almost as if SRD is exploring the same themes, but from the opposite direction.
For example: one of the major themes in both works is a question of 'reality':
In the Chronicles, a man is thrust into another world, and is faced with the question of whether the Land is real, or a figment of his imagination. In MN, a woman is drawn into another world, and is faced with the crisis of whether she herself is real, or the creation of another person's conjury.
Abuse and it's consequences:
The Chronicles features a man who becomes a rapist, and struggles to live with the consequences of his actions; MN features a woman who is the victim of emotional and physical abuse, and struggles to escape the consequences of her abusers' actions.
In the Chrons, a woman is raped by a friend - who does so from weakness, in the face of restored virility. In the Need, a man is raped - by an enemy, as a demonstration of power over him.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this? Agreements / disagreements? Does this even make sense?
For example: one of the major themes in both works is a question of 'reality':
In the Chronicles, a man is thrust into another world, and is faced with the question of whether the Land is real, or a figment of his imagination. In MN, a woman is drawn into another world, and is faced with the crisis of whether she herself is real, or the creation of another person's conjury.
Abuse and it's consequences:
The Chronicles features a man who becomes a rapist, and struggles to live with the consequences of his actions; MN features a woman who is the victim of emotional and physical abuse, and struggles to escape the consequences of her abusers' actions.
In the Chrons, a woman is raped by a friend - who does so from weakness, in the face of restored virility. In the Need, a man is raped - by an enemy, as a demonstration of power over him.
Anyone else have any thoughts on this? Agreements / disagreements? Does this even make sense?