Page 1 of 1

Is there a link between Zoroastrianism and TCTC?

Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 11:36 pm
by The Dreaming
I was reading up on ancient Zoroastrianism. This was the religion of the Persian Empire and was the first permanent monotheistic religion. It is also one of the parent religions of Christianity and Islam.

Anyway, it is the idea of creation that the Zoroastrians believe in that caught me. Ahura (the Wise Lord) created the entire world. He believed in the power of truth. (The Zoroastrians equate truth with goodness) However, he also created Ahriman (the Devil) and Ahriman chose the lie. Ahriman exists so that we may have choice, or free will.

Zoroastrianism was also among the first religions to have a concept of an eternal reward or punishment. (However, once in hell, redemption was possible). In the end, it was said by Zoroaster, that Ahura would conquer the lie and humanity would live in supreme happiness for the rest of eternity. (This was supposed to happen around 2600 ad)

It gets even more interesting. Here is a direct quote from one of my sources.
This dualist view eventually became the orthodox position. Its development may have owed much to the Magi, a hereditary priestly caste, although their role is unclear. From them, however, the Greco Roman world learned much of what it knew of the religion. An important reform movement, however, arose within Zoroastrianism - the movement around Zurvan. The Zurvanites posited a supreme god, Zurvan (Infinite Time), who had sacrificed for 1,000 years in order to gain offspring. At the end of that time he experienced momentary doubt, and from that doubt arose Ahriman; at the same time, Ormazd came into being because of the efficacy of the sacrifices. At the end of 3,000 years Ahriman crossed the void that separated them and attacked Ormazd. The two made a pact to limit the struggle, and Ahriman fell back into the abyss, where he lay for 3,000 years.

During that period Ormazd created the material and spiritual world; in retaliation, Ahriman called into being six demons and an opposing material world. In the next 3,000 year period Ahriman attempted to corrupt the creation of Ormazd; he was successful but was trapped in the world of light. The final period of 3,000 years was ushered in by the birth of Zoroaster, who revealed this struggle to man; the prophet is to be followed by three saviors, appearing at intervals of 1,000 years. At the appearance of the last, a day of judgment will occur, the drink of immortality will be offered to those who have fought against Ahriman, and a new creation will be established.
This dualistic idea sounded very familiar to me, and only today did I realize that the relationship between Ahura and Ahriman sounds very much like the relationship between the Creator and Lord Foul.

I further discovered that the vast majority of modern Zoroastrians live in India, where Donaldson grew up. Do you suppose that the theology of the land is in any way influenced by this Theology?

Edit: Said Covenant and meant Creator

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:18 am
by Avatar
Perhaps, but these "similarities" are, as you say, also foundations of most modern religions, especially christainity, as well.

Although these parrallels can effectively be drawn, they can probably be drawn from a christian interpretation as well. Most religions are incestuous to some degree.

--Avatar

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:27 am
by The Dreaming
It was the Idea of evil created as well as good that caught me. The Christian story for the origin of Lucifer is a far cry from the origin of Ahriman. Evil was created because it had to exist for humanity to have free will.

It was the later bit about where Zoroastrianism went in it's later years that espacially caught my eye. Ahriman (evil) managed to corrupt the creation of Ormazd (the same being as Ahura and the Creator), however, to do so he was trapped in the world of light.

This and the fact that the modern Zoroastrians are all in India put it into my head.

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:59 am
by Avatar
IIRC, the origin of Lucifer in christianity was a relatively late addition to the overall story.

I certainly see your points of similarity to the Chronicles, and follow your reasoning. Whether or not the similarity was intentional is a different question.

Good to see you back, BTW. ;)

--Avatar

Posted: Mon Dec 13, 2004 4:00 pm
by Alynna Lis Eachann
Great question for SRD's Gradual Interview, no? Perhaps you could submit it and report back?

I see the parallels here... the "3000 year" bit especially. It would be interesting to find out if Donaldson consciously or subconsciously inserted aspects of Zoroastrianism into TCTC.

Posted: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:10 am
by Avatar
Alynna Lis Eachann wrote:Great question for SRD's Gradual Interview, no? Perhaps you could submit it and report back?
Just what I was thinking. :)

--A