Page 1 of 1

Philosophy and The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:41 pm
by Ser_Visal
(Hey, if there can be a "Philosophy and The Simpsons"....?)

My point is this: There is a similarity between Lord Mhoram's realization of the inherent weakness of the Oath of Peace and Frederick Nietzsche's views of Christianity. Mhoram discovered that holding to the Oath prevented the new Lords from fully tapping the power of Kevin's lore. Nietzsche believed that the "turn the other cheek" pacifism of Christianity (that is, Christianity as Jesus preached it, but too rarely actually seen today) artificially sapped human beings of their natural strength and capacity for power. Only by shedding some of the purer aspects of the Oath of Peace was Mhoram able to defeat Satansfist.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 9:14 am
by drew
Yes, but don't forget, Mhoram went on to find new lore so that he could keep a promice of peace.

Posted: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:09 pm
by Avatar
Both good point's I think, and as we've mentioned in another thread, Nietzsche's views were intended to allow us to create a better society, with, as LoreMaster mentioned in that other thread, a more "noble" humanity.

Of course, the methods he appears to have advocated are open to debate.

--Avatar

Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:21 pm
by Warmark
(Hey, if there can be a "Philosophy and The Simpsons"....?)
I just found that book in the library today - read it for ten minutes, got bored and went home and watched a very funny episode instead.

Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 4:46 pm
by Zarathustra
There is a similarity between Lord Mhoram's realization of the inherent weakness of the Oath of Peace and Frederick Nietzsche's views of Christianity.
This is an excellent point. Nietzsche believed that moral systems like Christianity robbed people of their full potential, placing their values beyond this life. He believed that religion and morality were created by the Weak to limit the Strong, to give collective groups of powerless people the power to "reign in" those who wanted to kill them, rape them, take their wives, etc. It was a way to control people's behavior, to instill in them a sense of guilt that modified their actions.

This is perfectly analogous to the Oath of Peace: something that limits one's natural passions and behaviors in the name of doing "good." But it is a form of self-denial. One's passions are real; they are a real part of us. True, they can lead us to do bad things, but nothing is worse than denying who you are, and in effect denying reality (because you will then be ill-equipped to identify the danger).

The danger of Christian-like morals (according to Nietzsche) was that they were not true to the earth, but rather based on an other-worldly realm. All value is placed beyond the grave, beyond this body, beyond this physical world. In this manner, it is life-denying because all the really important stuff (Heaven, afterlife, mansion in the sky, streets of gold, etc.) are supposed to be outside of this life on earth. Thus, it devalues this life as nothing more than a test to see if you qualify for the REAL "life."

Nietzsche wanted people to realize that we can choose values that are life-affirming, that affirmed this world, this life, this body, this existence. We can affirm our nature, celebrate our nature, and be good at the same time. We can live in a world where we realize there is no Creator other than ourselves, and still be decent and sane. We are the creator--we create our own values. We are our own law-giver, enforcer, and judge. The responsibility is ours, not some mythical being watching over us.

Similarly, Covenant is his own creator and his own despiser. He can choose which way to go, and by his actions save or damn the world (just as we can save or damn our own planet). Waiting for angels or god to save us from ourselves is just like hoping that Lore can defeat Lord Foul. It can't. Only wild magic (our unrestrained passions) can defeat it. If we restrain our passions with an Oath of Peace or other-worldly morality, then we will not be equipped to face Despite, because it arises within us. If we think of reality as a battle between an external Satan and an external God, then we'll be powerless against Despite because we'll fail to recognize it within ourselves. It's a personal, internal battle. The only despite you can master is your own--and you can only do it if you don't limit your passions and if you don't hide from the truth: both of which are affects of religious morality and the Oath of Peace.

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 10:07 am
by Avatar
Excellent post.

--A

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2005 11:48 am
by Mr. Majestic
Malik23 wrote:Similarly, Covenant is his own creator and his own despiser. He can choose which way to go, and by his actions save or damn the world (just as we can save or damn our own planet). Waiting for angels or god to save us from ourselves is just like hoping that Lore can defeat Lord Foul. It can't. Only wild magic (our unrestrained passions) can defeat it. If we restrain our passions with an Oath of Peace or other-worldly morality, then we will not be equipped to face Despite, because it arises within us. If we think of reality as a battle between an external Satan and an external God, then we'll be powerless against Despite because we'll fail to recognize it within ourselves. It's a personal, internal battle. The only despite you can master is your own--and you can only do it if you don't limit your passions and if you don't hide from the truth: both of which are affects of religious morality and the Oath of Peace.
I found your post quite intriguing, but for reasons you may not have considered.

The Book of Romans speaks directly about a personal, internal battle. The Apostle Paul is seen berating himself for making mistakes and that it seems like even though he knows what right is, he still makes wrong choices. Christianity is about faith. If we “KNEW” God existed we’d shape up our lives very well. We can all behave quite nicely at work, for instance. But Revelation talks about a time when people will “KNOW” God exists and they’ll still choose to rebel against Him & join Satan in the final war. That war doesn’t last very long by the way.

What I’m saying is that I see answers like “the devil made me do it” to be 99% nonsense. Just like I see that a lot of “God told me what to do” to be nonsense. Not because God doesn’t interact with us, but rather that most people aren’t aware of how that works and so they make stuff up. Satan also interacts with us; it’s just that it is in ways that people aren’t even aware about. Regardless, I believe that Christians make rational moral choices about how to act, just like non-Christians. But maybe you’re missing something about the lore of this world, just maybe.

Consider that weakened Christians have power and that for the sake of the argument that it is very diluted, because of a kind of oath of peace in Christianity, and mostly because the miracle-like powerful lore of the early Church has been forgotten. And not merely forgotten, but completely out of step with how we live our lives and no longer comprehendible. I saw a movie that stated how people felt about the end of the world in the 14th century. The statement was, “Back then people felt the end of the world was the ultimate day off, not the ultimate off day.”

So let’s say that Christians are weak in their lore. Despite the sensational news about high profile cases, I’m quite certain that Christians commit less grievous sins than non-Christians. In our prison systems, if you would take a poll of how many Christians vs. non-Christians raped, killed, etc., then I’m quite sure that you would find there to be a huge difference. It’s not simply a guilt sensation that steers someone away from robbing a liquor store. Christians want to be a good example, they want to act well for their heavenly Father. Not because they need to, because heaven is a gift not something people are required to work at. They accept it. That’s it. That’s all. I think that interacting with an external God for our internal struggles gives us strength.

I think that the issue isn’t that the lore is weak. I think the real issue is that the lore is real. People have sensations in the spirit that are hard to explain. Missionaries have experiences with near starvation & right when they feel they’re at their wits end, a food drop comes in, or a check from someone that hadn’t written in a long time. And although coincidental on the outside, in a Christian’s life these coincidences start building up to impossible numbers of “coincidences”. A Christian might pray for an answer to a problem and an idea comes to mind. Was it planted? Or perhaps a person calls on the telephone immediately after the prayer and states the answer without being prompted. These things happen constantly to a Christian who believes in Jesus as the Son of God. There is real magic for Christians.

And the funny thing about your comparison to the Thomas Covenant books is that those people generally didn’t feel powerful. The general population could do miraculous things, but it wasn’t as if everyone was lining up to watch. It was common.

Also, understand that society and public education are constantly telling us that religion is false and while people write books and have opinions about why God doesn’t exist you have to wonder why so many people do believe. I have an interesting thought that most people who are evil don’t believe themselves to be evil. Perhaps the Urviles and Cavewights think they’re doing the right thing by standing on the side of who seems most likely to win. Maybe in our own way, a lot of non-believers don’t want to believe because they aren’t willing to look at the beauty of the Land or of those that practice the oath of peace. Maybe to the servants of the illearth stone it is sort of like taking a stand on abortion as a woman’s right to choose. Maybe that’s warped thinking and they just don’t know it because they can’t see the use of practicing arts of power that don’t appear very powerful by comparison because they aren’t destructive.

Anyway, food for thought.

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 1:42 pm
by Zarathustra
Mr. Majestic,

Your post is a defense of Christianity. I wasn't attacking Christianity, but comparing it to the Chronicles. I don't think that my comparison is very far off; in other words, I think that this is close to what Donalson had in mind when he wrote it. If you read his comments closely (in the GI, for instance) you will see that he doesn't think highly of Christianity.

I don't really want to turn this into a religious discussion. However, I'll make a few quick comments.
Despite the sensational news about high profile cases, I’m quite certain that Christians commit less grievous sins than non-Christians.
This is pure speculation. Until you do a study and actually compare people's behavior, you literally have no idea. Besides, "sin" isn't usually something people do right out in the open. This is just your opinion.
A Christian might pray for an answer to a problem and an idea comes to mind. Was it planted? Or perhaps a person calls on the telephone immediately after the prayer and states the answer without being prompted. These things happen constantly to a Christian who believes in Jesus as the Son of God. There is real magic for Christians.
I have a hard time believing that God performs "magic," as you say, to help Christians find an answer to a problem, but meanwhile lets children starve to death in Africa. I know people who thank Jesus when they find a good parking spot, as if God himself reserved the spot for them. How can an all-powerful being involve himself in the trivial details of some people's lives, but leave others to suffer and die? This kind of belief system is bizarre to me.
Also, understand that society and public education are constantly telling us that religion is false . . .
Never once in my public education did anyone ever tell me religion is false. If fact, many school systems are trying to change the definition of science in order to include creation mythology as a valid scientific hypothesis.

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2005 6:07 pm
by CovenantJr
If anyone wants to pick up that thread, The Close is the place for it.
Malik23 wrote:If we think of reality as a battle between an external Satan and an external God, then we'll be powerless against Despite because we'll fail to recognize it within ourselves. It's a personal, internal battle. The only despite you can master is your own--and you can only do it if you don't limit your passions and if you don't hide from the truth
:goodpost: