Reaction

Free discussion of anything human or divine ~ Philosophy, Religion and Spirituality

Moderator: Fist and Faith

Post Reply
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Reaction

Post by Avatar »

People's reaction to you depends largely on your reaction to them.
A particularly apt point in the context of the internet, forums, and the largely faceless communication that we do our best at.

In this world of impersonal appearing text, do we take fully into account the fact that reaction is just that? Reaction. Response to another action. Response to positive or negative stimuli.

In providing the stimuli, we control, or at least have a significant effect, on the reaction that follows. By choosing your action, you go a fair way to dictating what the responding action will be.

Conversely, we can equally choose how to react to a given stimuli in the sense that I'm talking about. And controlling your reaction has the knock-on effect of influencing the responding action.

What do you think? :)

--A
User avatar
Phantasm
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1720
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2005 10:52 pm
Location: Cumbernauld, Scotland

Post by Phantasm »

To a certain extent, reaction to a certain stimulus is almost a natural thing.

e.g. to keep away from big spiders, pull your hand away from something hot.

In relation to other people, the reaction you get is almost certainly in response to the stimuli you present to that person. Although sometimes you might not get the reaction you expected for any number of reasons ( a recent bereavement, intoxification, or just having a bad day).

In the same vein of thought, the reaction you give to others is most likely to be in response to the stimuli you have recieved.

Add to the fact that we are generally quite good at reading non verbal stimuli, and you can see that the human mind is facinating object, programmed to respond to millions of different situations.


As for internet chat rooms/forums, you are bereft of the visual clues which tell you what people might really be thinking, despite what they say, so you are at a disadvantage there - but I suppose that's what we've got "smillies" for :D
Quote - John Smeaton (Terrorists take note)

"This is Glasgow- we'll just set aboot ye"



Image
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Re: Reaction

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

Avatar wrote:
People's reaction to you depends largely on your reaction to them.

What do you think? :)

--A

I think that's very accurate, at least as far as first impressions go.
After that, once friendship kicks in it's not very true, imo.

A good example is this:
I had a job interview today.
I HATE job interviews because I turn from my usual "so laid back people think you're dead" persona into a quivering nonthinking mess.

I could tell the man interviewing me wasn't comfortable with me in the beginning.
Because he was reacting to what I was giving him, nervousness.

Luckily I realized this and told him I was a horrible interviewee and I relaxed a little.
I could see the change in his attitude toward me after that.

Hopefully I made a good impression.
I'm probably one of the best employees anyone could ever have but I suck so bad at interviewing I wouldn't even hire myself!

Now conversely my best freind and I greet each other with sickening verbal abuse hurled at each other.
Wait....maybe that's the same as above :lol:
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

Ugh, yeah interviews suck. Had one on Tuesday, another one on the 8th. I don't really get nervous, but I don't like being judged. And one instance, I actually saw the thought process that made the interviewer misconstrue something I said. I could tell there's a certain way he looked at the situation, so he responded to what I said in that framework. And I really don't like the dynamic that prevents me from correcting him about it.

Strange thing is, I pretty much nailed the interview (well, half and half. sometimes I felt like I was losing him) as well as an electronics practice test (that they never looked at!), but my suit... Let's just say that looking at everyone else there for the interview, I realized I better have a new one for the next one.

And it's weird. I don't wear anything remotely resembling a suit nor will I ever wear a suit in my job, yet I have to go out and spend $200, a substantial piece of an unemployed person's savings, to get one.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

Syl wrote:Ugh, yeah interviews suck. Had one on Tuesday, another one on the 8th. I don't really get nervous, but I don't like being judged. And one instance, I actually saw the thought process that made the interviewer misconstrue something I said. I could tell there's a certain way he looked at the situation, so he responded to what I said in that framework. And I really don't like the dynamic that prevents me from correcting him about it.
You know what would make a good reality TV show?
An interview show set up like American Idol or something.
I don't know how they could do it but it would be interesting to see how people are before, during and then after the interview.

Syl wrote:Strange thing is, I pretty much nailed the interview (well, half and half. sometimes I felt like I was losing him) as well as an electronics practice test (that they never looked at!), but my suit... Let's just say that looking at everyone else there for the interview, I realized I better have a new one for the next one.

And the sad thing was that you probably *were* judged by what you were wearing.
My current job is extremely casual: jeans, sneakers and fleece tops are fine.
The job I interviewed for was pretty much the same, but I *knew* that if I didn't "suit up" it would hurt me.

Syl wrote:And it's weird. I don't wear anything remotely resembling a suit nor will I ever wear a suit in my job, yet I have to go out and spend $200, a substantial piece of an unemployed person's savings, to get one.
You know what I did?
The night before my interview I realized that I hadn't worn anything "professional" in several years and everything looked like old man clothes.
So I went out to Target and bought a basic blue sport jacket, white shirt and khaki pants.
I only spent $50 and although I'm not going to be photographed for GQ anytime soon I looked great for an interview.

Good luck , btw.
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

I will hopefully never have to interview again, but I think I'll wear the kilt if I do. Then I'll keep crossing and uncrossing my legs like in Basic Instinct.

Maybe I'll just go on interviews for fun.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

Cail wrote:I will hopefully never have to interview again, but I think I'll wear the kilt if I do. Then I'll keep crossing and uncrossing my legs like in Basic Instinct.

Maybe I'll just go on interviews for fun.
People's reaction to you depends largely on your reaction to them.
Be prepared, my friend, be prepared.

:lol: 8O :o :lol: :P
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

That was damn funny, HLT (and Cail).
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
Plissken
Lord
Posts: 7617
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 5:24 pm
Location: Just Waiting

Post by Plissken »

My most recent interview was pretty much, "You want the job?"

I did, so I said, "Yes."

It was a tough quiz, but I aced it.
“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
-- James Madison

"If you're going to tell people the truth, you'd better make them laugh. Otherwise they'll kill you." - George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

:LOLS: Well this went in an unusual direction, didn't it? :D

I hate interviews too. My last one, nearly two years ago for this job, was a nice easy one. I wore what I've only ever worn to work: Jeans and a t-shirt, because I came to it straight from the temp job I was doing (IT Support) at the time.

Luckily, the guy interviewing me was wearing the same thing. ;) If I have to go smart, black slacks and a button-up collarless shirt are the most I'll do. (Can't stand collars and ties...symbolically hanging yourself every day before leaving for work...*shudder*)

To get back to what Phantasm was saying though,
Although sometimes you might not get the reaction you expected for any number of reasons ( a recent bereavement, intoxification, or just having a bad day).
This is part of what I was saying when I said that regardless of the reaction you get back, your reaction to that can still affect the "counter-reaction" as it were.

A soft answer turneth away wrath and all that. The reason I bring it up in the context of a forum is really the amount of times we see somebody react negatively to something, and then the counter-reaction is more negative, and things degenerate rapidly after that.

All it can take to halt the downward spiral
is for a single person to make the decision to control their reaction.

Why is it that this seems so difficult sometimes? What is it that attempts to trap us in the repeating cycle of reaction, rather than of action?

Phantasm's point about the reaction you give depending on the stimuli you recieve is a good one. But that's where you have the opportunity to break the chain. React positively in spite of negative stimuli, and the counter-reaction will be more positive as well.

Of course, there are always exceptions, some people just deliberately want trouble, but in all other cases, it's merely a case of reaction, and usually thoughtless reaction at that.

--A
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

I'll have to agree with HLT: To begin with a simple action-reaction response is expected, but even in a faceless environment such as this you build acquaintances, and you very quickly get biased toward peoples names (or even avatars). As a result I would not answer the exact same words the same way, if it came from people that I had different opinions of.
Avatar wrote:Of course, there are always exceptions, some people just deliberately want trouble.
Not being much of a slugger, I do enjoy a lively verbal fist fight now and then, but I usually only enter one if provoked.
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
lucimay
Lord
Posts: 15045
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Mott Wood, Genebakis
Contact:

Post by lucimay »

this is an interesting topic for me...

it drives me crazy to be misunderstood...and i can usually SEE that happening on someones face when they are talking to me...i'm not so articulate that i can make myself understood without miles and miles of explanation...then i see the boredom set in as i try to make myself understood...my husband and my boss particularly have short attention spans and so just eventually tune out as i attempt to make myself understood (my shrink said i was "hypervigilant"! hahahaha!!)
i dread the boredom reaction to my overexplaining but have come to expect it...

i have learned to ask, in forum and in face to face conversations, if i am being understood, or if i don't understand someone else...

regarding interviews...about 10 years ago i decided to hell with it...i do NOT want to present myself in job interviews as something i'm not. i can't do it anymore...even if i WANT the job badly...so i started going to job interviews dressed as myself!! usually solid color longsleeved crew neck cotton shirts or t shirts, jeans...not ripped up ones or that grungy greasy look that's so prevalent now, just regular jeans...or these pull on sort of stretcy yoga pants that i've found that look okay as street clothes, sensible shoes like oxford bucs or quiet sneakers...not the kind with all the loud colors and crap on them... anyway...i stopped "dressing up" for interviews...and i stopped all the phoney schmoney i'm here to impress you patter in interviews that you do when you're all nervous...just started looking at the interviewers as people rather than as someone who held my LIFE in their hands...asking THEM questions like, do you like working here, how long have YOU been here, do you guys do pot lucks and employee birthday celebrations, etc...

i had 3 interviews like that...i figured if they didn't like me the way i was, i didn't want to work with them anyway...it worked out well for me...the third interview was with Beren Shoes...where i have been for the last nine years!!
you're more advanced than a cockroach,
have you ever tried explaining yourself
to one of them?
~ alan bates, the mothman prophecies



i've had this with actors before, on the set,
where they get upset about the [size of my]
trailer, and i'm always like...take my trailer,
cause... i'm from Kentucky
and that's not what we brag about.
~ george clooney, inside the actor's studio



a straight edge for legends at
the fold - searching for our
lost cities of gold. burnt tar,
gravel pits. sixteen gears switch.
Haphazard Lucy strolls by.
~ dennis r wood ~
User avatar
Lord Mhoram
Lord
Posts: 9512
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2002 1:07 am

Post by Lord Mhoram »

All I know is that it is fun to piss people off on the Internet.
User avatar
Prebe
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 7926
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: People's Republic of Denmark

Post by Prebe »

LM wrote:All I know is that it is fun to piss people off on the Internet.
Your darn right it is!
"I would have gone to the thesaurus for a more erudite word."
-Hashi Lebwohl
User avatar
The Laughing Man
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9033
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:56 pm
Location: LMAO

Post by The Laughing Man »

it is? :roll:
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Prebe wrote:To begin with a simple action-reaction response is expected...
What I'm saying though is that, except in some circumstances, an action/response is what you get, even if you don't realise it.

(And I too have a penchant for long and complicated explanations LuciMay. ;) )

--A
Post Reply

Return to “The Close”