
Well this went in an unusual direction, didn't it?
I hate interviews too. My last one, nearly two years ago for this job, was a nice easy one. I wore what I've only ever worn to work: Jeans and a t-shirt, because I came to it straight from the temp job I was doing (IT Support) at the time.
Luckily, the guy interviewing me was wearing the same thing.

If I have to go smart, black slacks and a button-up collarless shirt are the most I'll do. (Can't stand collars and ties...symbolically hanging yourself every day before leaving for work...*shudder*)
To get back to what Phantasm was saying though,
Although sometimes you might not get the reaction you expected for any number of reasons ( a recent bereavement, intoxification, or just having a bad day).
This is part of what I was saying when I said that regardless of the reaction you get back, your reaction to
that can still affect the "counter-reaction" as it were.
A soft answer turneth away wrath and all that. The reason I bring it up in the context of a forum is really the amount of times we see somebody react negatively to something, and then the counter-reaction is more negative, and things degenerate rapidly after that.
All it can take to halt the downward spiral
is for a single person to make the decision to control their reaction.
Why is it that this seems so difficult sometimes? What is it that attempts to trap us in the repeating cycle of reaction, rather than of action?
Phantasm's point about the reaction you give depending on the stimuli you recieve is a good one. But that's where you have the opportunity to break the chain. React positively in spite of negative stimuli, and the counter-reaction will be more positive as well.
Of course, there are always exceptions, some people just deliberately want trouble, but in all other cases, it's merely a case of reaction, and usually thoughtless reaction at that.
--A