Second that.

he did observe that the DNA of children is more pure than adults Amazing! And AGAIN I learn something new and valuable. If the internetz had been around when I went to university, I'm not even sure I would have bothered to go. Jehovas Wittnesses once told me that the dna of Adam and Eve was more pu...

Ron-B on liberals wrote:Not crazy. Just more inclined to fetishize intentions and ignore outcomes.

Ron wrote:Prebe, I think a meme / stereotype only matters if the object finds it important

I had a long sarcastic rant written on that one, but I decided to give you one last chance to think about why that is just plain wrong.

Edit: I.o.w. I decided to skip sarcastic and go straight to patronizing

Spolling Weren't me. That was some dude named Euler.

Stoopid.

I think he did the right thing actually. Not doing it could easily be morally defended, but none the less I think it was a pretty cool thing to do. The only thing that will ever make stereotypes disapear is not using them. No matter what the reason may be for debating/satirizing/applying them, the m...

DeerOD wrote:There are lots of other possible DNA sources. Fecal matter often contains blood from the donor. Skin cells might have been gleaned when a sasquatch wounded itself. There is dna in saliva, boogers, semen

Thanks for the info. I'll try to keep that in mind

Prebe, you are displaying part of the reason I hold you in such affection I aims to please miss Daisy ;) And in this case - due to a superfluous 'h' - it seems that I have provided more pleasing than originally intended. if I may be allowed to use such a term without starting the obvious avalanche ...

maybe you could say that the ones who bothers to argue online with strangers over meaningless conceptual politics are the ones who cares the most and are the least humourful on both sides With the risk of sounding boring, I'm not really arguing. I'm offering possible sociological mechanisms for an ...

liberals take politics and themselves more seriously". I hope that was satire Not at all. Would you disagree that there tends to be general personality traits (on average) related the most extreme political ideologies? If you agree on that, all I have done is to intrapolate toward the middle o...

I suggest that if indeed a difference exists between liberals and conservatives when it comes to the propensity to unfriend their political adversaries, the mechanism could be that perhaps liberals (on average) invest a greater part of their life, personality and feelings into their political ideals...

oops! Utterly sorry Farsailer! I got you confused with the other maritime nickname Soulbiter. So, SOulbiter: You haven't commented on my links to the Discovery Institute, The Wedge Strategy and The Santorum Amendment. Do you not believe it, or do you agree with Santorums affiliations or is there a t...

I'm not in the least surprised. I'm just trying to answer a question that Ron posed. I'm not quite sure where you are going with your post though, given the context.

...oh I'm sorry. You were finished? :lol: Yes, I was saying something about the best intentions. I think it is the explicit solidarity that makes even far flung leftists' messages easier to swallow and/or condone. Why? Because disagreeing with solidarity is generally frowned upon. Now, the implicati...

That century never happened. The Soviet Union never happend. It's a lie cooked up by nazis! Oh, wait....

Ron wrote:Even if people disagree [with liberals], they are likely to give points for 'sincerity' or 'good intentions.'

That's because they are sincere and have good intentions

Don't know Sarge, but afaik the whole 2012 bruhaha was started because some git found a Mayan calendar that only went as far as to (what he thought) was 2012 AD

^^Hippie!

Farsailer:
You haven't commented on my links to the Discovery Institute, The Wedge Strategy and The Santorum Amendment. Do you not believe it, or do you agree with Santorums affiliations or is there a third option that I'm not seeing?