Let's pretend we're in the Close

[Cord Hurn]

It is if you believe it is.

And what is your authority for such a statement? Is this not the elevation of pop-psych to canon without notification? A premise x-nihilo?

I find your assumption disturbing and lacking proper consideration. It is an established fact that belief is congruent with lifeforms possessed of the five established multi-capable intellects. There is no distinction between life-drama and the elevated state of light-living so long as one is at peace with humankind's place in our three-dimensional world-gap. The clearly, obvious layers through which believers ascend through the spiritual cloud mass of reality is apparent to anyone that bother's to pay attention to the under-field of perception.

These are readily apparent truths not idle speculations and I'll thank you to be more open minded and accepting of spectral cascade divisions.

I can't decide if this point of view is X-istential, or not. If I manage to figure out that it IS X-istential, of course I'll support it!!

[Skyweir]

Hahahahaha RFLMAO!!

Touche!!!
Well played - (the initiative of this game is highly entertaining, historically speaking the world has always need more laughter and less prigs lol - unsourced)

[deer of the dawn]

historically speaking the world has always need more laughter and less prigs lol - unsourced)

This is just the kind of unfounded, spontaneous, anti-intellectual, feel-goody statement that erodes the pursuit of Truth, as we define it. Where is the argument in this statement? How is anyone supposed to oppose such a position? How anti-Priggish of you! I suppose you would have us put on music, and dance, and just get along??!

As for Tom's statement, I don't even know where to begin. You think truth just descends like rain from some spiritual realm?? YOu would think that some God just made up truth and pours it out in some profligate precipitation? No! We have to sit around and figure it out ourselves!

(btw Tom, kudos! That rocked!! )

[Skyweir]

This is just the kind of unfounded, spontaneous, anti-intellectual, feel-goody statement that erodes the pursuit of Truth, as we define it. Where is the argument in this statement? How is anyone supposed to oppose such a position? How anti-Priggish of you! I suppose you would have us put on music, and dance, and just get along??!

HAHhahaHAHA
I could be in either the Close or the Think Tank right now I just cant tell

I am honour bound to concede to your deleterious and dare I say contradictory observations regarding my arguably (well admittedly) unsourced, unsupported and allegedly outrageous comments. And mmm if we all got on where would that leave the Close or the Think Tank?

[Cord Hurn]

[Too X-hausted to argue about this now. Good night, all!]

[sgt.null]

Gilbert Keith Chesterton KC*SG
(29 May 1874 – 14 June 1936)
was an English writer, philosopher,
Christian apologist, and literary
and art critic. He has been referred
to as the "prince of paradox". Of
his writing style, Time observed:
"Whenever possible Chesterton
made his points with popular
sayings, proverbs, allegories—
first carefully turning them inside out."

[Cord Hurn]

Priggish: 20 Synonyms
__________________

prudish
staid
puritanical
straitlaced
stuffy
straightlaced
prim
virtuous
genteel
Victorian
nice-nelly
bluenosed
moral
proper
righteous
refined
upright
decent
honest
right

[sgt.null]

Claire McCarthy's 2018 film, Shakespeare's play Hamlet of John Everett Millais' panting of the same name.

Starring Daisy Ridley and George Mackay as Hamlet, the film of Shakespeare's masterpiece, Clive Owen as Claudius. and Naomi Watts in a dual role as Gertrude and a local witch. Polonius' famous scene with Laertes room more of Shakespeare's marvelous text.

All that blue of Ophelia's dress or the flash of a red ribbon. but I wouldn't have missed it.

[Cord Hurn]

I just now decided to X-hume the thread with the bump from this wee little post. At this moment, it felt like a religious duty to get this thread a little more attention.