(emphasis mine)First_Mark_Bannor wrote:The only book i re-read (which was actully read outloud to me when i was tiny) was harry potter 1-3 :b
Why does this make me feel old??



Moderator: I'm Murrin
(emphasis mine)First_Mark_Bannor wrote:The only book i re-read (which was actully read outloud to me when i was tiny) was harry potter 1-3 :b
I agree with you there. If a book's not worth rereading, it goes straight into the box for the Salvation Army. Normally I hate giving up books like that, and sometimes I make mistakes...once upon a time, I thought I could never reread the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, and gave them away.gyrehead wrote:I probably reread just about every fantasy that I like. That is actually part of the criteria in determing whether I like a book. Whether I think it is worthy of being re-read.
It is very very rare that I give away books. Very. I even have the first three of Goodkind and the Weis and Hickman books packed away somewhere. Maybe it is fear that the world as we know it will come to an end and I'll face another thirty or forty years of reading with nothing new to enjoy!Myste wrote:I agree with you there. If a book's not worth rereading, it goes straight into the box for the Salvation Army. Normally I hate giving up books like that, and sometimes I make mistakes...once upon a time, I thought I could never reread the Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, and gave them away.gyrehead wrote:I probably reread just about every fantasy that I like. That is actually part of the criteria in determing whether I like a book. Whether I think it is worthy of being re-read.But for the most part, I've gotten very good at knowing when I'm going to bother rereading something or not, and adjusting my bookshelves accordingly...