While reading the Gap, I have always tried to figure out how exactly they "think". Or why they behave and go about doing what they do.
For example, how do Pheromones influence their behaviour, what significance do they play? Why don’t they use pro-nouns such as “I” or “Me”, except when they are an incomplete Amnioni with human characterises?
All of these questions have been asked before within the books, I am merely repeating them so my point may be understood.
They are genetically coded to behave the way they do, yet this in itself brings forth more questions; does it mean they have no minds of their own? They are merely slaves to how the genetic material is formed? Is that why they don’t use such words as “I”? Is it, in fact, they have no personality or individual thoughts that are not already “programmed” into their genetic material?
This supports and denies both explanations that are offered to us in the excellently written Ancillary Documentation.
The "Hive-mind" is the first explanation we are offered;
One postulated what was sometimes called a 'hive mind'. Drawing analogies from certain species of insects, this theory suggested that all Amnion partook of a communal intelligence which has it's physical centre or nexus, it's 'queen', somewhere deep in alien space. Individual members or units of this mind had a separate corporeal being, but no separate thoughts or volition: instead each was effectively a neuron or ganglion of the hive mind, transmitting data inward - and action outward.
The second explanation:
Which theory is true, do you think?The opposing hypothesis held that the Amnion were driven, not by a collective intelligence or hive mind, but by the essential coding of the nucleotides which comprised their RNA. They have no human-like abstract concepts for the same reason that they have no human-like pronouns: they needed none. Their imperialism was genetic in content as well as in form; in inspiration as well as in effect. Commandments analogous to the human lust for reproduction impelled their actions. They were unified and moved by impulses at once more profound, more global and more imaginable than the directive of some impossibly distant - as well as impossible homogeneous - 'queen'
I really am not sure; though I would lean closer to the latter explanation than the former. There is heavy evidence that supports this theory.
The first is the Mind/Union.
What is this? What does it mean, and what duties does this 'Mind/Union' perform?
I will give you a couple of quotes that mention, and give us some abstract clue as to what the 'Mind/Union' of the Amnion is:
Sorus:
'Damn it,' she objected, knowing that objection was hopeless, 'you're days away from getting a message to the Mind/Union. How can you take a risk like this on your own? How do you know the Mind/Union will approve?'
Notice that "in relation to the Mind/Union". What does that exactly mean? Does it suggest that the Mind/Union doesn't change or interfere with decisions that other Amnioni have made? Surely if their was a queen, the Amnion would need to know what and how she would act.'To "approve",' he (Marc) added, 'is not a concept which has meaning in relation to the Mind/Union.'
(I am aware I'm asking a lot of questions, and not offering many answers... this is just a post of my thoughts)
Another factor opposing the Queen theory is distance. Surely distance plays a part of the 'hold' the queen has on her separate units?
From one of the quotes above:
Ah, but Marc Vestabule does have separate thoughts and volition; he is as impelled as any Amnioni in their goals, but his remaining human memories allows him to take action and think differently than any other Amnion; for example, when he intends to apply the mutagen to Warden:Individual members or units of this mind had a separate corporeal being, but no separate thoughts or volition
As you see, Marc took proposed to take action that no other Amnion could take, which directly opposes the theory of the 'hive mind'.'It is a handicap for us that we do not understand deceit. Lies are not' - he seemed to search his memory - 'conceivable?' - he nodded at the choice - 'not conceivable among us. Our communication rests on smell as well as on sound, and to some extent on vision. Pheromones do not lie. Hue and shade do not lie. For that reason we are alone in this chamber. Other Amnion would be distressed by our discussion.'
Distressed to be in the presence of treachery -
(I do have more to say, but my time is running out)
Based on this evidence; I conclude that it must be the second explanation that is offered to us, to be true. Nevertheless, there are still many unanswered questions about the Amnion. I'll leave those to you.