kevinswatch wrote:By the way, Giant Friend, you would be amazed at the kind of "proof" we can find to discover the identity of new memberz. Sorry, I mean members.

-jay
Jay, if you run this site, please I invite you to do three things. One, please, do as your moderators have done and dont judge me hastily,; which brings me to my second invite, do me the decency of reading my and other posts, especially my last long one where I try and spell it out what has been going on. Is it for the cognizenti to judge and try new members? I have not been abusive here, Ive stood my ground. Sure, Ive gotten snotty and sneery, but apparently thats the way the greens lie for some people here. I intend no problems. I bitched about sigs and expalined why, now I have half the site down my throat. Fine. But it doesnt warrant threats of banishment. I mean I dont care, I could always rise up in a new form right? Like how half of you think Im doing right now? Go ahead, I'll remain GF for as long as you need to "prove" Im your past nemesis, which will be never, for I am not he ...or she for all I know. Dear Esmer thinx I came right out and was pissing and moaning, yes I made a post in a couple of spots about the issue, and I like I said, some members decided this was proof was someone who I am not. As I have said I am not here to cause problems...I made some posts, some people posted back in a manner i thought deserved my response and now its a Federal case. Heres my third invite: consider the reactions and behavior of the Established here... have I done worse? Is this a site where someone can express an opinion, as I did about sigs, and not be able to respond in kind? As I have repeatedly said: my vitriol about the subject came from my SECOND posting about it in response to Avatar. If with all of this, especially reading the past posts, you still feel the need to banish me from a site I quite otherwise enjoy, then you must.