you must have some kind of control-freak streak in ya, Lore!Loremaster wrote:I'd rather be Holt.

Moderators: Cord Hurn, Cagliostro
That is exactly what I often said about the books, and I have discussed with Loremaster before... these aren't simple books, there is no true "good" or "evil"... who you think is evil and who you think is good depends wholly on your point of view.Sorus wrote:True... But there are a lot of gray areas. That (for me, anyway) is a large part of what made it such a fascinating series.Warmark Troy wrote:The question really is would ytou rather be a scumbag or a victim. There are few people who have principles who are not being trampled over constantly.
What? i really don't get your logic there... most guys are like Nick deep down? I'm not, and I can think of many others that's aren't as well... and if we've "evolved" past Nick, that your statement is still false... because we're no longer that person deep down.i didnt say i want to be like nick, just that im most like him. i think deep down most blokes are, we just evolve past where nick got to.
Loremaster, do you want to take this one, or should I?Tazzman wrote:Nick is like a spoilt 10 year old that happened to get big and powerful enough to be able to hurt people for real, unlike most 10 year olds.
i, unfortunately see more of myself in nick than anybody else because i was once a spoilt 10 year old. look at nicks past( btw i havnt finished all the books yet, so maybe there are some more revalations) there was nothing major that turned him into a complete A-hole. a girl screwed him once-big deal!! he just never grew up. maybe hes got some sort of personality dissorder but(and i may be wrong) isnt a personality dissorder kind of defined by not growing up emotionally and mentally?
if you say your not like him then i wont argue.
EDIT: what im getting at is nick would have been the guy i would have wanted to be when i was 10. now im 22 i dont but i still see more of myself in him than anyone else. im nothing like any of the other major characters. if i made the assumption that other blokes feel the same and im wrong then i apologise. btw i cant really see how you can question the logic of my post BEFORE youve asked me to explain myself. complain about my logic now
If we are like Nick deep down, by your terms, then we are like Nick... and if, as you have stated, we are like Nick deep down but have evolved past the point where Nick got to, then we are not Nick; for we have surpassed him; therefore one halve of your argument contridicts the other half, one cannot be like Nick and be unlike him at the same time.i think deep down most blokes are, we just evolve past where nick got to.
Thankyou for conceding that you might indeed be wrong; and also for apologising. I will in turn admit that I was wrong for not replying to your post in a respectful manner. I'm sorry.dont but i still see more of myself in him than anyone else. im nothing like any of the other major characters. if i made the assumption that other blokes feel the same and im wrong then i apologise.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!