mmmmmmmmmmm
Thanks, Cail!
Cheers!

Moderator: Menolly
Except when it's crud... I tried the Fordham's Cail was talking about - I forget which I had, but it was the kind of beer that would have been great if they'd used about half as much water. Also tried a selection from a brewery up around Bar Harbor, Maine - dreadful stuff. I I ever move up there, I won't be bragging about that.sgtnull wrote:nothing tastes as good as home!
I'm confused why you think it is unlikely that beer is exposed to light. It sits on shelves in the light. Don't you ever see bottled beer in the store? If you can see it, then there is light hitting it. I'm not sure how long it takes, but a week should do it. Maybe less. Do you think it is unlikely that beer can be exposed to light for a week before you buy it? I'm not making this up. Check out any homebrewer forum. If you can't taste the skunk in Heineken, I don't know what to say. Try again, maybe? Pay more attention, maybe? Compare it side-by-side to the canned version. There is a world of difference, at least to me. But I've made it a habit of noticing these things. For instance, I can taste the difference between Cascade and Chinook hops, or between black malt, chocolate malt, and roasted barely.A question about the "light" factor. When my refrigerator door is closed, its light is off. No sun can get in there, either.
The beer bottles are packaged in cardboard that blocks light, shipped in trucks that block light (I have yet to see a clear case or delivery truck) wink.gif
And sold in indoor distributors.
During that time, how much light can possibly cause that chemical reaction? Is it instantaneous? Why does warm bud in a can taste just as crappy as warm bud in a bottle? Why does warm Heineken in a can taste just as crappy as warm Heineken in a bottle?
"If you can't tell the difference, what difference does it make?"