celebrity couples

Post by **I am not Joan** » Thu May 04, 2006 3:45 am

I am so sick of hearing about most of these people. Why are they in major "news" headlines all of the time?

Post by **Revan** » Thu May 04, 2006 4:16 am

I am not Joan!

Good to see you again!

Post by **matrixman** » Thu May 04, 2006 5:14 am

I voted "Britney Spears with anyone." The definition of spoiled white trash.

I don't much care for the British royals either. The definition of spoiled class trash.

However, I don't mind Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. They're a very sexy couple.

Post by **Revan** » Thu May 04, 2006 5:15 am

Matrixman wrote:I voted "Britney Spears with anyone." The definition of spoiled white trash.

I don't much care for the British royals either. The definition of spoiled class trash.

However, I don't mind Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. They're a very sexy couple.

Personally I don't care - let those people get on with their lives. If you're annoyed with them being in the headlines - don't read the headlines they're in.

They can do what they want - they're people too.

It's the media that's the problem.

Post by **Baradakas** » Thu May 04, 2006 6:17 am

Wish there was an "all of the above" option....

-B

Post by **Revan** » Thu May 04, 2006 6:38 am

Baradakas wrote:Wish there was an "all of the above" option....

-B

heh.

I don't... leave these poor people alone.

Except the royal family - I agree they should be shot.

Post by **matrixman** » Thu May 04, 2006 7:14 am

Of course they're people and can do whatever they want, especially since they've got the money to do whatever they want.

I'm but a mere, lowly member of the working class expressing my discontent with the titled class and the nouveau riche celebrity class.

Post by **drew** » Thu May 04, 2006 8:22 am

I voted the Brad and Angelina..tierd of hearing about how great they.

"Oh look they're in some third world country talking to kids, maybe they'll adopt one"-yeah if must take a real efffort to be want to spend .01% of your millions of dollars on humanitarian work.
-they're just so great--although it's good for their image too!

Post by **dlbpharmd** » Thu May 04, 2006 11:47 am

I'm tired of all of them, but I'm most tired of tomkat.

Post by **Usivius** » Thu May 04, 2006 12:23 pm

ANY of them. Not because I have anything against them, I am just against the whole media attention people's private lives get. Now I know that 'people' read this crap and gives reason for all this invasion, but the paparazzi and other media outlets add serious fule to the fire. I find it really disgusting they way it is reported and portrayed.

Post by **Loredoctor** » Thu May 04, 2006 1:22 pm

Usivius wrote:ANY of them. Not because I have anything against them, I am just against the whole media attention people's private lives get. Now I know that 'people' read this crap and gives reason for all this invasion, but the paparazzi and other media outlets add serious fule to the fire. I find it really disgusting they way it is reported and portrayed.

Here here. I absolutely despise the way the media runs, and how they treated Diana - fucking awful. Poor woman. And it's not just the media - it's also the idiots who buy these magazines.

Post by **danlo** » Thu May 04, 2006 3:19 pm

The new hit couple is **gag** Matt Lienart & Paris Hilton. They're already tiresome..."It's not the first time a Trojan has slipped into a Hilton." and "Who's next in line for him Lindsay Lohan?" well at least two good lines came out of the whole thing...

Post by **onewyteduck** » Thu May 04, 2006 5:21 pm

Loremaster wrote: - it's also the idiots who buy these magazines.

And that is the true problem!

On that note, Tomkat!

Post by **Revan** » Thu May 04, 2006 5:28 pm

Loremaster wrote:
Usivius wrote:ANY of them. Not because I have anything against them, I am just against the whole media attention people's private lives get. Now I know that 'people' read this crap and gives reason for all this invasion, but the paparazzi and other media outlets add serious fule to the fire. I find it really disgusting they way it is reported and portrayed.

Here here. I absolutely despise the way the media runs, and how they treated Diana - ******* awful. Poor woman. And it's not just the media - it's also the idiots who buy these magazines.

Agreed, they treated her horribly. She deserved nothing of what she got.

Post by **___** » Thu May 04, 2006 8:09 pm

I think Jennifer Connely and I make a pretty good couple.

Post by **Marv** » Fri May 05, 2006 12:56 am

i would say they are all tiresome except michael jackson with anyone. thats just creepy. i think what michael jackson has become is really sad but it doesn't change the fact that his relationships with people are just weird.

Post by **Revan** » Fri May 05, 2006 12:59 am

Mr Fixit wrote:I think Jennifer Connely and I make a pretty good couple.

Providing you place a brown paper bag over your head at all times - I believe it could work.

Post by **duchess of malfi** » Fri May 05, 2006 2:54 am

I wish this stuff was only in "those" magazines. Anymore it is hard to escape from it...they even have this crap on CNN Headline News...

Post by **Elfgirl** » Fri May 05, 2006 4:02 am

Baradakas wrote:Wish there was an "all of the above" option....
-B

Word that. It's all about publicity anyway. Why else do their 'marriages' only last a few months at most?

I'm bored with celeb couples news. Just keep printing half-naked pics of Josh Holloway. That's all I ask!

Post by **Damelon** » Fri May 05, 2006 4:29 am

dlbpharmd wrote:I'm tired of all of them, but I'm most tired of tomkat.

I second that!

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

celebrity couples

which celebrity couple is most tiresome?

celebrity couples