If anyone will announce what actions they will be taking, and enough are for the main concerns, I will be willing to change my vote.
I will be putting most, if not all, towards the Abomination.
Who will fight the abomination, and who will focus on the Rift.
Chisi, I assume you will fight the rift.
Anyone else?
Pantheon 2.0 - Game Thread
Moderator: Xar
-
I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
As on most turns, we will devote at least half of our power to greater concerns than our own. It is my purpose to oppose the plague--it is both known and expected that I will do so. We have never seen the need to put all of ourself into a single cause, however--Bhakti has our aid also, and the rift in reality will be opposed by our strength.
This all goes without saying, so why must we delay like this?
This all goes without saying, so why must we delay like this?
I will trust the word of those who state their plans. In a grave issue as this, I believe that no one would lie. They would just not say at all.
Besides, If Chisi and one other person works on the Rift, I will agree to change my vote. With you and Maeror working together, and I and Bhakti working on the Abomination, even If no one else did anything contructive with their DRP, it would still fix our situation.
Besides, If Chisi and one other person works on the Rift, I will agree to change my vote. With you and Maeror working together, and I and Bhakti working on the Abomination, even If no one else did anything contructive with their DRP, it would still fix our situation.
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
-
I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
-
Mithyaat Vam
- Elohim
- Posts: 153
- Joined: Fri Nov 24, 2006 3:39 am
- Location: Sharp. Distance.
-
Chisi La'Roo
- Woodhelvennin
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 9:57 pm
- Location: In a tavern somwhere... gambling, probably drinking a good brew.
Aye on One, as subject to the oath. Adamorn, please don't make this more complicated than it has all ready been. I so do hate complications.
Two is moot because it will be solved with One.
Two is moot because it will be solved with One.
Who says everything has to happen for a reason? Sometimes things just fall into place. Nothing in your future is set in stone, and your story is what you make of it. Make it good, make it interesting, and Lady Luck will smile upon you.
-
Injerian Praetus II
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 640
- Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 12:12 pm
- Location: The Koronus Expanse
I agree to the first part - that we all receive an equal increase in deific power - and agree to the oath.
I do not agree to the second option, now, given that some of you can expend energy on saving the god of fools and nature. As the Orc Goddess and the Goddess of Luck have pointed out, it's a moot part of the deal.
Argothoth, we must meet soon to discuss the cities I will be giving you. Let this be the start of an alliance.
I do not agree to the second option, now, given that some of you can expend energy on saving the god of fools and nature. As the Orc Goddess and the Goddess of Luck have pointed out, it's a moot part of the deal.
Argothoth, we must meet soon to discuss the cities I will be giving you. Let this be the start of an alliance.
"Oh of course," the Navigator said with faint mocking in his voice, "you have probably heard of House Praetus. We have a palace on Holy Terra. Like all powerful groups, we also have our enemies. Do you honestly think someone like you matters?" - A dissolute noble.
Melirelle
My vote is yes for the first option, with the oath if you all are so bent upon mistrusting me and Nor, no for the second option. The latter is a useless option: should it be accepted, and should the abomination be destroyed, how can any of you be sure that your remaining power would be enough to close the rift? Or, vice versa, that after closing the rift you would have enough power to destroy the abomination?
So this is my oath, and it is the same Adomorn swore: In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
However, Bhakti, the title of the Love-Fool indeed suits you. You may not trust Nor's word. You may not trust my word, Goddess of Birth though I may be. But you need only turn to Hedra Iren who, in her wisdom, knows neither I nor Nor Yekith have touched your child with our power. Your mistrust wearies me, especially since I have done nothing to you or your followers since my ascension, and yet you already consider me untrustworthy. What have I done that was so despicable? Destroyed an apathetic god who was content with sitting on his throne while his followers dwindled and his people suffered? Remained aloof while you other gods squabbled? Truly the hypocrisy of the god of Love astounds me. Where is the all-Loving god he claims to be?
My vote is yes for the first option, with the oath if you all are so bent upon mistrusting me and Nor, no for the second option. The latter is a useless option: should it be accepted, and should the abomination be destroyed, how can any of you be sure that your remaining power would be enough to close the rift? Or, vice versa, that after closing the rift you would have enough power to destroy the abomination?
So this is my oath, and it is the same Adomorn swore: In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
However, Bhakti, the title of the Love-Fool indeed suits you. You may not trust Nor's word. You may not trust my word, Goddess of Birth though I may be. But you need only turn to Hedra Iren who, in her wisdom, knows neither I nor Nor Yekith have touched your child with our power. Your mistrust wearies me, especially since I have done nothing to you or your followers since my ascension, and yet you already consider me untrustworthy. What have I done that was so despicable? Destroyed an apathetic god who was content with sitting on his throne while his followers dwindled and his people suffered? Remained aloof while you other gods squabbled? Truly the hypocrisy of the god of Love astounds me. Where is the all-Loving god he claims to be?
one - aye, also subject to the oath
two - aye, preferred
two - aye, preferred
Death is the threshold through which life eternal is reached.
Saving Eiran is the main reason for existing.
Embrace Death as the best means towards this goal.
The most powerful god in Eiran Pantheon 2.0
Divine Rank: 11
Total Worshipers and Prevalent Race: 2.411.443 (undead humans)
Saving Eiran is the main reason for existing.
Embrace Death as the best means towards this goal.
The most powerful god in Eiran Pantheon 2.0
Divine Rank: 11
Total Worshipers and Prevalent Race: 2.411.443 (undead humans)
-
stonemaybe
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4836
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:37 am
- Location: Wallowing in the Zider Zee
Here's my Oath,
In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
And just to reiterate, I will gladly support either of the two options, equal preference.
In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
And just to reiterate, I will gladly support either of the two options, equal preference.
Aglithophile and conniptionist and spectacular moonbow beholder 16Jul11
(:/>
(:/>
I suppose I should swear the Oath.
In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
In the name of the AllFather, I swear that I will not use my power to act against another god or their followers in this turn, nor will I intentionally interfere with the actions of another god, except to aid them against the threats they currently face, and excepting any matter with which a god asks us to provide aid, unless it should violate the first clause of this oath. The independant actions of my followers cannot be taken to represent a violation of this promise.
