Fist and Faith wrote:Skyweir wrote:3. and to my mind .. the pyschological effect of an aggressive force declaring in short .. their claim .. "resistance is futile" .. i believe is a powerful tool .. that attacks the emotional and mental state of its intended victims! combine that with the very real fact that they look like .. scary as all hell .. alien beings ..
I believe the Borg would reply:
"'Psychological effect' is irrelevant. 'Emotional and mental state' is irrelevant. 'Scary' is irrelevant."
your missing the point .. Borg have assimilated 100s of different species and i do not believe they would not possess the intelligence to know how to defeat an enemy .. not just physically .. and the fact that they utter this token declaration .. to me is evidence of that!
Fist wrote:If there really was a Borg out there, I don't think they'd have any communication system whatsoever, other than however their hive-mind works. I don't think they'd see any point in communicating with their intended victims, so why take up room on the ship with the communication equipment?
I guess because as i have already explained it may not be efficient means of communication for the borg collective - borg collective .. it is necessary for borg to other species.
ofcourse the Borg are merely a fictional creation .. so its fairly moot .. however .. being a fictional creation .. they are as their creator (writers) deigned them to be .. and thus they DO possess this approach as so designated
{quote="Fist"]
Skyweir wrote:My point is .. just who do you imagine could write a better 'Omnipotent being'? especially if your criticism is that
clear wrote:How can a 35 year old television writer know what a nearly omnipotent being cares about?
so who does that realistically leave? Are you aware of any omnipotent beings who would like to dabble in a bit of science-fiction script writing?
heh. Good point. But come on! Q always said they were omnipotent, and I never saw evidence otherwise. [/quote] whats your point .. i already said that
Fist wrote:]Although Q (not Q, Q) said something like, "We're not omnipotent, whatever Q has told you." But if they had limits, they were way beyond our comprehension. And what does this being of such power do with himself? He dresses everybody up like Robin Hood and his Merry Men!
Then there's the civil war in the Continuum. They tried to get Janeway to mate with Q, because they figured such a child, the result of the sexual union of a Q, would be a new thing, a next step in Q-volution, or however they worded it. It ended with Q and Lady Q touching fingers, thus conceiving a child. Duh, they already HAD a child who was the result of the sexual union of two Q's! *shakes head* (But all the Q stuff may be worth it for the
great Q line in the TNG episode with that first Q child: "Crusher sounds more shrill every year!"
)
yeah they were pretty silly beings .. and everyone knows they were pretty silly beings .. they injected some humour .. That particular episode was notably gag-worthy .. true .. but i am not attempting to defend the 'Q' as a creation .. moreso the writers ability to write them.
If you want to criticise ideas .. i think some of the original star trek episodes are littered with really dum creatures .. and comparatively ludicrous special effects .. ahead of their time .. but looking back .. uggh
but amazingly forward thinking writers .. who took controversial social and ideological concepts and used them to explore their virtues.
Fist wrote:I think maybe clearfrontier's point is that humans CAN'T write omnipotent beings - and so should stop trying. It always comes out lame, and full of contradictions.
Yeah i get what clear is trying to say .. but i think this is ludicrous. SRD wrote a creator character .. as have numbers of really excellent authors. what they shouldnt?
what would the chronicles be without the creator?
I dont think that creators or omnipotent beings are out of our creative league .. so what if we get it wrong? who's gonna correct us? isnt that the POINT of creative writing?
hasnt clear himself written about an omnipotent being before ever ..
I think ominipotent beings are over-rated
lol .. why should our creative processes be limited by a fictional notion?
arent omnipotent beings a fictional concept? or are there real omnipotent beings that would take exception at being unfairly portrayed?
Creativity .. is a notion that non-omnipotent beings can and inevitably will also dabble in
NB: please note above comments made with appropriate degree of facetiousness