But you know what the game is like!Besides, there's still a lot of gray area to work with. If I send a vision to the unaligned mortals of God X's major city saying that God X is twisted and their followers scum, that's alright. Compelling them to actually do harm would probably cross the line, but just because I can't do that with impunity, doesn't mean I can't make things hard for God X. But I strongly believe that it should not be easy for any god to directly interfere with another god's stuff.
If you send this dream and then the recipients rise up and overthrow God X's temple, slaughtering priests etc (I'm thinking the Night of Blood in Porsulis - which was devastating for Undine but not Maeror's intention), then does the Law take effect, even though you didn't mean for these consequences to happen? It might take 3 DRP for god X to repair the harm you've caused - and you DID intend harm, if not quite so much. So that means you get hit by a 3DRP disaster, or 4.5DRP disaster if God X was weaker than you?
Both God X and you would be screaming at Xar claiming the Law was unfair.
I think.
And if you think the above example too extreme in its consequences, then I would argue that the very fact that the Law is there, is too limiting to Xar in what consequences he can make from our actions.
I would like to hear everyone else's point of view