Hrm, TWL was a lot shorterSeppi2112 wrote:Uh, does nobody remember the whole Sunder/Hollian thing in TWL? Gag me... just as bad, and just as necessary to the storyline (sadly).

Moderators: dlbpharmd, Seareach
I think what Malik is suggesting is that Liand and Pahni have NOTHING to do during the quest - he's not saying that SRD is not developing them, he's rather saying that differently from Sunder and Hollian who had skills and knowledge that made them useful to TC and Linden, Liand and Pahni are pretty much like children in regards to what they know of the Land and what help they can offer, with Haruchai, Giants, Staff of Law, wild magic and what-have-you in the group. In such august company, these two people - both young and innocent in their own way - really cannot compete, and what can they do that others cannot do better? As a result, they are drawn together both because they have nothing else to occupy their minds with AND because they probably recognize being kindred to each other ("hey, you're doing absolutely nothing too! I feel your pain!").kevinswatch wrote:Heh, yeah, I agree. From what I've seen so far, Sunder and Hollian had far more depth to their characters than Liand and Pahni. There's not much of a comparison.Malik wrote:With Liand, it's just the opposite: Linden is leading him through a Land he never knew. So he has no role whatsoever--except to tag along and ogle Pahni.
I mean, that scene with Sunder and Hollian in Andelain in WGW? Powerful stuff. I don't think I'd care a whiff if Liand or Pahni kicked the bucket.
Why even have them around if they add nothing to the story and if SRD can not think of anything else to write about them except for this trite dribble?-jay
You mean the scene that happened halfway through the last book of the previous series?kevinswatch wrote:Heh, yeah, I agree. From what I've seen so far, Sunder and Hollian had far more depth to their characters than Liand and Pahni. There's not much of a comparison.Malik wrote:With Liand, it's just the opposite: Linden is leading him through a Land he never knew. So he has no role whatsoever--except to tag along and ogle Pahni.
I mean, that scene with Sunder and Hollian in Andelain in WGW? Powerful stuff. I don't think I'd care a whiff if Liand or Pahni kicked the bucket.
Wayfriend wrote:The one thing that struck me about Liand and Pahni when I first read it is that Linden's chances dried up.
C'mon -- who didn't think after reading Runes that Liand wanted to get Linden to a waymeet for a weekend if he could?
I definitely get what you're saying Malick, and despite the fact that I thoroughly enjoyed Fatal Revenant, when Linden returned to Revelstone from the past it did cross my mind that we might be a little over-supplied with supporting characters.Malik23 wrote:Variol Son, you make a good argument. On some issues, I may have been too hard on FR, given that we're just halfway through this series. My judging it in terms which require the context of all 4 books will be necessarily premature.
However, at the same time, the books have to succeed as an on-going form of entertainment, and not merely successful in retrospect once it's all over. There are many levels of "completion." One might extend your argument to claim that the original Chronicles can't be judged because the entire three Chronicle epic isn't yet complete. (Sure, my comparison isn't exact. But where it differs, it differs only in degree.)
In this particular case, we're talking about the relationship as something cooked up to fill a void that was already obvious. I'm not comparing Liand now to Sunder at the end of WGW. But even taking your comparison, Sunder was much more developed by the end of TWL than Liand is after two books. From the very start, Sunder's character was rendered in a string of tragic epiphanies. By the time a relationship developed with Hollian, he was already a rich character we cared about. (And Hollian to a lesser extent, but still orders of magnitude greater than Pahni.) Therefore, the fact that there was very little character development for L&P thus far, makes their romance feel like something written to fill the void. Something tacked on just to keep having sentences with their names included on the page. We never needed an excuse to mention Sunder and Hollian.
SRD states the father similarities so many times in TWL and TOT its ridiculous. No preconceptions here, just a careful readingWayfriend wrote:... Except for the part which implies that Linden loved TC as a father-surrogate. That's just imagining your own preconceptions onto someone else.
... followed by a logical leap of metaphoric proportions to conclude that she was incapable of loving a man except as a father replacement. (My wife is an excellent figure skater; if someone walked up to me and told me I had deep psychological issues such that I could only love a figure skater, based on that alone, I would say that they were nuts. You're doing the same thing.)Seppi2112 wrote:SRD states the father similarities so many times in TWL and TOT its ridiculous. No preconceptions here, just a careful reading
Sorry, that's you making the leap. Linden happened to fall for TC because he struck her as a man who found a way to live where her father failed and died. SRD is quite explicit about that. That doesn't in any way mean that she could not love a man who did not possess that particular quality; it just means that this dynamic was driving this particular relationship. Don't assume too much.Wayfriend wrote:... followed by a logical leap of metaphoric proportions to conclude that she was incapable of loving a man except as a father replacement.Seppi2112 wrote:SRD states the father similarities so many times in TWL and TOT its ridiculous. No preconceptions here, just a careful reading