Roger's glamour

Post by **jehannum_2000** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:29 am

Whenever I read about Roger's 'glamour' I get this vision of him in a full-length sequinned dress.

Post by **amanibhavam** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 11:48 am

'glamour' is a word that fits Donaldson. It is a corruption of 'grammar' - and SRD also casts a glamour upon us with his grammar and words

Post by **emotional leper** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:28 pm

Glamour derives from gramarye, a scottish word for enchantment.

Post by **amanibhavam** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 2:04 pm

... which in turn comes from grammar.

www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=gla ... hmode=none

Post by **jehannum_2000** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:05 pm

An interesting word, no doubt, and condign for SRD I agree.

Interesting that it's one of the few words that has not been converted to an "-or" ending in America.

I just wish I could break the association with high camp whenever I read it!

Post by **Ur Dead** » Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:38 pm

jehannum_2000 wrote:Whenever I read about Roger's 'glamour' I get this vision of him in a full-length sequinned dress.

Aide from the above peeps.. I think Roger would look good in a full-length sequinned dress. His personally by Foul seems to fit.

Post by **ninjaboy** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:04 am

I would like to get to know Roger a bit more in the next couple of books.. And then hopefully watch him die hideously.

Post by **emotional leper** » Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:36 am

ninjaboy wrote:I would like to get to know Roger a bit more in the next couple of books.. And then hopefully watch him die hideously.

Terminated with extreme despite?

Kevin's Watch

Kevin's Watch

Roger's glamour

Roger's glamour

Re: Roger's glamour