Infinite Numbers
Moderator: Orlion
Infinite Numbers
Does it have a limit? I've never used anything more than a billion, but since our system doesn't have a top cap are there actual names? Like, "Million" "Billion" ...."Brazillian"?
Where does it go after Billion?
Where does it go after Billion?
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
HAHA. I was wondering what happened to it....Vain wrote:Moved to Gen Disc.
I think the largest named number is a googleplex - which is a google to the power of a google

I do remember something like that from when I was a kid. A million million or something? Or a thousand with a thousand zeros? Something like that.
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25562
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
IIRC, Sagan said you couldn't stuff the amount of paper it would take to write the number googleplex into the known universe. At least at whatever size font he was talking about. But nothing huge. Maybe a half-inch high? A google of 0's is quite a few!
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon

I think I wrote it out on time when I was eight. Took three pieces of paper for me.Fist and Faith wrote:IIRC, Sagan said you couldn't stuff the amount of paper it would take to write the number googleplex into the known universe. At least at whatever size font he was talking about. But nothing huge. Maybe a half-inch high? A google of 0's is quite a few!
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
- The Laughing Man
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9033
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:56 pm
- Location: LMAO
I'll be damned.
I guess we sort of DO have a top cap. At least, when it comes to using it as proof or an actual WORKING number.Skewes' number (gesundheit) is 10^10^10^34 was used as an upper bound in a mathematical proof.
Avatar wrote:But then, the answers provided by your imagination are not only sometimes best, but have the added advantage of being unable to be wrong.
- The Laughing Man
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9033
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:56 pm
- Location: LMAO
- I'm Murrin
- Are you?
- Posts: 15840
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
- Location: North East, UK
- Contact:
Graham's Number
It is too large to be written in scientific notation because even the digits in the exponent would exceed the number of atoms in the observable universe so it needs its own special notation (G) to write down. Graham's number is much larger than other well known large numbers such as a googol and a googolplex, and even larger than Skewes' number and Moser's number, other well-known large numbers.
- High Lord Tolkien
- Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
- Posts: 7393
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
- Location: Cape Cod, Mass
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Contact:
Googleplex?
Please!
That's paltry.
You want the biggest number?
Zillion.
Case closed.
Hey all this talk about Cosmos has reminded me.
The History Channel is playing "The Universe" almost every night.
It's really good.
(I do long to hear Sagan say the word "billions" again though.)
Please!
That's paltry.
You want the biggest number?
Zillion.
Case closed.

Hey all this talk about Cosmos has reminded me.
The History Channel is playing "The Universe" almost every night.
It's really good.
(I do long to hear Sagan say the word "billions" again though.)
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/
[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!




- The Laughing Man
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9033
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:56 pm
- Location: LMAO
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 25562
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 57 times
- The Laughing Man
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9033
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:56 pm
- Location: LMAO
leave it to a mathmetician to create a number that doesn't exist.Murrin wrote:Graham's Number
It is too large to be written in scientific notation because even the digits in the exponent would exceed the number of atoms in the observable universe so it needs its own special notation (G) to write down. Graham's number is much larger than other well known large numbers such as a googol and a googolplex, and even larger than Skewes' number and Moser's number, other well-known large numbers.

- Cagliostro
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 9360
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 pm
- Location: Colorado