The Oath of peace, instrument of the Despiser?

A place to discuss the books in the FC and SC. *Please Note* No LC spoilers allowed in this forum. Do so in the forum below.

Moderators: Orlion, kevinswatch

Post Reply
User avatar
Mr. Broken
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 5:49 pm
Location: The arm pit of hell, Titusville Pa.

The Oath of peace, instrument of the Despiser?

Post by Mr. Broken »

Was the concept of the Oath conceived through the fear of desecration, or from Fouls subtle influences. Isnt it possible that Foul himself feared another Ritual of Desecration because of the weakened state that Kevins left him in . Consider that the ritual itself did not have the power required to threaten the Arch of time, and any reduction in Fouls power leaves him trapped that much longer.
User avatar
Relayer
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1365
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 4:36 am
Location: Wasatch Stonedown

Post by Relayer »

Interesting question. Or it could be that Foul knew that in some way, the Oath would hamper the Lord's abilities to wield power against him.

BUT, I personally don't believe either of those. I think the Oath was an honest response of the people of the Land to what had happened with Kevin. They just didn't see that they were also handicapping themselves by restricting their passion.
"History is a myth men have agreed upon." - Napoleon

Image
User avatar
dlbpharmd
Lord
Posts: 14462
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:27 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dlbpharmd »

Relayer wrote: BUT, I personally don't believe either of those. I think the Oath was an honest response of the people of the Land to what had happened with Kevin. They just didn't see that they were also handicapping themselves by restricting their passion.
Well said.
Image
User avatar
Mortice Root
Bloodguard
Posts: 980
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 2:05 am
Location: Wisconsin

Post by Mortice Root »

Hi, Something Broken. Welcome to the watch! :D

I agree with Relayer and dlb, though. It's an interesting idea, but my thought was that the Oath was an understandable response to the desecration on the part of the new lords.

Additionally, my impression was that, at the time the new lords would have been formulating the Oath, that Foul was still too "reduced" to have attained that level of influence again.
"The plural of antecdotes is not evidence."
-------------
Driving down the razor's edge between the past and the future
Turn up the music and smile
Get carried away on the songs and stories of vanished times
Post Reply

Return to “The First and Second Chronicles of Thomas Covenant”