[spoiler]I must be missing the post, but where does everyone stand on the recent announcement to split DH into two films? I say, why not? I'm watching them both anyway, the studios will make their money, and we can hope that they will do the book justice - justice they demonstrated they couldn't do with OOTP. (No blame or fault, just truth.)
The question du jour, and du 2008-2010, is where to split them. I have my ideas, like everyone else. Yours?
I think it's silly to spoil this, but I'm going to, because I fear the wrath of the administrators. Well, I'm going to try anyway...wrath isn't so bad. I hope I do it right - and it's a good test run.[/spoiler][/spoiler]
Movies 7+
Moderator: Menolly
-
Counselor
- Servant of the Land
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2006 7:43 am
- Location: San Joaquin Valley, California
The lesson
...as always, is that I am an idiot. *
*Bill Simmons, on espn.com, uses this line, or something like it, frequently. I tend to apply it to my own life, just as frequently.
*Bill Simmons, on espn.com, uses this line, or something like it, frequently. I tend to apply it to my own life, just as frequently.
"Superfluity does not vitiate." - California Code of Civil Procedure §3537
My theory? The return of a certain someone following the appearance of a certain animal and the destruction of a certain object.
"O let my name be in the Book of Love!
It be there, I care not of the other great book Above.
Strike it out! Or, write it in anew. But
Let my name be in the Book of Love!" --Omar Khayam
It be there, I care not of the other great book Above.
Strike it out! Or, write it in anew. But
Let my name be in the Book of Love!" --Omar Khayam
