(in bold) - Dang, there you go with a spoiler comment. j/kSGuilfoyle1966 wrote:You have to assume that he was a god of some kind, and just appeared as a beggar to Covenant and Linden.
if you take his word in The Power That Preserves that Covenant was neath death from the antivenin, how then did Covenant survive.
And you don't have to take the beggar's word. the nurse and Doctors seem very surprised that he is suddenly hale and hearty.
My thing with the guy in the ochre (by that I always took to mean brown) robe, is that if he had appeared in majestic splendor, with perhaps a glowing, golden crown, Covenant would have known for sure he had gone nuts.
He also fits the archetypal image of a voice in the wilderness.
But the thing that always gets me is that the beggar appears to Covenant in the beginning and in the end of First Chronicles.
The beggar appears to Linden in the beginning of second Chronicles, but not at the end. However, Covenant appears to her at the end of second chronicles, in that same kind of "farewell" mode.Spoiler
And nobody appears to Linden in the beginning of Final Chronicles.
(the moderator didn't think it was a joke-so I covered it up-d)
I have both of the new books for the Last Chronicles, (one of them is the British release, in fact) but haven't had time to read either of them - maybe I should just stay away from this Website until I do <GRin>
I've finished the first Chonicles and getting onto The Wounded Land, first few chapters already. It's all coming back in a flood, from the first time I read them.
As for the "man-in-the-ochre-robe" ... We all have to know it really is the being who calls himself the Creator of the World that Covemant ends up in when he falls thru the earth (as it were) - and back on Main Street in the Town where he has chosen to live out his days as a Leper - the man in the robe does have "some" leverage - but it has to be in-direct, remember? The same goes for Lord Foul, as well ... remember the fire and the devil (satanic) ritual he witnessed? That was Foul being indirect as well, correct? Tit-for-tat? when you go back and read the final chapter in the 3rd book (1st Chronicles) he gets very detailed in what he cannot do, over & over, in fact.
Call it an Avatar if you like - but, it's really him affecting the outcome by giving Covenant the choice(s) .... and letting the chips fall where they may. Lord Foul indirectly uses satanic fear and one could say he has more leverage to affect the outcomes... but, he is also the one who is trapped in the Land of Lord Mohram.
The Creator - for lack of a better word - is who has his hands tied the most. Faith? I'd say so. Yet, he never sways from making sure Covenant has "choices" ... still with the indirect cause & affect protocol being used .... ever faithful to his Rules in that Universe. Covenant could have chosen something else at the end of the First Chronicles.
Just an opinion...........