Spoiler
mod edit - generally we warn people about spoilers and tag the, within the post.
Ummm, isn't the name of the thread and the spoiler tags enough?
Moderators: sgt.null, dANdeLION
How can you even say it's far better if you've never read the graphic novel? For me, nothing beats the impact of the graphic novel's ending, because the villain wins and you see it as bodies littering an entire city, blood everywhere, but in the movie what do we get? A CGI effect less impressive than Deep Impact or Armageddon. Seriously. The psychic effect was utter shit.jacob Raver, sinTempter wrote:Urm. I've seen many posts on imdb that didn't like thebut I personally think it is far, far better and give Snyder and his writing crew a massive high five for changing it, risky business changing such loved works...Spoiler
new ending in the filmSpoiler
It really flips you on your head and makes sense as a buffer against Manhatten's seemingly limitless power while creating an interesting relational connection between Manhatten and Ozy, and pulling apart the connection between Manhatten and Rorsharch, though the film really didn't show any relationship at all between the two.
Murrin wrote:I'd agree with that, Foul. Not seen the film version yet, but the graphic novel just hadThat was a brilliant way of revealing it and should not have been altered, IMO.Spoiler
Ozymandias' line about his plan already having happened, then a cut to the bodies everywhere (which implicitly included the people on the street who had been established and given character throughout the body of the novel - the kid, the news-stand owner, the psychologist, and so on).
Manhattan leaves humanity and becomes a God. So I don't get your first point. Why does a blue psychic wave help us "care deeper" than a giant squid? Neither are supposed to make us care. It's the effect, dramatic effect of cutting to bodies everywhere compared to a CGI blue wave. If you read the comic, the illustrations of the carnage of the city, it's breathtaking and one of the real twists and kickers in the entire graphic novel. Just a static cut to bodies. Everywhere. He did it. "I did it!" - Adrian Veidt. Now that's something to high-five about, especially in 80s comics when the villain never wins (and hardly ever does in the 90s, 00s, or hell--in any dramatic work the villain hardly ever wins at that scope). And to me, there's more dramatic thump when you see, silently, the toll before your eyes than a blue psychic wave.jacob Raver, sinTempter wrote:It's far better because it stays with the characters...
...it illuminates Dr. Manhatten's journey away from, and later back to, humanity in an amazing light...
...it stays with a character and helps us care deeper, wheras a giant squid thing created on an island doesn't...
I gotta completely disagree there. The message of both the movie--that some outside factor is faked by Veidt to make humanity bind together--is exactly the same in both mediums; it's only how it's delivered; one is Manhattan (the movie), the other the engineered squid. And neither were that mysterious or imperceptible to me.The Dreaming wrote:The Comics ending requires a LOT of setup and explanation to make any sense at all, and in the end, it doesn't really make that much.
I think a complete wuss out. The bodies-everywhere presentation impacted me much more, but since Snyder actually listened to test audiences (the ineffectiveness of which I've commented on earlier), he removed that impact and replaced it with a CGI wall of blue that picks people up. Didn't impact me at all. Felt like I was watching a disaster effect done better by Armageddon or Deep Impact.The Dreaming wrote:And how can you accuse Snyder of wussing out on the ending?
Superior to? I always found that we were the ones observing Rorschach's death, the reader, and I did not need Nite Owl to be outside watching on. The book wasn't about big revelations or "No, Gandalf!" from the characters but our own shock as these scenes unfold behind the scenes of a crumbling world.Zahir wrote:Spoiler
The emotional impact of Nite Owl's reaction to Rorschach's death seemed superior to me, not least because Dan seemed to me the most thoroughly heroic and "good" character.
The medium is certainly changed, but when that medium is changed from an outside force (the squid) to one of the film's main characters (Dr. Manhattan), it becomes a shift which is more than superficial.The message of both the movie--that some outside factor is faked by Veidt to make humanity bind together--is exactly the same in both mediums; it's only how it's delivered; one is Manhattan (the movie), the other the engineered squid. And neither were that mysterious or imperceptible to me.