Conjoined Twins

Technology, computers, sciences, mysteries and phenomena of all kinds, etc., etc. all here at The Loresraat!!

Moderator: Vraith

Post Reply
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19846
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Conjoined Twins

Post by Zarathustra »

I didn't know which forum to post this, the Close or here. I saw these two girls on TLC the other night, and I can't stop thinking about them.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkKWApOAG2g

This is so strange, it really stretches what it means to be human. They are more than just two people joined. They are two people in the same body. They have separate brains, spines, hearts, and lungs, but share a diaphragm, a large intestine, and reproductive organs. Each controls an arm an a leg (which the other can't feel), but they have managed to coordinate their movements so they can walk, run, drive, swim, play sports, ect. Each can write separately, think separately, talk separately, but they still seem to have a mental connection because they can finish each other's sentences with an eerie precision. They scratch either side of their body (which they purported don't feel). There is some subconscious overlap, it seems. They share sensation at the middle line of their body.

But even stranger is how to think of them as separate or one person with two heads. It might seem obvious at first that we should treat them as two people because they have two distinct personalities. But what about legally? Do we give them one speeding ticket, or two? Hire them for a job as one person, or two? Let them take colleges courses as a single person, or as two? Since it's impossible for them to say, take a test, without seeing each other's work, is it really fair to allow them to have two separate grades and college credit when they collaborate on every single aspect of their work in a way that goes *way* beyond "cheating?" Can they really perform the work of two people, such that they deserve two paychecks? Can they get married without it being polygamy? If they are legally two people, then how can one get married and "force" the other into this marriage? But if they both agree (as it seems they must) isn't this legally marrying two women? Since they share one set of reproductive organs, who would be the mother? Both? How can anyone have *two* biological mothers? What if one wants to have sex but the other doesn't? Are you raping one even though the other gives consent?

Clearly, these girls blur the line between individuals and "dual" being in a way that I can't wrap my head around. What if one girl kills someone? You can't put them both in jail, can you? Or are they both responsible for each other's behavior?
Success will be my revenge -- DJT
lorin
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 3492
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:28 am
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by lorin »

Discovery did a one hour documentary on them last year. They are pretty amazing. I am fascinated at their ability to cooperate. Each one "commands" one hand and one foot. Every action they take is a cooperative effort. Walking, running, and now they are taking drivers ed. My teenager can't seem to coordinate her brain and arms when it comes to driving. Can you imagine coordinating two separate arms with two separate minds?

Their whole existence is based on cooperation and respect for each other. They also have a great talent and ability to compartmentalize, to see each action and task as seperate and distinct.

Here is another pair of conjoined twins, the Shappell twins, that have survived and prospered. Their situation is even more challenging in that they share 30% of their brain matter.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lori_and_Reba_Schappell
Last edited by lorin on Wed Mar 04, 2009 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
The loudest truth I ever heard was the softest sound.
User avatar
rdhopeca
The Master
Posts: 2798
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Post by rdhopeca »

Frankly I am at a loss for words. I can't even begin to imagine, I mean, what happens if they fall in love with different people? I'm assuming they are going to someday, aren't they? What if one has insomnia and wants to read while the other is trying to sleep?

What would happen if only one of them had a heart attack?

Incomprehensible...
Rob

"Progress is made. Be warned."
User avatar
Vraith
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 10623
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 8:03 pm
Location: everywhere, all the time
Been thanked: 3 times

Post by Vraith »

I think I saw that show about them too, (if not them, another very similar "pair"
All the questions above just leave me...I don't think there's even a word for it..incomprehensible times 10 to the n-th, where n is the biggest number you can think of.
Even the heart attack question, which is the easiest isn't (does the other heart have enough oomph? Does it have arteries that connect? Can the dead side be put on permanent life support? (Or...god...amputated, leaving a one armed, one legged survivor)
Boggled, completely boggled.
[spoiler]Sig-man, Libtard, Stupid piece of shit. change your text color to brown. Mr. Reliable, bullshit-slinging liarFucker-user.[/spoiler]
the difference between evidence and sources: whether they come from the horse's mouth or a horse's ass.
"Most people are other people. Their thoughts are someone else's opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation."
the hyperbole is a beauty...for we are then allowed to say a little more than the truth...and language is more efficient when it goes beyond reality than when it stops short of it.
User avatar
dlbpharmd
Lord
Posts: 14462
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:27 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dlbpharmd »

Amazing. I've never seen them before. Remarkable young ladies.
Image
User avatar
Dromond
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2451
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 3:17 am
Location: The Sunbirth Sea

Post by Dromond »

Astounding!
I've seen conjoined twins before, but never quite like this, where all the questions brought up on this thread are so ponderous.

I'm leaning towards one body, one person... I can't validate it in words, I can have my mind changed on this one, but it seems to me that there's one body and an extra head (mind) that is the issue legally.
(I hope that never happens, it seems unsolvable.)

(I just deleted a sentence here because as soon as I typed it the other side seems as valid as the other.)

Wow.
I'm just thrilled that those girls seem to be enjoying life. Strong parents can't be overstated here.

Some would say God chose them ( I don't hold to that) but I couldn't imagine myself able to cope with a like situation. Maybe the reality of it makes it possible.
Whew! I feel great admiration for those girls, and much respect. Along with the family.
Image
User avatar
Xar
Lord
Posts: 3330
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2004 8:41 pm
Location: Watching over the Pantheon...

Post by Xar »

Cases such as this - in particular, of conjoined twins which cannot be separated with today's surgical techniques - really force us to think of how we define "person" from a moral and a legal standpoint - which might not be the same. About a century ago, if I remember correctly, another set of conjoined twins (Violet and Daisy Hilton, if I'm not mistaken) faced a situation similar to one which has been described in this thread: one of the twins fell in love with a man and wanted to marry him. History does not record her sister's comments on this, although it seems to have been acquiescence (and they were joined in a far less... intimate way than Abigail and Brittany Hensel, for that matter), and the groom-to-be apparently was willing to accept the extraordinary circumstances, but the State denied the marriage request, stating that by virtue of the fact that the twins would live together all their life, any marriage either of them entered would in effect lead to polygamy, since the groom would live with two women (nevermind the fact that they had two distinct legal identities and he would only legally marry one).

There is a fascinating book on the topic of conjoined twins, which also talks about their psychology and the amazing fact that no matter what the form of conjoinment, of all the conjoined twins who reached adulthood without being separated, only one couple (the two Iranian sisters whose case was presented by the media years ago) ever chose to be separated: all other recorded instances of twins who grew to adulthood without being separated not only actively denied wanting to become singletons (even when the possibility had become feasible due to medical advances), but when one of the twins eventually died, the other consciously would choose to die with his or her sibling, rather than being separated before death (which was again a possibility for at least some such couples).

The book in question even argues at length on the morality of "sacrifice separation" and whether conjoined twins should be separated at all (i.e. if it is better for healthy conjoined twins to grow to adulthood as conjoined, but otherwise healthy people, or as separate but likely disabled people). It's a divulgative text, so even if you don't have a background in medicine or biology, it's still very understandable. For any who are interested, the book is called "One of us", by Alice Domurat Dreger.
Post Reply

Return to “The Loresraat”