Merlin
Moderators: Cagliostro, sgt.null
- [Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Merlin
Who the hell greenlighted this show for a second episode, much less a second season?
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
Which? Is this a brand new one, or the one broadcast here last year?
If the latter, I can understand your dissatisfaction. I watched about four episodes, and it was pretty grotesque. It sounded alright on paper, but it was done so very badly.
If the latter, I can understand your dissatisfaction. I watched about four episodes, and it was pretty grotesque. It sounded alright on paper, but it was done so very badly.
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
- [Syl]
- Unfettered One
- Posts: 13020
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 1 time
Yeah, the BBC one. The first two episodes are on Hulu if anyone wants to subject themselves to it.
As for me, I had to turn it off about halfway through the second episode. The incredibly fake-looking, Anaconda wannabe had just hissed its way into the room, and I couldn't take it anymore. It's like someone at the BBC said, "You know, Robin Hood would be great if it wasn't so serious and literary sometimes."
As for me, I had to turn it off about halfway through the second episode. The incredibly fake-looking, Anaconda wannabe had just hissed its way into the room, and I couldn't take it anymore. It's like someone at the BBC said, "You know, Robin Hood would be great if it wasn't so serious and literary sometimes."
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
-George Steiner
- dANdeLION
- Lord
- Posts: 23836
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:22 am
- Location: In the jungle, the mighty jungle
- Contact:
The commercials were enough to make me avoid it........
Dandelion don't tell no lies
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
- Worm of Despite
- Lord
- Posts: 9546
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 7:46 pm
- Location: Rome, GA
- Contact:
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
- dANdeLION
- Lord
- Posts: 23836
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 3:22 am
- Location: In the jungle, the mighty jungle
- Contact:
No, I think this one's worse.Lord Foul wrote:Is this that piece of crap with Sam Neill and Martin Short?
Dandelion don't tell no lies
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
Dandelion will make you wise
Tell me if she laughs or cries
Blow away dandelion
I'm afraid there's no denying
I'm just a dandelion
a fate I don't deserve.
High priest of THOOOTP
*
* This post carries Jay's seal of approval
Was mainly for the kids I think.
It kept me watching all season tbh.
The Beeb are desparately trying to recreate the success of the Doctor Who revamp I think... Okay so they are mainly failing (I heard Robin Hood was Crap too) but hey, at least they are trying now.
Sci-Fi and fantasy have been no-go zones for the last decade or two for them.
May the hit gold soon!
It kept me watching all season tbh.
The Beeb are desparately trying to recreate the success of the Doctor Who revamp I think... Okay so they are mainly failing (I heard Robin Hood was Crap too) but hey, at least they are trying now.
Sci-Fi and fantasy have been no-go zones for the last decade or two for them.
May the hit gold soon!
"There's only one way to hurt a man who's lost everything. Give him back something broken." - Thomas Covenant
- Earthfriend
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:32 pm
- Location: The Hills of Andelain
I agree, Vasko. My seven year old daughter loves it, much to my chagrin.
For me, T H White's The Once And Future King was always the canon for the Arthurian myth. Aside from using some of the same names, this TV show seems to have little if nothing to do with White's novel. I mean, a dragon? Chained up under a castle?? Really???
Still, if they'd actually tried to create something new, instead of hijacking an existing franchise for better audience recognition, I probably wouldn't have found it quite so repellent.
For me, T H White's The Once And Future King was always the canon for the Arthurian myth. Aside from using some of the same names, this TV show seems to have little if nothing to do with White's novel. I mean, a dragon? Chained up under a castle?? Really???
Still, if they'd actually tried to create something new, instead of hijacking an existing franchise for better audience recognition, I probably wouldn't have found it quite so repellent.
Stone and Sea are deep in life,
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
Agreed. It's really just original (I use the word loosely) quasi-fantasy for kiddies, with famous names slapped on the characters. Without that claim to be something it isn't, I wouldn't have been as disgusted - though I also wouldn't have tried watching it.Earthfriend wrote:Still, if they'd actually tried to create something new, instead of hijacking an existing franchise for better audience recognition, I probably wouldn't have found it quite so repellent.
- finn
- The Gap Into Spam
- Posts: 4349
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 5:03 am
- Location: Maintaining an unsociable distance....
I agree Earthfirend I loved THW's book: I think the BBC only got as far as page three and decided to make the whole thing in the whimsical tone of the beginning of the book without taking it further.
I fear for Robin Hood too with yet another remake in the wings this time with Ridley Scott/Russell Crowe. I have yet to really enjoy anything other than Erroll Flynn's classic, though the TV movie with Patrick Bergin and Uma Thurman was not bad (IMO) and Edward Fox played King John superbly.
The two books (or series of books) that best portray the "legends" for me are the Jack Whyte series starting with The Skystone for Arthur and a brilliant book by Parke Godwin called Sherwood which really makes the Robin Hood story stand tall with a realistic historical setting and motives.
I fear for Robin Hood too with yet another remake in the wings this time with Ridley Scott/Russell Crowe. I have yet to really enjoy anything other than Erroll Flynn's classic, though the TV movie with Patrick Bergin and Uma Thurman was not bad (IMO) and Edward Fox played King John superbly.
The two books (or series of books) that best portray the "legends" for me are the Jack Whyte series starting with The Skystone for Arthur and a brilliant book by Parke Godwin called Sherwood which really makes the Robin Hood story stand tall with a realistic historical setting and motives.
"Winston, if you were my husband I'd give you poison" ................ "Madam, if you were my wife I would drink it!"
"Terrorism is war by the poor, and war is terrorism by the rich"
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well."
"The opposite of pro-life isn't pro-death. Y'know?"
"What if the Hokey Cokey really is what its all about?"
"Terrorism is war by the poor, and war is terrorism by the rich"
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well."
"The opposite of pro-life isn't pro-death. Y'know?"
"What if the Hokey Cokey really is what its all about?"
- CovenantJr
- Lord
- Posts: 12608
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2002 9:10 pm
- Location: North Wales
Did anyone see the godawful Robin Hood about ten years ago, in the Xena/Hercules mould? Ropey stuff.
As for decent screen renditions of Arthur/Robin, the best Robin Hood I've seen remains the 80s series, Robin of Sherwood. Not only is it darker and more mythic than other Robin Hoods, it also refers to places I actually know around Notiinghamshire, demonstrating an attention to detail that's sadly lacking in other versions.
Sadly, I've yet to see a screen incarnation of Arthur that particularly impresses me (unless you count the ludicrous early 90s cartoon series, King Arthur and the Knights of Justice ).
As for decent screen renditions of Arthur/Robin, the best Robin Hood I've seen remains the 80s series, Robin of Sherwood. Not only is it darker and more mythic than other Robin Hoods, it also refers to places I actually know around Notiinghamshire, demonstrating an attention to detail that's sadly lacking in other versions.
Sadly, I've yet to see a screen incarnation of Arthur that particularly impresses me (unless you count the ludicrous early 90s cartoon series, King Arthur and the Knights of Justice ).
You may remember I started reading Lawhead's Robin Hood interpretation, Hood; I'm sad to say I dropped it maybe halfway through because it was...well...dull. It didn't seem to grow as naturally as the Pendragon Cycle; it seemed a little forced. The magic (of the writing, not actual sorcery) wasn't present. Plus, unlike Myrddin, Arthur, Bedwyr, Gwalchavad, or any of the other Pendragon POV characters, Robin was basically a womanising lout, full of bluster and ignorance. Not an agreeable character, and hard to feel any interest in.Menolly wrote:I like Stephen Lawhead's Pendragon Cycle the best myself. But yeah, it sounds like I would not have cared for this series at all...
- Menolly
- A Lowly Harper
- Posts: 24082
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
- Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Thanks for that, Cj. I've been wondering what your impression of the series was before picking it up.CovenantJr wrote:You may remember I started reading Lawhead's Robin Hood interpretation, Hood; I'm sad to say I dropped it maybe halfway through because it was...well...dull. It didn't seem to grow as naturally as the Pendragon Cycle; it seemed a little forced. The magic (of the writing, not actual sorcery) wasn't present. Plus, unlike Myrddin, Arthur, Bedwyr, Gwalchavad, or any of the other Pendragon POV characters, Robin was basically a womanising lout, full of bluster and ignorance. Not an agreeable character, and hard to feel any interest in.Menolly wrote:I like Stephen Lawhead's Pendragon Cycle the best myself. But yeah, it sounds like I would not have cared for this series at all...
SecondedCovenantJr wrote:As for decent screen renditions of Arthur/Robin, the best Robin Hood I've seen remains the 80s series, Robin of Sherwood. Not only is it darker and more mythic than other Robin Hoods, it also refers to places I actually know around Notiinghamshire, demonstrating an attention to detail that's sadly lacking in other versions.
Clannad's soundtrack was great too.
"There's only one way to hurt a man who's lost everything. Give him back something broken." - Thomas Covenant
- Earthfriend
- <i>Haruchai</i>
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:32 pm
- Location: The Hills of Andelain
I really enjoyed the movie 'Excaliber', though I haven't seen it in years. It would be my favourite movie adaptation of the Arthurian myth.
As for Robin Hood, I do have a fondness for the Sean Connery movie, misplaced though that fondness may be. And Alan Rickman as the Sherriff of Nottingham - pure gold. Between him and Morgan Freeman, they stole the movie from K. Costner, for me.
As for Robin Hood, I do have a fondness for the Sean Connery movie, misplaced though that fondness may be. And Alan Rickman as the Sherriff of Nottingham - pure gold. Between him and Morgan Freeman, they stole the movie from K. Costner, for me.
Stone and Sea are deep in life,
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
two unalterable symbols of the world;
permanence at rest, and permanence in motion;
participants in the Power that remains.
- Fist and Faith
- Magister Vitae
- Posts: 23652
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 33 times
Best Robin Hood show was When Things Were Rotten. For movies, even though I usually enjoy them all to some degree, I grew up watching Erroll Flynn every year when it would come on tv, and will always put that on top of the heap.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest -Paul Simon