Oh my god, I forgot about Zardoz, what a piece of crap. The first 5 minutes is worth watching for how god-awful ridiculous it is. The goofy thing is, Boorman is a *good* director. What the hell happened? It has to be the single worst movie by a good director ever made. (1941 and Jack ain't got nothin on it.)matrixman wrote:Speaking of drugs and/or inebriation, I still wonder what substances John Boorman was under the influence of when he made Zardoz, one of the most inane films I've ever seen. People love to slam Kubrick for being pretentious, but Boorman is the guy who gives pretention a bad name. How did Zardoz ever get green-lit? (Oh I know, because Boorman had made Deliverance earlier, a genuinely good film.)
Edit: Just IMDBd Boorman, I couldn't for the life of me think of something he had made since Excalibur... Hes doing a new Wizard of Oz movie...
I would say that the Wizard of Oz might be the movie most desperately in need of a remake. (Non-musical, more closely follows the book.) My fantasy was for Burton to do it, and he's been doing projects that come tantalizingly close. (New Charlie and the Chocolate factory, Alice in Wonderland...) Boorman though? I'm kind of scared. I might feel safer with Lynch doing it! (For the record, I adore all of Baum's Oz novels, I have loved them since childhood)