My next major question to SRD relates back to this question that I submitted to the GI, soon after Elohimfest 2007 in Albuquerque:
Don: Your comment the other night about "needing the ring more than Tolkien" has really had me thinking about Covenant and Joan and their relationship. Just as the state of the Land was mirrored in Covenant in First Chronicles, Joan's physical state reflected the plight of the Land in 2nd and now Last Chronicles. Is Joan connected to the Land simply because she and Covenant were married, or is there some deeper reason?
Well of *course* there's "some deeper reason". <grin> But I hope you don't expect me to tell you what it is. I mean, aside from obvious things like: she has a white gold ring (the "mate" to Covenant's); and her "betrayal" of her marriage vows has left her vulnerable to the insidious seductions of Despite. However, I will say that if you're willing to stretch a point or three, you could conceivably think of her as Covenant's thematic doppleganger. (How come there's never an umlaut around when you need one?)
(07/02/2007)
I talked about the Christian concept of marriage - that two people become united in marriage and become "one." I said that, to me, Covenant and Joan are so entwined in the Land, that it must be that their rings are the ONLY 2 white gold rings that could wield wild magic. He said that, going back to the origin of white gold, it isn't found in the Land at all. If it were possible to make white gold, then there could be thousands of white gold rings wielding wild magic. But since Covenant and Joan's rings are the only 2 that have made it to the Land, these rings are the only manifestations of wild magic.
My follow up: "Who is the rightful wielder of Covenant's ring?" Answer was, essentially, that neither Covenant nor Linden are rightful wielders of the rings they bear. Immediately, I asked "Is Lord Foul the rightful wielder of Covenant's ring?" He said "You could make a strong argument that Lord Foul is the rightful wielder. But it wouldn't do him any good, because he can't destroy the Arch that way." As Orlion said above, Foul can't attack the AoT with wild magic without putting Covenant back into the Arch, and if that happens, Foul can't win (essentially we'd be back to the ending of WGW, and SRD said he didn't want to tell that story again.) I'm really fuzzy on this answer, and if I see SRD again today, I'm going to ask him to clarify.
More later!