earthbrah wrote:Regarding my previous post, I have realized something (possibly):
The Ramen have long called the Despiser Fangthane the Render. Do they do this because their people have a long-lived memory of the rending of Kelebhrabanal by Foul? Mahrtiir's story makes pretty clear that they don't actually know how Kelenbhrabanal was killed, but rather deduce it from the Ranyhyn's particular fear of the lurker.
And IF the father of horses was rent, what of the remnants of his spirit? If we're to accept what is suggested, then the lurker may have been Foul's tool to rend Kelenbhrabanal's spirit. Perhaps the Ranyhyn are afraid of the lurker because it represents their unconfronted grief with the loss of their ancient father...
Anyway, perhaps there is more to this idea of Kelenbhrabanal's rending...and did you notice that the Ranyhyn that bears Jeremiah is named Khelen (which is damn close to Kelen)? That's too close to be a coincidence...
I don't subscribe to this theory.
The Ramen call the Grey Slayer the Render, yes. They call the demondim the Teeth of the Render.
And it is entirely possible that Horrim Carabal was the 'tool' used by Fangthane to bring about Kelenbhrabanal's death.
Does the term 'rent' always imply the continuation of the victim's spirit or mind within the 'render'? I'm not convinced. Kelenbhrabanal was a great horse, an embodiment of earthpower. The rent raver, however, was a being of a completely different nature. Perhaps the nature of the ravers it what is able to influence their 'renders' after they have been rent.
Furthermore, had the spirit of this great horse been kept alive in the Lurker, the way the Raver is in the Sandgorgons, I believe it would inspire a different reaction in the Ranyhyn than terror.
Also, what you say about the Ranyhyn and their unconfronted grief is wrong. They all share and express their grief during their horserites.
Forgive my death.
It was my flesh that failed you, not my love.