I agree...for what you said reason, and because [as you might not have seen, posted being new but I and others have pointed at] she is also spoken of before madness as that which made pure and holy love possible. [roughly]. What matters is how/in what situation her name is restored to her.Samnite wrote:Aaaaahhhh! Damn it, I screwed up my very first post. Thanks for the correction. Esmer. Yes.
I still think one of the keys to the whole thing is going to be Naming the Bane. She could ALMOST be reasoned with for a second there, so it's obvious that her nature is not 100% blind destructiveness, and it seems terribly evil to just keep this multitudinous scorned woman all chained up in the kitchen, so to speak.
Or so the seeming/hope of some of us goes.