The Hobbit

The KWMdB.

Moderators: sgt.null, dANdeLION

User avatar
Cagliostro
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9360
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by Cagliostro »

I saw it yesterday twice. The first time with 48 FPS 3-D and on an IMAX screen, and the second time with 24 FPS normal size screen and 3-D.

I was so distracted at the beginning of the movie with the new frame rate that I missed a heap and the dialogue was lost occasionally because I think the sound in the first theater wasn't as good as in the second.

I can't tell if it was the fault of the frame rate or the IMAX screen, but I had trouble seeing everything with the first viewing. But I feel that overall, it was the superior experience. The "old 70's soap opera" feel to the increased frame rate was a little hard to get used to at first, but was interesting for a fantasy feel to feel more "real," and I really felt like I was a lot more in the action that usual. The scenes were it all really popped was when they were outside. I remember some of the first few forest scenes made me feel like I was really there, and the rocks and so forth looked so clear, I really felt I was in New Zealand. The second time I saw it looked much flatter in comparison. And speaking of flatter, the 3D effect was much more effective with the new frame rate as well.

When the movie started with the normal frame rate, it definitely felt more comfortable, and my friend that I saw this with said he was liking the old frame rate better, and I said that it definitely was more familiar and comfortable. I have to say that I like the new format better in many ways, and once it becomes more comfortable to the eye, I think it is going to be something special. But right off the bat, it is not an obvious, comfortable new technology, such as, say, the upgrade from DVD to Blu-Ray was. It takes a while for the mind to adjust seeing the clarity. But in the places where it brings things alive, you will be happy you saw it in this format.

I'll be back in a bit to give my review of the movie itself.
Image
Life is a waste of time
Time is a waste of life
So get wasted all of the time
And you'll have the time of your life
User avatar
Cagliostro
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9360
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by Cagliostro »

Sorry for the double post. I suppose I feel about the movie and such the same way I felt about every LOTR movies up until now - grumpy about a few changes, but overall very pleased and had a great deal of fun. Great Gandalf speeches again, and Jackson and associates enhanced several things from the book. Here are the specifics, and very spoilerific:

Stuff that I didn't really like:
Spoiler
Azog the Defiler. I was very excited he was going to be in the movie, as it was a scene in one of the Tolkien books that made me realize the Dwarves in The Hobbit were not just greedy bastards. But making him the Lurtz of the movie kinda spoiled it for me. Why does Peter Jackson feel the need to have some growly bully in these movies?

Ol' Scrotum Chin - AKA the Great Goblin. Silly buffoon of a Goblin King. It also crapped up what might have been a better scene. I was expecting more of a growly bully there, and it would have been more fitting. But oh well.

A lot less Bilbo centric than I would have expected. But they are trying too hard to make it an ensemble piece.

Bilbo rushing out to defend Thorin at the end. It seemed a bit early in his development for this scene. I get why they did it, but...I dunno. Just seemed a bit wrong.

The dwarves were a lot braver than they ever seemed to me in the books.

Several dropped lines from the book, particularly the last riddle Gollum told. Why not include the final two lines of the riddle? Sure, we got the gist, but still. And furthermore, Bilbo not accidentally solving that riddle by saying to give him more time.

Most of these are minor quibbles though.
Now for what I liked:
Spoiler
The change that Bilbo leaves the dwarves and falls down to Gollum's cave before meeting the Goblin King. The timing in the book never made much sense; the dwarves waiting around for him for a while as he deals with Gollum. This way, they have their separate adventures and meet up at the same time. And with as much as they enhanced the goblin caves scenes, it really made a lot of sense this way.

The Gollumn scene - VERY moving. I welled up.

Radagast the Brown - loved him. Especially the bird crap on the side of his head. He was a tad silly, but I enjoyed the scenes with him, and especially the bunny sled.

The stone giants scene on the mountain - I have a deep rooted fear of those mountain passes as is, and having them moving and crumbling gave me serious heebie jeebies.

Interesting interplay between Gandalf and Saruman. The facial expression when Gandalf first hears he is there in Rivendell.

The (re-)introduction of Rivendell. Absolutely gorgeous, especially with the higher frame rate. I wish the first time we came across Rivendell in Lord of the Rings was like this. But for future generations who will probably watch The Hobbit first, it will be perfect.

How they did the scene with Bilbo with the Ring around Gollum. While it was silly that it was another accident to mirror the Frodo in Bree scene, that they had the same effect instead of just having Bilbo disappear like I was expecting make that link to the further movies and made it a bit more disconcerting than anything you would have expected from the book.

The smoke ring encircling the subtitle of this part of the Hobbit trilogy of movies. Just remindin' ya - it's linked with Lord of the Rings. Well done.

Other little nods to the other movies in the series. It never became obnoxious like the Star Wars prequels.

The creepiness of the Dol Guldur scene. I hope this part of the storyline pans out for the best.
So, yeah, pretty much what I was expecting - bits would displease me, but overall a fun ride with an epic feel.
Image
Life is a waste of time
Time is a waste of life
So get wasted all of the time
And you'll have the time of your life
User avatar
Hashi Lebwohl
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19576
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:38 pm

Post by Hashi Lebwohl »

I thought it captured the spirit and feel of the book almost completely.

Although not in the book, it is good that Radagast has finally been promoted to "actual character". Some people might be put-off by his very chaotic personality but remember that he hasn't lived around people in, well, a really long time.

Gandalf's reaction to Saruman is, in my opinion, one of "oh, crap--I'm in for another one of his lectures again". Gandalf could have saved everyone some trouble since he had already been to Dol Guldur, which is where he obtained Train's Key.
The Tank is gone and now so am I.
User avatar
Zarathustra
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19842
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:23 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by Zarathustra »

So, we're on a fantasy site which has a forum for movie discussions, and the biggest fantasy movie of the decade has just been released last week to record box office numbers, and only three people here have seen it? Or cared enough to chime in? Odd.
Success will be my revenge -- DJT
User avatar
lucimay
Lord
Posts: 15045
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Mott Wood, Genebakis
Contact:

Post by lucimay »

Zarathustra wrote:So, we're on a fantasy site which has a forum for movie discussions, and the biggest fantasy movie of the decade has just been released last week to record box office numbers, and only three people here have seen it? Or cared enough to chime in? Odd.
yeah i've been packing my belongings all week for the move so haven't had any time to see it and also am waiting for my friend webmonkey to go with me.

i will probably see it either this weekend or next. till then i'm going to read this whole thread, spoilers and all!! :P :lol:
you're more advanced than a cockroach,
have you ever tried explaining yourself
to one of them?
~ alan bates, the mothman prophecies



i've had this with actors before, on the set,
where they get upset about the [size of my]
trailer, and i'm always like...take my trailer,
cause... i'm from Kentucky
and that's not what we brag about.
~ george clooney, inside the actor's studio



a straight edge for legends at
the fold - searching for our
lost cities of gold. burnt tar,
gravel pits. sixteen gears switch.
Haphazard Lucy strolls by.
~ dennis r wood ~
User avatar
dlbpharmd
Lord
Posts: 14462
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 9:27 am
Been thanked: 2 times

Post by dlbpharmd »

*I've never been able to get through any of JRRT's books. IMO, they can't hold a candle to TCoTC. Having said that, I did like the LOTR movies.

I've seen The Hobbit. To me, it was every bit as slow and boring as some of the reviews have suggested. I actually fell asleep when they FINALLY got to Rivendell, so I have no idea what happened there.

The ONLY scene I liked was Bilbo/Gollum. Andy Serkis is a genius!
Image
ItisWritten
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 536
Joined: Wed May 02, 2007 2:22 am
Location: Bellevue, Washington

Post by ItisWritten »

I saw it Tuesday, IMax, 48 3D. Yeah, the inside scenes reminded me of those old soaps. Outside was less distracting. Most of the movie I wasn't even thinking about it. I'll be seeing it again this weekend. My son doesn't like 3-D.
Spoiler
The scrotum chin
was ultra-distracting.

In the movie version, I don't think Gandalf has been to Dol Guldur yet. Must have been given the key before Thrain went wandering off.
Spoiler
Bilbo as action-hero was early
, but I can live with it.

Riddles in the Dark was well done.

I do believe that Thorin in the book made the distinction between King Thranduil's elves and Elrond's elves. The over-arching distrust by the dwarves for all things elvish was tiring.

I'm looking forward to seeing it again.
ItisWritten
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24184
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

Beorn is here visiting me until Chr-stmas day. I really, really, really hope we'll have the opportunity to see a portrayal of his namesake together...
Image
User avatar
Hashi Lebwohl
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19576
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:38 pm

Post by Hashi Lebwohl »

ItisWritten wrote:In the movie version, I don't think Gandalf has been to Dol Guldur yet. Must have been given the key before Thrain went wandering off.
Agreed. The movie cannot be exactly like the book or we would have missed all that wonderful Radagast weirdness.

Now I am curious, though. Are the other two wizards ever named in any of the expanded writings that Christopher Tolkein published over the years? We know there are five but only three ever show up.
The Tank is gone and now so am I.
User avatar
Lefdmae Deemalr Effaeldm
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2943
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 12:45 pm
Location: Deep in psychotic, warped and weird thoughts
Has thanked: 1 time

Post by Lefdmae Deemalr Effaeldm »

Alatar and Pallando - both with sea-blue robes for some reason. And they didn't show up due to their location.
A role-player, beware
Image
User avatar
High Lord Tolkien
Excommunicated Member of THOOLAH
Posts: 7393
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 2:40 am
Location: Cape Cod, Mass
Been thanked: 3 times
Contact:

Post by High Lord Tolkien »

I saw it last weekend and loved it!
And I hated the LotR movies with a passion.
The changes mentioned above were all forgivable to me.
Except the pale Orc part.
That seemed silly and unnecessary.

It was great seeing the Eagles in action.
I thought it was very effective how they showed them as a physical threat.
The book describes what they did but to see it was much more powerful.

Radagast was great.
I'm not sure why people expected anything but a goodhearted light characterization of him.
In the Books Sauruman thought him a joke and Gandalf could only support him by saying he was a good guy.
My kids loved him which is the most important and it didn't really take away from the story.
I also think it was be a nice setup for the White Council attack on Don Guldur in the 2nd movie.

There's always been talk on Tolkien discussion forums about the difference (if any) between Orcs and Goblins.
i think this, like the Balrog's wings, was handled very well.
Goblins are smaller than Orcs and the movie got that dead on.

i want to see it again.
https://thoolah.blogspot.com/

[Defeated by a gizmo from Batman's utility belt]
Joker: I swear by all that's funny never to be taken in by that unconstitutional device again!


Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Hashi Lebwohl
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 19576
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:38 pm

Post by Hashi Lebwohl »

Effaeldm wrote:Alatar and Pallando - both with sea-blue robes for some reason. And they didn't show up due to their location.
Thank you. I will have to look up both of them at some point.
The Tank is gone and now so am I.
User avatar
rdhopeca
The Master
Posts: 2798
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Has thanked: 20 times
Been thanked: 12 times
Contact:

Post by rdhopeca »

I definitely liked it, but I haven't read the book in years. I didn't like it as much as LOTR per se, and I found the CGI Azog a little "flat" instead of the typical depth on the screen (I saw the 2D version), but the Gollum scene was flat out fantastic and the time seemed to fly by.
Rob

"Progress is made. Be warned."
User avatar
Cameraman Jenn
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 13280
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 11:33 pm
Location: Albuquerque NM (The Land of Enchantment)

Post by Cameraman Jenn »

I haven't seen it yet but my Dad did and he said it was pretty fantastic and made him want to revisit the book.
Now if I could just find a way to wear live bees as jewelry all the time.....

www.fantasybedtimehour.com
User avatar
JazFusion
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 2:41 am
Location: R'lyeh
Contact:

Post by JazFusion »

I saw it last weekend. I thought it was good. Something about the pacing seemed off to me. I haven't read the book in years, though.
"Everything was beautiful, and nothing hurt." - Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
Horrim Carabal
<i>Haruchai</i>
Posts: 612
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Post by Horrim Carabal »

I haven't chimed in because I'm not a huge Tolkien fan. The Hobbit was a book I read when I was 13 or so, didn't love it or hate it, then moved on.

The movie? Didn't love it or hate it. Ready to move on. :)

....as an aside though: Tolkien seems very interested in revenant characters, like Durin's Bane, the last Balrog in Middle Earth, hiding under a mountain for centuries or milennia before the dwarves woke him up, and Smaug, the last fire-drake, sleeping atop his pile of stolen treasure.

Not that I mind these themes/characters, I actually like the idea. I wonder what would have happened if the heroes hadn't slain these last vestiges of the First Age, and Sauron was able to contact/recruit them to his cause. Would Smaug even obey Sauron? I assume his leader was Ancalagon, Morgoth's lieutenant. But Sauron was Morgoth's chief general, although I can't really picture Sauron trying to pull rank on Ancalagon the Black. Not a good idea, most likely.

Similarly, would the Balrog of Moria have obeyed Sauron and done his bidding? Durin's Bane followed Gothmog in the First Age, although like I said Sauron probably technically outranked the Balrog king. However, I wouldn't bet on Sauron in a one-on-one battle with Gothmog.

These creatures would have made Sauron's forces even more unstoppable, had they not been killed by Gandalf and/or that archer guy. But I wonder if Smaug and Durin's Bane would have seen themselves more as Sauron's equal or partner rather than servants?
User avatar
Menolly
A Lowly Harper
Posts: 24184
Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 12:29 am
Location: Harper Hall, Fort Hold, Northern Continent, Pern...
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 15 times
Contact:

Post by Menolly »

High Lord Tolkien wrote:Radagast was great.
I'm not sure why people expected anything but a goodhearted light characterization of him.
In the Books Sauruman thought him a joke and Gandalf could only support him by saying he was a good guy.
My kids loved him which is the most important and it didn't really take away from the story.
The 7th Doctor lives on in Radagast the Brown!

Sylvestor McCoy was great in the role.
Image
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

Other than the arrival of the dwarfs, the thunder battle, and the flight through the hall*, I really didn't care for the movie. Just seemed all wrong to me, even though I was a fan of the other movies. The Hobbit was my favorite book growing up, and such a big departure from the tone of the book seemed to be making it into something it wasn't, going from simple adventure story to epic. The whole Thorin/Bilbo and Thorin/Azog thing was too sappy, Radagast was goofy, and Saruman was too big of a dick.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
SoulBiter
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9821
Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2004 2:02 am
Has thanked: 118 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Post by SoulBiter »

I havent seen it yet but plan to this coming weekend. But I also want to see Les Misarables....
We miss you Tracie but your Spirit will always shine brightly on the Watch Image
User avatar
Cagliostro
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 9360
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Colorado

Post by Cagliostro »

Menolly wrote:Beorn is here visiting me until Chr-stmas day. I really, really, really hope we'll have the opportunity to see a portrayal of his namesake together...
FYI - he isn't in part 1. I know the character has been cast, so I'm guessing part 2, unless Beorn has been shoved into an Extended Edition cut.
Image
Life is a waste of time
Time is a waste of life
So get wasted all of the time
And you'll have the time of your life
Post Reply

Return to “Flicks”