![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
I agree. However, in a different sense, I believe ALL organized religions hit the nail RIGHT on the head - for those who believe them. Despite lots of similarities, we are all different, and will achieve our respective enlightenments in different ways. One type of Christianity works for one person, another type for another, while yet another person feels best with some type of Hinduism. Here's two quotes I absolutely love, and have quoted before. Both are by Eknath Easwaran. The first is from his introduction to his translation of the Bhagavad Gita, and the second from his introduction to his translation of the Upanishads.Lady Revel wrote:I highly doubt that any kind of organized religion is close to hitting the nail on the head regarding how we are here and who is in charge.
Easwaran wrote:From the earliest times, Hinduism has proclaimed one God while accommodating worship of him (or her, for to millions God is the Divine Mother) in many different names. "Truth is one," says a famous verse of the Rig Veda; "men call it by various names." A monastic devotee might find that Shiva embodies the austere detachment he seeks; a devotee who wants to live "in the world," partaking of its innocent pleasures but devoted to service of his fellow creatures, might find in Krishna the perfect incarnation of his ideals. In every case, this clothing of the Infinite in human form serves to focus a devotee's love and to provide an inspiring ideal. But whatever form is worshipped, it is only an aspect of the same one God.
These quotes help me understand the different things people believe. Some say, "This is the ONLY way. All other paths are false." Well, I can't know that they're wrong, even though I believe they are. But I think some people have a need to have found the One Way, and that's fine. On some level, maybe some people are not comfortable with the idea of many different, equally valid choices. How to choose? But if they have reason to believe that one specific way is THE way, they can relax.Easwaran wrote:The Upanishads are not systematic philosophy; they are more like ecstatic slide shows of mystical experience - vivid, disjointed, stamped with the power of direct personal encounter with the divine. If they seem to embrace contradictions, that is because they do not try to smooth over the seams of these experiences. They simply set down what the rishis saw, viewing the ultimate reality from different levels of spiritual awareness, like snapshots of the same object from different angles: now seeing God as utterly transcendent, for example, now seeing God as immanent as well. These differences are not important, and the Upanishads agree on their central ideas: ...
I don't know. Just my theory.
Nor is it possible. I don't have a switch on the back of my head that I can throw, and suddenly believe something.Lady Revel wrote:"But believing doesn't hurt anything, in fact, you protect yourself just in case, because all you have to do is believe and you can get into heaven". It cannot be that easy.