The Greatest Science Fiction Movies Ever Made

A place for anything *not* Donaldson.

Moderator: I'm Murrin

User avatar
I'm Murrin
Are you?
Posts: 15840
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 1:09 pm
Location: North East, UK
Contact:

Post by I'm Murrin »

On the classification of Being John Malkovitch, I think Card is just one of those people who refer to all fantasy genres as sci-fi (despite sci-fi actually being a subset of fantasy).
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Hmmmmm. Bladerunner, while a good movie was a pretty bad adaptation of Dick's book. Screamers was much more faithful, and a really underrated movie.

I'll take Silent Running, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (the original and the one from the 70s), Alien, The Abyss, and The Terminator.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
danlo
Lord
Posts: 20838
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 8:29 pm
Location: Albuquerque NM
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post by danlo »

I agree: Screamers was very good: hey, ever seen Imposter with Gary Sinise? Another pretty cool Dick adaptation...
fall far and well Pilots!
User avatar
Fist and Faith
Magister Vitae
Posts: 25450
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 8:14 pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 57 times

Post by Fist and Faith »

Yeah, I liked Imposter too.
All lies and jest
Still a man hears what he wants to hear
And disregards the rest
-Paul Simon

Image
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Yeah, Imposter was pretty good.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Vector
Elohim
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Vector »

Well, I have not yet seen Impostor, I just added it, along with screamers, to my netflix queue...
"When you look into the abyss, the abyss looks back into you" - Nietzsche
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

I thought Malkovich was very Phillip K. Dick, which is to say, SF without much detail on the mechanism.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
matrixman
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 11:24 am

Post by matrixman »

Vector wrote: I also liked Terminator 2 - and when it came out it really broke ground in the special effects department which served to raise the bar considerably in later SF movies. However, though it clearly has scifi underpinnings, I always feel that the action is emphasized more than the sci-fi elements - so I didn't list it, but I did debate to myself about putting it on this list, so it was a close call.
True, I also would describe T2 as an action film first and a sci-fi film second, even though the sci-fi premise is crucial to the story. Labels, labels... :)
Cail wrote:Bladerunner, while a good movie was a pretty bad adaptation of Dick's book.
I've never read any of Philip K. Dick's stories, so I'll take your word that Blade Runner was a bad adaptation. As a movie, I love it, of course. It's among my favorite sci-fi movies ever. I don't think an adaptation should be held prisoner to the source material, especially in the case of a film as special as Blade Runner: I appreciate it on its own terms as cinematic art.
User avatar
wayfriend
.
Posts: 20957
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 12:34 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 6 times

Post by wayfriend »

Matrixman wrote:True, I also would describe T2 as an action film first and a sci-fi film second [...]
Are there any sci-fi films that are sci-fi first, and not action first, or comedy first, or buddy-movie first, or drama-first, or even romance first (which I include because they spewed out Solaris) ??? May the Space Odyssey movies ... can't think of many more.
.
User avatar
Vector
Elohim
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Vector »

True, most sci-fi movies use the sci-fi basis as an excuse for action to some degree or another. BUt there are levels on the scale - many continue exploring the concepts as the movie continues, whereas some, once the basis is established, continue on as almost pure action movies.

Some examples of sci-fi movies which are not action movies:

Close encounters of the Third Kind
Contact
K-Pax
Cocoon
The Abyss, though with some exciting moments, is not really an action movie
etc...
"When you look into the abyss, the abyss looks back into you" - Nietzsche
User avatar
[Syl]
Unfettered One
Posts: 13021
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 12:36 am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by [Syl] »

Check out Primer. Great Sci-Fi, zero action.
"It is not the literal past that rules us, save, possibly, in a biological sense. It is images of the past. Each new historical era mirrors itself in the picture and active mythology of its past or of a past borrowed from other cultures. It tests its sense of identity, of regress or new achievement against that past.”
-George Steiner
User avatar
danlo
Lord
Posts: 20838
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 8:29 pm
Location: Albuquerque NM
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Post by danlo »

Silent Running...The Martian Chronicles (though it was originally a miniseries) to some degree and The Illustrated Man.
fall far and well Pilots!
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Matrixman wrote:
Cail wrote:Bladerunner, while a good movie was a pretty bad adaptation of Dick's book.
I've never read any of Philip K. Dick's stories, so I'll take your word that Blade Runner was a bad adaptation. As a movie, I love it, of course. It's among my favorite sci-fi movies ever. I don't think an adaptation should be held prisoner to the source material, especially in the case of a film as special as Blade Runner: I appreciate it on its own terms as cinematic art.
Very true, but the movie misses (or ignores) the main theme of the book. I agree both are good, but I'm glad Scott chose to use a different title than the book, since it is a really different story.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
Avatar
Immanentizing The Eschaton
Posts: 62038
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 9:17 am
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 32 times
Contact:

Post by Avatar »

Agreed. In that movie, the original title wouldn't have made much sense.

--Avatar
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

My favourite sci-fi film is the 1960s version of The Time Machine.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
User avatar
Loredoctor
Lord
Posts: 18609
Joined: Sun Jul 14, 2002 11:35 pm
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Contact:

Post by Loredoctor »

danlo wrote:Silent Running...
GREAT movie. Beautiful.
Waddley wrote:your Highness Sir Dr. Loredoctor, PhD, Esq, the Magnificent, First of his name, Second Cousin of Dragons, White-Gold-Plate Wielder!
User avatar
Cail
Lord
Posts: 38981
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 1:36 am
Location: Hell of the Upside Down Sinners

Post by Cail »

Loremaster wrote:
danlo wrote:Silent Running...
GREAT movie. Beautiful.
Yup, that one's definately a classic.
"There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." - PJ O'Rourke
_____________
"Men and women range themselves into three classes or orders of intelligence; you can tell the lowest class by their habit of always talking about persons; the next by the fact that their habit is always to converse about things; the highest by their preference for the discussion of ideas." - Charles Stewart
_____________
"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." - James Madison
_____________
User avatar
matrixman
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 8361
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2003 11:24 am

Post by matrixman »

Say, Vector, since you have both Dark City and The Matrix on your favorites list, I'd like to ask what you make of film critic Roger Ebert's view that The Matrix is more or less just a shallow version of Dark City--that Dark City is a true sci-fi original that delves deeply into issues of human identity and all that, while The Matrix merely presents a cool premise, but doesn't dig deeper, becoming just an action movie. I don't have the link to Ebert's reviews of both films on me, but you can just go to rogerebert.com, I think.

I disagree with Ebert's contention that The Matrix is not a deep sci-fi film: it certainly had a profound impact on me! However, I like Dark City very much, too. I caught it on TV only a few months ago, in fact, and I thought it was a very arresting, thought-provoking film. But at no time did I feel that--aha!--The Matrix ripped off this movie. I think the two films are quite different from each other.

Anyway, what do you think? :)
User avatar
Edge
The Gap Into Spam
Posts: 2945
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 5:09 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Post by Edge »

Personally, I think that 'The Matrix' is just a populist/lowbrow version of the movie 'Pi'. :)
Check out my digital art at www.brian.co.za
User avatar
Vector
Elohim
Posts: 236
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 6:55 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA

Post by Vector »

Matrixman wrote:Say, Vector, since you have both Dark City and The Matrix on your favorites list, I'd like to ask what you make of film critic Roger Ebert's view that The Matrix is more or less just a shallow version of Dark City--that Dark City is a true sci-fi original that delves deeply into issues of human identity and all that, while The Matrix merely presents a cool premise, but doesn't dig deeper, becoming just an action movie. I don't have the link to Ebert's reviews of both films on me, but you can just go to rogerebert.com, I think.

I disagree with Ebert's contention that The Matrix is not a deep sci-fi film: it certainly had a profound impact on me! However, I like Dark City very much, too. I caught it on TV only a few months ago, in fact, and I thought it was a very arresting, thought-provoking film. But at no time did I feel that--aha!--The Matrix ripped off this movie. I think the two films are quite different from each other.

Anyway, what do you think? :)
Hmmm, I just read his review and though he does make some good points, I think he is wrong. I can see it borrowing from "Strange Days" as he mentions, a movie that I also enjoyed - but the use of that virtual reality is very different - in "Strange Days", the VR was totally playback, which is very different from a reconstructed interactive world that was presented in Matrix - though the initial scene where Neo is in his home and the gang shows up to buy mind narcotics was reminiscent of "Strange Days". If I was to say that Matrix borrowed something from some other movie - I would look at such anime movies as "Ghost in the Shell", and I think the borrowing is more obvious in that case, especially when the Matrix is taken as a whole along with the Animatrix - this helps to see the connections.

The connections he makes with "Dark City", IMO, are simplistic - that they are both cases of "Humanity" being confined in an artificial world maintained by other beings - this is a common theme in many movies and books - for example the recent "The Forgotten", or "The Thirteenth Floor" (which btw also shares a lot of concepts with The Matrix) - SO I think he is being plain wrong with Dark City.

I DO think that The Matrix used action and special effects as its primary vehicle/style, however, it exposed to mainstream cinema a number of concepts that were not seen there previously - the concept of generating a World where the mind could live without being aware that it is in a machine. This concept was presented very well and though not entirely original, the way it was used seemed original to me. I had always thought of that concept as a way to give humankind a form of "immortality" since if a brain could be maintained much longer than the body, then why could it not go on living is such a virtual world ? But I had never thought of using such a virtual world as a way to keep the minds prisoner.

Also, such concepts of as learning through immediate brain dumps was explored rather effectively. There are plenty of other interesting concepts integrated as well.

In conclusion, though certainly "The Matrix" borrowed and adapted many concepts (and who doesn't), those concepts were integrated in an original way and the underpinnings of the story were far from shallow.
"When you look into the abyss, the abyss looks back into you" - Nietzsche
Post Reply

Return to “General Fantasy/Sci-Fi Discussion”