Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri May 20, 2011 8:27 pm
by Worm of Despite
Vraith wrote:Lord Foul wrote:Vraith wrote:
I'd say he's wrong...there is a metric f-load of philosophy engaging with science, including physics.
DAMN IT ALL.
Every f*cking silly thread I make turns into a legitimate discussion.
I have to stop this. Here goes:
Kittens. Checkers. Quack. Winston Churchill. Neville Chamberlain dancing at the Berghof.
This is very odd...when I quote your actual post, I'm seeing a completely different post while I'm typing here...I wonder what it will look like when I submit?
Are you on the wacky junk?
No. In all fairness. My first post was cheeky and good-spirited though a bit confrontational. So I edited it. You caught me with my pants down, good sir. Excellent work!
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 1:45 am
by aliantha
Vraith wrote:FWIW, Creationism is governed by the basic equations E=MCsquared, where E is egregiousness, M is malaprops, a measure of actual science used in inappropriate ways, C is "Chestertons," a constant standing for the velocity of verbiage in a vacuum.
Nice one.
BTW, I ate at Berghoff's once. It's a pretty good German restaurant in Chicago's Loop.
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 3:34 am
by rusmeister
Loremaster wrote:
C.K. Chesterton is round therefore the Earth is round.
I case my rest.
That has to be the best argument I have seen for that in here!
Posted: Sat May 21, 2011 5:41 am
by Linna Heartbooger
High Lord Tolkien wrote:Check out Google Earth.
It's supposed to be "3D".
But look at Google Earth on your screen, touch it with your fingers.......it's FLAT!
You can't explain that.
No one can.
Muahaha..
Btw, north is really up, and south is really down, also.
HEEEYYY... also, anyone else here read the little satire "Flatland"?
Also, just because I respond to this thread in its intended vein, if I don't respond to claims that "nobody on this forum would believe [certain things]" is not enough info for you to make any assumptions of what I do or do not believe...